【正文】
技術(shù)理性 組織行為 結(jié)構(gòu)化互動(dòng) ? 不同理論角度 → ?不同角度的收集資料 ? 不同 theory觀點(diǎn)互補(bǔ) → ?bias ? political vs. culture vs. conflict vs. structure (六 )Synthetic Strategy ? 將 QAL的 data強(qiáng)轉(zhuǎn)化程各種 variable:例如各個(gè)事件 pattern相關(guān)的時(shí)間、背景、feedback、平行、互動(dòng)、衝突解決方式 ? develop一個(gè)因果關(guān)係模式來預(yù)測(cè)檢定因果關(guān)係 ? 已不大符合質(zhì)化的精神 5. 質(zhì)化研究的信效度問題Credibility of Qual R ? Three Elements of Credibility ? Techniques for Enhancing The Quality of Analysis ? The Credibility of Researcher 1) Integrity analysis: testing rival explanation ? Find data support rival explanation 2) Negative cases: ? Negative core conflict main pattern very useful provide insight. ? NC find exception/provide new rule broken the rule change the rule doubt on the rule ? Better than “perfect single view/rule” (一 )Techniques for Enhancing The Quality of Analysis 3) Triangulations: eliminate systematic biases ? 3 kinds of triangulations: (1)Methods triangulations: ? Reconciling Qual and Quan data ? Same concept different operational measures (一 )Techniques for Enhancing The Quality of Analysis (2)Triangulation of Qual data sources: ? Different means: observation, interviews, document ? Public vs private says ? Same thing over time ? Different view of points 上中下 內(nèi)外 勞資 (一 )Techniques for Enhancing The Quality of Analysis (3)Analysis Trangulation ? Multiple view of interpretation ? Multiple analyst/researcher (一 )Techniques for Enhancing The Quality of Analysis (4)Theory Triangulation: ? Different theoretical perspective to look at same data. ? Compare behavioral, group dynamic, cultural contingency, structuation theories (二 )Techniques for Enhancing The Quality of Analysis (二 )The Credibility of Researcher ? Not having previously decided favor of one position ? No one is value – free ? State beforehand their interpretation ? Impartial, balance view ? Return to the data over over to support interpretation ? Means not ends END