【正文】
s not the intention of the designers. 社交網(wǎng)站:定義、歷史以及內(nèi)涵 作者: danah m. boyd, Nicole B. Ellison 計(jì)算機(jī)通訊 ,第 13卷 ,第一期 ,第 230 210頁(yè) ,2021年 10月 社交網(wǎng)站:定義 我們將社交網(wǎng)絡(luò)定義為基于網(wǎng)絡(luò)的服務(wù),允許個(gè)人( 1)在一個(gè)有界系統(tǒng)內(nèi)建立一個(gè)公開(kāi)或半公開(kāi)的個(gè)人檔案,( 2)闡明與他們共享一個(gè)連接的其他用戶(hù)的列表,和( 3)查看和導(dǎo)線(xiàn)連接和其他系統(tǒng)內(nèi)的用戶(hù)清單。 Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship danah m. boyd, Nicole B. Ellison Journal of ComputerMediated Communication, Volume 13, Issue 1, pages 210–230, October 2021 Social Network Sites: Definition We define social work sites as webbased services that allow individuals to (1) construct a public or semipublic profile within a bounded system, (2) articulate a list of other users with whom they share a connection, and (3) view and traverse their list of connections and those made by others within the system. The nature and nomenclature of these connections may vary from site to site. While we use the term ―social work site‖ to describe this phenomenon, the term ―social working sites‖ also appears in public discourse, and the two terms are often used interchangeably. We chose not to employ the term ―working‖ for two reasons: emphasis and scope. ―Networking‖ emphasizes relationship initiation, often between strangers. While working is possible on these sites, it is not the primary practice on many of them, nor is it what differentiates them from other forms of putermediated munication (CMC). What makes social work sites unique is not that they allow individuals to meet strangers, but rather that they enable users to articulate and make visible their social works. This can result in connections between individuals that would not otherwise be made, but that is often not the goal, and these meetings are frequently between ―latent ties‖ (Haythornthwaite, 2021) who share some offline connection. On many of the large SNSs, participants are not necessarily ―working‖ or looking to meet new people。 instead, they are primarily municating with people who are already a part of their extended social work. To emphasize this articulated social work as a critical anizing feature of these sites, we label them ―social work sites.‖ While SNSs have implemented a wide variety of technical features, their backbone consists of visible profiles that display an articulated list of Friends1 who are also users of the system. Profiles are unique pages where one can ―type oneself into being‖ (Sund233。這些聯(lián)系的性質(zhì)和命名可能因?yàn)榫W(wǎng)站不同而存在差異。我們選擇不選擇“網(wǎng)絡(luò)化”一詞的原因有二:著重和范圍。雖然網(wǎng)絡(luò)是有可能在這些網(wǎng)站上,它是不是其中最重要的做法,也不是它區(qū)別于其他形式的電腦中介傳播( CMC)。這可能會(huì)導(dǎo)致人與人之間的聯(lián)系無(wú)法實(shí)現(xiàn),但這往往不是目標(biāo),這些聯(lián)系經(jīng)常是一些分享一些脫機(jī)聯(lián)系的“關(guān)系鏈”( Haythornthwaite 2021年)。為了強(qiáng)將這些網(wǎng)站視為一個(gè)重要的組織功能的社交網(wǎng)絡(luò),我們將他們成為“社交網(wǎng)絡(luò)”。資料是獨(dú)特的網(wǎng)頁(yè),