【正文】 敘述。比如，敘述有時(shí)間順序的事件或文獻(xiàn)，最早的文獻(xiàn)可用AA advocated it for the first BB further demonstrated that.注意句子上下連貫，不能讓句子獨(dú)立。We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.SCI論文全攻略之構(gòu)思與撰文(1)反駁審稿人意見的范文Dear Editor,As the corresponding author, I received an which informed me that our manuscript (Ref: ……) has been rejected. A referee’s report, as a standard procedure, has been attached to it.I have not the slightest grudge against the rejection. However, the referee’s report is quite unconvincing, or, if I may say, somewhat irresponsible. I understand that ||| is an honorable organization which has a distinct reputation of being most conscientious toward all the submissions around the world. Those careless remarks in the report might jeopardize the good image which ||| has been well upholding. So I consider it a selfimposed obligation to point it out.Just for the sake of argument, please allow me to cite the first and the only referee’s report below.小木蟲論壇四、關(guān)于論文的總體審查意見1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.2. This is a wellwritten paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of – because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of .6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to municate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving ments from the reviewers.2. Dear Dr. A:Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of . We have chosen this journal because it deals with . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.文章稿號), since the copyright agreement for publication has been sent to you two months ago. I am just wondering that how long I can receive the proof of our manuscript from you?I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time for a reply. I am very pleased to hear from you very much for your sincerely,Corresponding author:Name: Email: 七、文章校稿信件Dear Mr. :Thanks very much for your kind letter about the proof of our paper titled “Paper Title” (ID:文章稿號) for publication in “Journal Name”. We have finished the proof reading and checking carefully, and some corrections about the proof and the answers to the queries are provided below. Corrections:1. In ****** should be **** (Page ***, Right column, line***)2. In **** the “*****” should be “****” (Page ****, Right column, line****)Answers for “author queries”:1. *********************.2. **********************3. **********************We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything els