【正文】
s body belongs to himself, although he died ,the right to process the corpse should be given to the deceased’s is a performance of inherited enforced donation undoubtedly breaks the inherited reason why the donation is forced is that the organ is rare and so many patients need ,money is also need urgently,should people donate their heritage to the State? Obviously say NO!They are all voluntary will of the parties,the donation would bee we can not control our body,where are the human rights?If we can not dominate our money freely, what is the necessity of wills? Is it a wastepaper? The State makes the law to give us rights to protect ourselves from he prevents us to use our rights?Where is the equity? Why we can’t freely make our decisions?Who can give you the rights to robber our body without our consent?Finally, please debaters explain to us how can the State deal with these people who don’t want to donate their bodies? Directly forced occupying without any ments? Are there not any other more moderate ways get the same effect? What is “should be given”?That is to say,people’s corpse must be given to the State after his death,no matter whether he is willing or ,where are our rights?So we insist that upon death ,each person’s body should not be given to the State for