airline航空公司收購合并案例分析(編輯修改稿)
2025-03-26 18:12 本頁面
【文章內(nèi)容簡介】 the political dimensions of the question. Because most governments see airlines as a key national industry, they oppose giving foreign carriers access to domestic routes on grounds of both national security and consumer welfare. 1. Countries believe they can save money by maintaining small air forces and relying on domestic airlines in times of unusual air transport needs. For example, government used mercial carriers to help carry troops to and from Iraq. 2. As well, airlines are a source of national pride, and aircraft symbolize a country?s sovereignty and technical petence. 公司 LOGO與名稱 Q4 The Foreign Ownership Restrictions on Airlines ? The United States and Canada restrict foreign ownership to 25% ? The EU has taken steps to liberalize within Europe and sets a 49% limit on nonEuropean ownership. ? In Australia and New Zealand, foreigners are permitted to acquire up to 49% of the equity of an international carrier and up to 100% of a domestic airline. 公司 LOGO與名稱 Q4 Reasons 1. We need US carriers for national security ? US believe they can save money by maintaining small air forces and relying on domestic airlines in times of unusual air transport needs. Argument: ? It would be cheaper and better if the US government simply tendered for charters on the open market 公司 LOGO與名稱 Q4 Reasons 2. Foreign Airlines Don39。t Have the Same Security Standards ? US have worried about protecting their airspace for security reasons. Argument: ? A US airline owned by foreign investors is operated by US permanent residents and citizens, and following all US standards and procedures, subject to all US regulations and controls. 公司 LOGO與名稱 Q4 Reasons 3. Foreign Airlines Would Take Away Jobs from Americans ? The desire to maintain existing jobs threatened by foreign petition is probably the single most important source of today?s protectionist policies Argument
法律信息相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1