美國醉駕的法律規(guī)制、爭議及啟示-資料下載頁
2025-01-01 06:04本頁面
【正文】 le v．Bostehnan 325 . 3d 22, 33, 756 953, 962, 258 Ill. Dec．679, 688 (Ill. App. 2Dist, 2001)．[19]See National Highway Traffic Safety Adm.，. Dept. of Transp.，HS 178 R2/00, DWI Detection and Standardized Field Sobriety Testing,Student Manual (2000)，at VIII3.[20]同前注[14],Donald J. Ramsell文。[21]其中，呼吸測試是最方便執(zhí)行的一種測試，因而被廣泛運(yùn)用；血液測試是最準(zhǔn)確也是最昂貴的測試方法；而尿液測試則是最不準(zhǔn)確的測試方法。警察通常會(huì)根據(jù)案件情況決定選擇呼吸測試還是尿液檢測，血液檢測只有在發(fā)生車禍、司機(jī)受傷并被送往醫(yī)療機(jī)構(gòu)救助的場合。See Brian J. Wolf, “The Impact of New Technology on Expert Testimony: An Evolving Science And Its Utilization By Creative Counsel”, Aspatore 1 June, 2010.[22]同前注[21],Brian J. Wolf文。[23]See Lawrence Tayor and Steven Oberman, “ Drunk Driving Defense” ( Aspen Publishers) (6 th ed. 2006).538page.[24]同前注[21], Brian J. Wolf文。[25]同前注[23], Lawrence Tayor和Steven Oberman書，第540頁。[26]同前注[23], Lawrence Tayor和Steven Oberman書，第570～582頁。[27]Morissette, 342 U. S. at 252.[28]陳露：《刑事嚴(yán)格責(zé)任之厘清與解構(gòu)》，《刑事法評論》2009年第1期。[29]See Mark Feigl, “DWI And The Insanity Defense: A Reasoned Approach”, Vermont Law Review, Fall, 1995.[30]See Anne C. Gresham, “The Insanity Plea: A Futile Defense for Serial Killers”, 17 Lam＆Psychol. Rev. 193, 193 (1993)．[31]See Morissette v. United States, 342 . 246, 256 (1952)．[32]《模范刑法典》第208(2)規(guī)定：“在以輕率作為犯罪要件時(shí)，行為人對自己招致的醉態(tài)，以致未能認(rèn)識(shí)到如在清醒狀態(tài)下應(yīng)該能夠認(rèn)識(shí)的危險(xiǎn)時(shí)，其未能認(rèn)識(shí)不影響犯罪的成立?！眳⒁姟睹绹７缎谭ǖ浼捌湓u注》，劉仁文、王煒等譯，法律出版社2005年版，第39頁。[33]同前注[29],Mark Feigl文。[34]See Monte Kuligowski, “Rethinking DUI Law in VIRGINIA”, University of Richmond Law Review, Annual Survey 2007.[35]See North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 . 711, 717 (1969)．[36]See Statev．Hickham, No. MV 94618025, 1995 WL 243352.[37]See State v. Hanson, 543 N. W. 2d 84, 86 (Minn. 1996) (en banc)．[38]See United States v. Halper, 490 U. S. 435, 448 (1990)．[39]See Daniel A. Allen, “To Punish or To Remedy—That is The Constitutional Question: Double Jeopardy Confusion in State v. Hanson”，Creighton Law Review, December, 1996.[40]See Daniel T. Gilbert and John A. Stephen, “Is suspension of drivers’ license in jeopardy?”, May/June, 1995( pages)．[41]See Hansen, 249 Neb. at 190, 542 N. W. 2d at 433.[42]Loui v. Bd. of Medical Exam’rs,889 P. 2d 705, 711 (Haw. 1995)．[43]同上注。[44]See Janis Mary Gomez, “The Potential Double Jeopardy Implications of Administrative License Revocation”, Emory Law Journal , Winter 1997.[45]See Micky Sadoff, Get MADD Again, America! 7 (1991)．[46]See Eric Pianin, “Bill Urges Suspending Drunk Drivers’ Licenses。 Federal Highway Trust Funds Would Be Offered as Incentive”, Wash. Post,May 12, 1988, at B4.[47]See Nina J. Sines and John Ekman，“Double Jeopardy: A New Tool in the Arsenal of Drunk Driving Defense”, Wisconsin Lawyer, December,1995[48]同前注[5], Stephanie Ann Miyoshi文。[49]://en. , last visit on 18/09/2010.[50]See Bruce L. Benson, David W. Rasmussen and Brent D. Mast，“Deterring Drunk Driving Fatalities: An Economics of Crime Perspective”, International Review of Law and Economics”, June, 1999[51], last visit on 18/09/2010.[52]參見時(shí)延安：《遏制嚴(yán)重違章駕車事件，最終依靠綜合治理》，《中國社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào)》2009年8月18日第7版。[53]參見孫萬懷：《反對違法交通行為的過度立法與司法的犯罪化》，《中國社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào)》2009年8月18日第7版。[54]See Teresa W. Cams, Michael G. Hotchkin and Elaine M. Andrews, “Therapeutic Justice in Alaska’s Courts”, 19 ALASKA L. REV. 1，5(2002)[55]See NAT’L TRANSP. SAFETY BD, Safety Report: Actions to Reduce Fatalities,Injuries, and Crashes Involving the Hard Core Drinking Driver vii (2000)．[56]See Jennifer L. Tampoya, “What Works, What Doesn’t: Revising DUI Laws in West VIRGINIA to Reduce Recidivism and Save Lives”, West Virginia Law Review, Fall, 2008.[57], last visit on 18/09/2010.[58]同前注[53]，孫萬懷文。出處:《法學(xué)》2011年第2期第 13 頁 共 13 頁
合同協(xié)議相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1