【文章內容簡介】 s: Transparency, Method ?Specification/TOR/Quality ?Availability of Funds ?Value for Money/Cost Details/Consulting Fee ?Evaluation Modality ?Performance Security/Warranty ?Shipping/Insurance ?Licensing/Copyrights ?Use of LTA ?Type of Contracts ?Payment Terms 37 Advisory Committee on Procurement ? Established by CPO to oversee major contracts ? Review contracts which involve mitments to a supplier with respect to a single requisition or series of req in a calendar year valued at $100,000 or more ? Proposed contracts which generate ine of $10,000 ? Any amendment of a contract previously reviewed by ACP where the contract amendment or a series of amendments either increases the total amount by 20% or $100,000 whichever is less. ? Any amendment not previously submitted to the ACP where the revised total contract amount exceeds $100,000. 38 ACP: ? Proposed contract that leads to series of contracts amounting more than $100,000. ? Disposal, Writeoff or transfer of goods with asset value $30,000 or more ? All vehicle accidents or losses when gross negligence is the cause. ? Procurement of services related to individual consultants with contract amount exceeding $100,000. 39 A C P Su b m i s s i o n s 0 511%20%20%12%15%22%HQAAPASECL A CHQ A AP AS EC L A C T o t a l99 175 181 107 132 198 8924 0 m 1 5 4 m 1 5 8 m 1 1 9 m 3 2 m 9 6 m 5 9 9 m40 Common Reasons for Rejection ? Failure to undertake a petitive exercise ? Impermissible justification for waiver ? TOR or Statement of Works or Specifications inplete ? TOR or Statement of Works or Specifications too restrictive or biased ? Incorrect evaluation methodology or criteria ? Failure to submit requested documentation for ACP review ? Conflict of interest ? Value for money not obtained ? Incorrect procurement method used ? Incorrect shipping terms cited 41 Key Observations: ? SOW/TOR not clear, Biased/ Inadequate specification or specific requirements or brand names ? Evaluation Criteria does not cover all the deliverables and do not provide sufficient weight as per their importance ? Wrong Procurement Methodology ? Use of NGOs for procurement ? Advance Payment on the very high side ? Process too mechanical, Market research missing ? Insufficient number of responses ? Evaluation of Offers not done well 42 Oversight at a Glance: ? Number of cases from RBLAC: 265 ? Number of cases from RBAP: 236 ? Number of cases from RBA: 205 ? Number of cases from RBEC: 75 ? Number of cases from RBAS: 89 ? Number of cases from HQ units: 138 ? Number of cases withheld for approval: 31% ? Number of cases if “subject to” is included: Nearly 55% 43 Procurement certification ? Course has been designed inhouse by OLPS ? Addresses basic procurement policy and standard Atlas Procedures. ? Objective: learners’ prehension of UNDP procurement policy and processes 2. Increase the level of petence utilizing the Atlas Applications. ? Target group is “Buyer” ? Online programme ( 6 hrs for online course and 2 hours for the exam.) ? Course managed by LRC ? Status: – Number of people enrolled:731 – Number of people who have passed simulated assessment: 345 – Number who took official assessment: 321 – Number who passed: 220 44 G e n e r a l R a t i n g P r o c u r e m e n t V o l u m e 3 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0P u r c h a s e O r d e r R a i s e d C o u n t 1345T o t a l v a l u e 2 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0n o n P O V o u c h e r s a b o v e 2 , 5 0 0 ( U S D ) C o u n t 400T o t a l v a l u e 9 8 0 , 0 0 0N E X P r o c u r e m e n t 2 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0D E X P r o c u r e m e n t 1 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0A g e n c y P r o c u r e m e n t 0C o u n t 6T o t a l v a l u e 1 8 0 , 0 0 0C o u n t 3T o t a l v a l u e 3 0 0 , 0 0 0+ O v e r a l l 35%+ M a n a g e m e n t o f D i r e c t P a y m e n t ( n o n P O ) 6 d a y s+ M a n a g e m e n t o f P a y m e n t ( P O ) 1 4 d a y s+ L e a d T i m e 1 0 / 7S u b m i s s i o n o f P l a n Y e sA p p r o v a l o f P l a n Y e sQ u a l i t y o f S u b m i s s i o n s + T o t a l 6D e l e g a t e d P r o c u r e m e n t a u t h o r i t y 5 0 , 0 0 0 ( U S D )P O s i s s u e s b e t w e e n 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 a n d D e l e g a t e d A u t h o r i t yC o u n t 3T o t a l v a l u e 1 7 0 , 0 0 0P O s i s s u e d a b o v e d e l e g a t e d a u t h o r i t y C o u n t 6T o t a l v a l u e 6 0 0 , 0 0 0N u m b e r o f s t a f f w i t h b u y e r p r o f i l e 8N u m b e r o f s t a f f C e r t i f i e d 5P r o c u r e m e n t V o l u m eH i g h v a l u e t r a n s a c t i o n s ( P O )3 0 , 0 0 0 ~ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0A d v i s o r y C o m m i t t e e o n P r o c u r e m e n tP r o c u r e m e n t C a p a c i t y 1 0 0 , 0 0 0L o w v a l u e t r a n s a c t i o n s ( P O )P r o c e s s T i m eP r o c u r e m e n t P l a nProcurement Dashboard Indicators 45 Global Fund Procurement: ? Procurement forms nearly 80% of the project amount. ? Focus is on HIV/AIDS, Malaria and TB ? UNDP is involved in 28 countries as PR and for support services in 5 countries ? Total project amount is nearly $650 m but annual delivery is nearly $200 m. ? OLPS has one full time Procurement Advisor working very closely with the country offices and major suppliers. ? Major suppliers are IDA, Mission Pharma, CIPLA, UNICEF, UNFPA, IAPSO etc. UNDP has LTA with them. ? OLPS Procurement Advisor is focusing on assisting the country office to improve delivery, help them in transferring knowledge to the counterpart, help them build supply chain. 46 Long Term Arrangement: – LTA offer a number of advantages: – they offer the value for money advantages of centralized procuremen