【文章內(nèi)容簡介】 ates LLC, 2023 Measurement Objectives Definitions ? Representative samples prise individuals or teams who, as groups, have certain work capability levels critical to pany performance ? An index prises a set of variables used to measure the work capability of a repr. sample ? Indexes measure a sample‘s work capability levels against validated normative standards ? Standards stipulate current and future work capability levels defined in harmony with requisite HR deliverables. Copyright Laske and Associates LLC, 2023 Steps in Building a Capability Metric Copyright 169。 Laske and Associates, LLC, 2023 H R C O N C ER N S I n de xe s W O R K C A P A B IL IT Y H R D ELI V ER A BLE S R e pr e s e n t a t i v e S a m pl eC O R P O R A T ES T R A T E G YAs s e s s m e n t ofCa p abi l it y int e r m s of I n d e xVa r iab l e s How to Define a Representative Sample The Company Division A Division B Division C Target Population Sample Copyright Laske and Associates LLC, 2023 Note: Divisions can also be crossfunctional groups Structuring a Representative Sample Copyright Laske and Associates LLC, 2023 T YP E S OF S AM P L EA. P u r e S am p les B . M ix e d S am p l e s1. E x e c ut i v e t e a m o nl y ( = E ) 1. B a l a n c e d s a m p l e ( E , M , T ,I = 25% )2. M i dd l e m a n a ge m e n t [ gr o upl e a de r s ] o nl y ( = M )2. M a n a ge m e n t s a m p l e ( E = 10% ,M = 50% , T = 20% , I = 20% )3. C r i t i c a l t e a m s [ a n d t e a mm a n a ge r s ] o nl y ( = T )3. T e a m s a m p l e ( E = 0% , M = 30% ,T = 70% , I = 0% )4. I n d i vi du a l c o n t r i b uto r s o nl y ( = I ) 4. W o r kf o r c e s a m p l e ( E = 0% ,M = 30, T = 0% , I = 70 ) Indexes and Their Capability Standards ? A CDREM? ?Index‘ is entirely customizable。 it refers to any aspect of capability HR decides to measure ? An index measures capability levels with a focus on a particular enabler (. leadership) ? An index is posed of a set of pertinent variables each of which is associated with a standard (customized to pany strategy and HR concerns flowing therefrom) ? CDREM? capability standards derive from current social science research ? Each index measures all three time dimensions of work capability: current applied, current potential, and future potential capability. Copyright Laske and Associates LLC, 2023 Capability Indexes are Composed of MetaEnablers Measuring Capability Levels Six Classes of of MetaEnablers Any number of customized indexes 25 Capability Criteria Future Capability Current Capability Copyright 169。 Laske and Associates, LLC, 2023 Customized to Company Strategy Example: Variables of a Leadership and Change Flexibility Index ? Developmental level (16 levels) ? Developmental potential and risk ? Strength of plexity awareness (transformational capacity) ? Strength of systems thinking ? Self conduct – self concept – flexibility for change – need for power and control ? Task focus – autonomy – resourcefulness under stress – quality of planning and order ? Interpersonal perspective – empathy – helpfulness/supportiveness – capacity for affiliation ? Energy sinks (gaps between personal needs and aspirations) ? Culture climate index (gaps between Personal aspirations and actual anizational experience) Copyright 169。 Laske and Associates LLC, 2023 Future potential capability Current potential and applied capability Current and NearFuture Capability Standards Copyright Laske and Associates LLC, 2023 D i m ens i o n s o f C u rr ent C a p a b i l i t yF act o r s o fC u r r e n t Cap ab il it yP e r s on al Ne e d As p irat i on s O r g.E xp e r ie n c eS e lf C o n d u c t : h owpeop l e per c e iv eth e m s e lv e sT a s k F oc u s : h o wpeop l e per c e iv e th e irwor kI n ter pe r s o n a lP e r s pec t iv e : h owpeop l e per c e iv e th e irc o wor ke r sE n e r gy S in ks : g a psbetwe e n n e e d a n da s pi r a t io n sC ul t ur e C li m a teI n de x: g a ps betwe e na s pi r a t io n s a n d o r g .e x pe r i e n c eVali d a t e dm a n a ger ia ls t a n d ar d s o fp e r s on al a n de t h ical n e e d s t ob e s at is f ied b ywo r k( e . g . , dr iv e toa c hi e v e )Vali d a t e dm a n a ger ia ls t a n d ar d s o fas p irat i on s h e ldf o r owno r ga n i z at i on a lf u n c t i on i n g( e . g . , a s pi r e d toa c hi e v e m e nt )Vali d a t e dm a n a ger ia ls t a n d ar d s o fact u al e x p e r ie n c e o ft h e o r ga n i z a t i on( e . g . , e x per i e n c e o fm a n a g e m e n t‘ sa c hi e v e m e ntor i e n tat io n ) FarFuture Capability Standards Copyright 169。 Laske and Associates LLC, 2023 F act o r s o fF u t u r e P o t e n t i al Cap a b i l i t yM an i f e s t at i onL e v e l o f de v e l op m e nt a l m a t u r i t y 16 l e v e l s betwee n a g e s 20 100 , e a c ha s s oci a t e d w i t h a di f f e r e n t de g r e e o fl e a der s hi p c a pabil i t yNe a r f ut u r e de v e l op m e nt a l r i s k a n dpot e n t i a lL i ke l i hoo d o f a d v a n c i ng f r o mpr e s e n t l e v e l , g e t t i ng s t u c k a t pr e s e n tl e v e l , or r e gr e s s i ng f r o m l e v e lS t r e ng t h o f s y s t e m s t hi nk i ng Ov e r a l l c a pab i l i t y t o s e e t h eor g a ni z a t i o n s y s t e m i c a l l y , r a t h e rt h a n b y per s o n a l i z a t i o nS t r e ng t h o f c r i t i c a l v s . c on s t r u c t i v et oo l s ( t r a n s f o r m a t i o n a l c a pac i t y )B a l a n c e o f m