【文章內(nèi)容簡(jiǎn)介】
entations by Industry ? Aerospace Bell Helicopter . Navy ? Automotive Ford GM Volvo ? Chemical Occidental Chemical Novartis MacMillan Bloedel ? Consumer Goods (Durable) Baker Furniture Black amp。 Decker Bose Herman Miller ? Consumer Goods (NonDurable) 3M Ault Foods ? Consumer Goods (NonDurable) Coca Cola Eamp。J Galo Frito Lay ? High Tech 3COM Dell Digital Gateway Siemens ? Industrial Case Caterpillar Mercury Marine ? Medical Johnson amp。 Johnson BristolMeyers Squibb ? Metals Timken There Are a Number of APS Vendors. According to the Gartner Group, i2 Technologies and Manugistics Are the Leaders Today. Deloitte currently has established APS relationships with i2, Manugistics, SynQuest and Paragon. Damp。T has ERP partnerships with PeopleSoft, JDE Numetrix, Baan and SAP. Source: Gartner Group (03/26/99) Note from : The Table was deleted due to copyrights constraints. Refer to the Gartner Group database in for current information. 1999 Estimated Total SCM Market Share A s p e n4 . 6 %B a a n7 . 7 %i25 2 . 0 %N u m e t r i x2 . 9 %L o g i l i t y3 . 2 %M a n u g i s t i c s2 0 . 3 %S A P5 . 2 %S y n Q u e s t4 . 1 %Source: Benchmarking Partners, Inc. 1999 Estimated % Share of Market Leaders By Vertical I ndu s t r i a lC om pa ny A ut o C P G O i l amp。 G a s H i gh Te c h D i s c r e t e O t he r Tot a lA s p e n T e c n o l o g y 6 . 7 % 2 . 2 % 2 8 . 0 % 3 . 3 % 0 . 7 % 1 . 3 % 4 . 6 %B a a n S C S 1 4 . 8 % 6 . 9 % 4 . 9 % 4 . 7 % 2 6 . 8 % 6 . 3 % 7 . 7 %i 2 T e c h n o l o g i e s 3 2 . 6 % 2 7 . 9 % 1 3 . 3 % 7 2 . 0 % 2 2 . 5 % 7 3 . 4 % 5 1 . 9 %J . D . E d w a r d s / N u m e t r i x 1 . 5 % 5 . 7 % 5 . 6 % 0 . 4 % 5 . 1 % 3 . 0 % 2 . 9 %L o g i l i t y 1 . 5 % 5 . 5 % 7 . 0 % 0 . 5 % 5 . 1 % 3 . 9 % 3 . 2 %M a n u g i s t i c s 2 2 . 3 % 4 4 . 5 % 3 6 . 4 % 1 4 . 1 % 1 4 . 6 % 0 . 0 % 2 0 . 3 %S A P S C M I 4 . 4 % 5 . 9 % 4 . 8 % 2 . 2 % 7 . 4 % 9 . 6 % 5 . 2 %S y n Q u e s t 1 6 . 2 % 1 . 5 % 0 . 0 % 2 . 9 % 1 7 . 9 % 2 . 4 % 4 . 1 %Source: Benchmarking Partners Inc. 1999 Estimated % Growth by Vertical 19981999 I ndu s t r i a lC om pa ny A ut o C P G O i l amp。 G a s H i gh Te c h D i s c r e t e O t he r Tot a lA s p e n T e c n o l o g y 0 . 4 % 0 . 0 % 1 . 3 % 0 . 4 % 0 . 7 % 0 . 3 % 0 . 3 %B a a n S C S 0 . 5 % 2 . 4 % 0 . 7 % 0 . 1 % 0 . 1 % 1 . 6 % 0 . 3 %i 2 T e c h n o l o g i e s 1 . 8 % 9 . 6 % 2 . 1 % 0 . 4 % 0 . 5 % 1 . 7 % 3 . 4 %J . D . E d w a r d s / N u m e t r i x 0 . 3 % 0 . 5 % 0 . 3 % 0 . 1 % 1 . 1 % 0 . 7 % 0 . 5 %L o g i l i t y 0 . 4 % 0 . 8 % 0 . 7 % 0 . 2 % 1 . 4 % 0 . 8 % 0 . 7 %M a n u g i s t i c s 6 . 5 % 1 4 . 2 % 5 . 6 % 1 . 2 % 4 . 9 % 0 . 0 % 5 . 6 %S A P S C M I 2 . 1 % 3 . 1 % 2 . 6 % 1 . 0 % 3 . 4 % 4 . 7 % 2 . 6 %S y n Q u e s t 3 . 1 % 0 . 4 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 4 % 2 . 9 % 0 . 5 % 0 . 8 %Source: Benchmarking Partners Inc. 1999 Assessment in the Consumer Packaged Goods Industry B us i ne s s P r oc e s s V a l ue A s pe n B a a n i2 J D E Lo gi l i t y M a nu gi s t i c s S A P S y nQ ue s tS t r a t e g i c P l a n n i n g 2D e m a n d P l a n n i n g 1M a s t e r D e m a n d S u p p l y P l a n n i n g 2M a s t e r P r o d u c t i o n P l a n n i n g 3D i s t r i b u t i o n P l a n n i n g 1P r o d u c t i o n S c h e d u l i n g D i s c r e t e 3P r o d u c t i o n S c h e d u l i n g P r o c e s s 3P r o d u c t i o n S e q u e n c i n g 5 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NRT r a n s p o r t a t i o n P l a n n i n g 2T r a n s p o r t a t i o n R o u t i n g 3C o m m a n d amp。 C o n t r o l 3D e m a n d Fu l f i l l m e n t 2D e m a n d C o l l a b o r a t i o n 3S u p p l y C o l l a b o r a t i o n 4V E N D O R L E G E N D V A L U E L E G E N D = B e s t i n C l a s s 1 = C r i t i c a l = S tr o n g F u n c ti o n a l i ty 2 = V e r y I m p o r t a n t = A d e q u a te F u n c ti o n a l i ty 3 = A v e r a g e = W e a k F u n c ti o n a l i ty 4 = M i n o r = N o n e x i s te n t 5 = N o t R e l e v a n tN