freepeople性欧美熟妇, 色戒完整版无删减158分钟hd, 无码精品国产vα在线观看DVD, 丰满少妇伦精品无码专区在线观看,艾栗栗与纹身男宾馆3p50分钟,国产AV片在线观看,黑人与美女高潮,18岁女RAPPERDISSSUBS,国产手机在机看影片

正文內(nèi)容

電力企業(yè)辯論賽反方一辯(參考版)

2024-10-17 23:46本頁(yè)面
  

【正文】 s body belongs to himself, although he died ,the right to process the corpse should be given to the deceased’s is a performance of inherited enforced donation undoubtedly breaks the inherited reason why the donation is forced is that the organ is rare and so many patients need ,money is also need urgently,should people donate their heritage to the State? Obviously say NO!They are all voluntary will of the parties,the donation would bee we can not control our body,where are the human rights?If we can not dominate our money freely, what is the necessity of wills? Is it a wastepaper? The State makes the law to give us rights to protect ourselves from he prevents us to use our rights?Where is the equity? Why we can’t freely make our decisions?Who can give you the rights to robber our body without our consent?Finally, please debaters explain to us how can the State deal with these people who don’t want to donate their bodies? Directly forced occupying without any ments? Are there not any other more moderate ways get the same effect? What is “should be given”?That is to say,people’s corpse must be given to the State after his death,no matter whether he is willing or ,where are our rights?So we insist that upon death ,each person’s body should not be given to the State for
點(diǎn)擊復(fù)制文檔內(nèi)容
公司管理相關(guān)推薦
文庫(kù)吧 www.dybbs8.com
備案圖鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1