【正文】 沒(méi)有提及。難句解析： one leading authority says that these intensely powerfulmental events can be not only harnessed but actually brought under consciouscontrol to help us sleep and feel better?！窘Y(jié)構(gòu)分析】該句子為復(fù)合句。賓語(yǔ)從句的主干是“these? events can be not only harnessed but actually brought?”，其中“notonly?but?”并列連詞結(jié)構(gòu)連接兩個(gè)過(guò)去分詞，表示“不僅被駕馭??而且被加以有意識(shí)的控制”。不定式在賓語(yǔ)從句中做結(jié)果狀語(yǔ)。 people seem to have more bad dreams early in the night,progressing toward happier ones before awakening, suggesting that they areworking through negative feelings generated during the day。【結(jié)構(gòu)分析】本句的主句是“most people seem to have more bad dreams early in the night”。后面是兩個(gè)現(xiàn)在分詞短語(yǔ)做狀語(yǔ)，分別由“progressing”和“suggesting”引導(dǎo)。全文翻譯：在一夜好覺(jué)的所有組成因素中，夢(mèng)似乎是最無(wú)法控制的一個(gè)。在夢(mèng)中，我們打開(kāi)窗戶(hù)看見(jiàn)的世界里，邏輯被中止，死人開(kāi)口說(shuō)話。一個(gè)世紀(jì)前，弗洛伊德闡述了他的革命性理論，即夢(mèng)是人們無(wú)意識(shí)的欲望和恐懼經(jīng)偽裝后的影子。到20世紀(jì)70年代末期，神經(jīng)病學(xué)家們轉(zhuǎn)而認(rèn)為夢(mèng)是“精神噪音”，即睡眠時(shí)神經(jīng)修復(fù)活動(dòng)的一種胡亂的副產(chǎn)品。如今，研究人員猜測(cè)夢(mèng)是大腦情感自動(dòng)調(diào)節(jié)系統(tǒng)的一部分，當(dāng)大腦處于“離線”狀態(tài)時(shí)對(duì)情緒進(jìn)行規(guī)整。一名主要的權(quán)威人士說(shuō)，夢(mèng)這種異常強(qiáng)烈的精神活動(dòng)不僅能被駕馭，事實(shí)上還可以被加以有意識(shí)的控制，以幫助我們更好地睡眠和感覺(jué)。芝加哥醫(yī)療中心心理學(xué)系主任羅薩蘭德卡特懷特說(shuō)“夢(mèng)是你自己的，如果你不喜歡，就改變它?！贝竽X成像的證據(jù)支持了這個(gè)觀點(diǎn)。匹茲堡大學(xué)的埃里克博士說(shuō)，在夢(mèng)境很形象的快速動(dòng)眼睡眠中，大腦和完全清醒時(shí)一樣活躍。但不是大腦的所有部分都在活動(dòng)，腦邊緣系統(tǒng)異?；钴S，而前額皮層則相對(duì)安靜。斯坦福睡眠研究員威廉姆迪曼特博士說(shuō)：“我們從夢(mèng)中醒來(lái)，要么高興要么沮喪，這些情緒會(huì)伴隨我們一整天?！痹诳ㄌ貞烟氐脑\所的病人可以看出夢(mèng)和情緒之間的聯(lián)系。多數(shù)人似乎在前半夜做更多不好的夢(mèng)，而在快睡醒前發(fā)展成為開(kāi)心一些的夢(mèng)，這說(shuō)明人們?cè)趬?mèng)里逐漸克服了白天產(chǎn)生的負(fù)面情緒。因?yàn)榍逍褧r(shí)我們的頭腦被日?，嵤抡紦?jù)著，所以并不總?cè)ハ氚滋彀l(fā)生的事情對(duì)我們情緒的影響，直到我們開(kāi)始做夢(mèng)，這種影響看來(lái)才會(huì)出現(xiàn)。這一過(guò)程不一定是無(wú)意識(shí)的?？ㄌ貞烟叵嘈湃藗兛梢跃毩?xí)有意識(shí)地控制噩夢(mèng)的重復(fù)發(fā)生。當(dāng)你一醒過(guò)來(lái)，立刻確定夢(mèng)中有什么在困擾你，設(shè)想一下你希望這個(gè)夢(mèng)怎么結(jié)束，下次再做同樣的夢(mèng)時(shí)，試著醒過(guò)來(lái)以控制它的進(jìn)程。通過(guò)多次練習(xí)，人們完全可以學(xué)會(huì)在夢(mèng)中這樣做?？ㄌ貞烟卣f(shuō)，說(shuō)到底，如果夢(mèng)沒(méi)有使我們無(wú)法入睡或“從夢(mèng)中驚醒”，就沒(méi)有理由太在意它?？射J教育官網(wǎng)恐怖主義、經(jīng)濟(jì)不穩(wěn)定及通常的不安全感都增加了人們的憂(yōu)慮。那些長(zhǎng)期受到噩夢(mèng)困擾的人應(yīng)該接受專(zhuān)家?guī)椭鴮?duì)其他人來(lái)說(shuō)，大腦有自動(dòng)消除不良情緒的方法。睡一覺(jué)甚至做個(gè)夢(mèng)，早上醒來(lái)時(shí)你會(huì)感覺(jué)好多了。第四篇：2018年可銳考研英語(yǔ)閱讀模擬試題及名師解析可銳教育官網(wǎng)2018年可銳考研英語(yǔ)閱讀模擬試題及名師解析（七）Do you rememberall those years when scientists argued that smoking would kill us but thedoubters insisted that we didn’t know for sure? That the evidence was inconclusive, the scienceuncertain? That the antismoking lobby was out to destroy our way of life andthe government should stay out of the way? Lots of Americans bought thatnonsense, and over three decades, some 10 million smokers went to early graves。There are upsetting parallels today, as scientists in one waveafter another try to awaken us to the growing threat of global was a panel from the National Academy of Sciences, enlisted by the WhiteHouse, to tell us that the Earth’s atmosphere is definitely warming and that the problem is clear message is that we should get moving to protest president of the National Academy, Bruce Alberts, added this key point inthe preface to the panel’s report: “Science never has all the answers。” But science doesprovide us with the best available guide to the future, and it is critical thatour nation and the world base important policies on the best judgments thatscience can provide concerning the future consequences of present actions。Just as on smoking, voices now e from many quarters insistingthat the science about global warming is inplete, that it’s OK to keeppouring fumes into the air until we know for is a dangerous game: bythe time 100 percent of the evidence is in, it may be too the risksobvious and growing, a prudent people would take out an insurance policy now。Fortunately, the White House is starting to pay it’s obviousthat a majority of the president’s advisers still don’t take global warming of a plan of action, theycontinue to press for more research—a classic case of “paralysis byanalysis。”To serve as responsible stewards of the planet, we must pressforward on deeper atmospheric and oceanic research alone the Administration won’t take thelegislative initiative, Congress should help to begin fashioning bill by Democratic Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, whichwould offer financial incentives for private industry, is a promising see that the country is getting ready to build lots of new power plants tomeet our energy we are ever going to protect the atmosphere, it iscrucial that those new plants be environmentally sound。 argument made by supporters of smoking was that[A] there was no scientific evidence of the correlation betweensmoking and death。[B] the number of early deaths of smokers in the past decades wasinsignificant。[C] people had the freedom to choose their own way of life。[D] antismoking people were usually talking nonsense。 to Bruce Alberts, science can serve as[A] a protector。[B] a judge。[C] a critic。[D] a guide。 does the author mean by “paralysis byanalysis” ?[A] Endless studies kill action。[B] Careful investigation reveals truth。[C] Prudent planning hinders progress。[D] Extensive research helps decisionmaking。 to the author, what should the Administration doabout global warming?[A] Offer aid to build cleaner power plants。[B] Raise public awareness of conservation。[C] Press for further scientific research。[D] Take some legislative measures。 author associates the issue of global warming with that ofsmoking because[A] they both suffered from the government’s negligence。[B] a lesson from the latter is applicable to the former。[C] the oute of the latter aggravates the former。[D] both of them have turned from bad to worse。名師可銳教育官網(wǎng)解析 argument made by supporters of smoking was that吸煙的支持者提出的觀點(diǎn)是[A] there was no scientific evidence of the correlation betweensmoking and death。沒(méi)有科學(xué)證據(jù)證明吸煙和死亡之間存在相互聯(lián)系。[B] the number of early deaths of smokers in the past decades wasinsignificant。在過(guò)去的幾十年中過(guò)早死亡的吸煙者人數(shù)不多。[C] people had the freedom to choose their own way of life。人們有選擇自己生活方式的自由。[D] antismoking people were usually talking nonsense。反對(duì)吸煙的人通常一派胡言?！敬鸢浮?C【考點(diǎn)】 事實(shí)細(xì)節(jié)題?！痉治觥?從第一段可以看出，其實(shí)支持吸煙的人的理由不止一個(gè)，比如證據(jù)不夠充分，科學(xué)也不能確定，反對(duì)吸煙的游說(shuō)是為了毀掉我們的生活方式等等。[A]選項(xiàng)是出題人故意擴(kuò)大范圍，夸大選項(xiàng)，故意絕對(duì)化，原文只是證據(jù)不足，而不是沒(méi)有證據(jù)。[B]選項(xiàng)說(shuō)死亡人數(shù)不多，而原文提到的“1,000萬(wàn)”可不是小數(shù)字。[D]選項(xiàng)不符合的原因是作者說(shuō)支持吸煙的人的話是“nonsense”，而不是反對(duì)吸煙的人的話。 to Bruce Alberts, science can serve as根據(jù)布魯斯阿爾伯特的觀點(diǎn)，科學(xué)能充當(dāng)[A] a 。[B] a 、法官。[C] a 。[D] a ?！敬鸢浮?D【考點(diǎn)】 事實(shí)細(xì)節(jié)題?！痉治觥?文章第二段第四句中有這樣的話“科學(xué)從來(lái)都不能夠提供所有的答案，但是科學(xué)卻能夠?yàn)槲覀兲峁┩ㄏ蛭磥?lái)的最佳引導(dǎo)”。 does the author mean by “paralysis byanalysis” ?作者通過(guò)“分析性癱瘓癥”表達(dá)什么意思?[A] Endless studies ki