freepeople性欧美熟妇, 色戒完整版无删减158分钟hd, 无码精品国产vα在线观看DVD, 丰满少妇伦精品无码专区在线观看,艾栗栗与纹身男宾馆3p50分钟,国产AV片在线观看,黑人与美女高潮,18岁女RAPPERDISSSUBS,国产手机在机看影片

正文內(nèi)容

英語(yǔ)議論文寫(xiě)作ppt課件-資料下載頁(yè)

2025-05-02 00:05本頁(yè)面
  

【正文】 tains phytochemicals called isoflavones, which supposedly have diseasepreventing properties. ? 并且 , 作者的結(jié)論是基于通過(guò)對(duì)比北美和亞洲人的飲食得出單靠飲食就可以防止疲勞和抑郁這一觀點(diǎn)得出的 。 然而單一的飲食因素就能夠解釋兩大人群中疲勞和抑郁的比例巨大差異是很不可能的 。 其他因素如生活方式 、 職業(yè) 、 城市還是郊區(qū)居住以及壓力水平可能影響更大 。此外 , 作者描述了大豆含有異黃酮的植物化學(xué)物質(zhì) , 該物質(zhì)假定有防病功效 。 Model essay ? Evidence 3論據(jù) 3 ? What is not stated, however, is whether these isoflavones are contained in a form in soy that is usable by the human body. It is possible that the particular configuration of the phytochemicals found in soy products is not usable by the human body, thereby producing no beneficial effects by people eating more soy products. In and of themselves, isoflavones may prevent certain diseases, but perhaps those found in soy are of no benefit to humans. By failing to address these possibilities, the arguer has presented an unconvincing argument. ? 然而還有一點(diǎn)沒(méi)有提及 , 就是以大豆形式存在的異黃酮是否可以被人體利用 。 可能在大豆產(chǎn)品中找到的植物化學(xué)物質(zhì)的具體配置不能被人踢利用 , 那么人們使用更多的豆制品沒(méi)有一處 。 ? Conclusion 結(jié)論 ? In summary, the argument fails due to four major flaws in logic. First, diseasepreventing properties does not mean fatigue and depression preventing properties. Secondly, fatigue and depression may not even be considered as diseases. Thirdly, the arguer ignores the probability that diet alone is not the sole reason behind the increased rates of fatigue and depression for North Americans as opposed to Asians. Finally, isoflavones as found in soy may not produce the same beneficial effects as when it is found in other forms. To strengthen the argument and conclusion, the arguer should present evidence that directly links diet to fatigue and depression as well as evidence that shows that soy can specifically prevent chronic fatigue and chronic depression in North Americans. ? 總之 , 作者由于邏輯中四個(gè)主要錯(cuò)誤而導(dǎo)致了論證失敗 。 首先 , 防病功能不等于防治 “ 疲勞和抑郁功能 。 ” 其次 , 疲勞和抑郁可能都不被看做是疾病 。 再次 , 作者護(hù)士了對(duì)比亞洲人北美人的疲勞和抑郁高發(fā)生率的背后飲食很可能不是單一的因素 。 最后 , 大豆中發(fā)現(xiàn)的異黃酮以其他形式存在時(shí)可能不會(huì)產(chǎn)生同樣的有益功效 。 為了強(qiáng)化論證及結(jié)論 , 醉著應(yīng)該拿出證據(jù)證明飲食和疲勞抑郁的直接聯(lián)系并且有證據(jù)表明大豆針對(duì)北美人中的疲勞和抑郁有確切的功效 。
點(diǎn)擊復(fù)制文檔內(nèi)容
試題試卷相關(guān)推薦
文庫(kù)吧 www.dybbs8.com
備案圖鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1