公司并購防御的法律規(guī)制介紹(參考版)
2025-06-25 00:33本頁面
【正文】 [xi] 例如,董事會采取行動的主要目的是為了維護(hù)公司的利益還是為了加強董事的地位? [xii]參見Lipton ,“Takeover Bids in the Target’s Boardroom”,35 Bus Law. 101 ,124 ,1979. [xiii] 參見Ralph C. Ferrare ,Meredith M. Brown ,John H. Hal Takeovers Attack and Survival ,A Strategist’s Mannal ,Butterwoiths ,1987 ,P. 279. [xiv] 參見Ralph C. Ferrara ,Meredith M. Brown ,John H. Hal Takeovers Attack and Survival ,A Strategist’s Mannal ,Butterwoiths ,1987 ,PP. 291～293. [xv] 參見John H. Farrar ,“Business J udgment and Defensive Tactics in Hostile Takeover Bids”, Institutional Investors ,Takeoverand Modernization of Corporate Law ,Oxford University Press ,1993 ,P. 363. [xvi] 參見Ralph C. Ferrara ,Meredith M. Brown ,John H. Hal Takeovers Attack and Survival ,A Strategist’s Mannal ,Butterwoiths ,1987 ,PP. 301～302. [xvii] 參見Ralph C. Ferrara ,Meredith M. Brown ,John H. Hal Takeovers Attack and Survival ,A Strategist’s Mannal ,Butterwoiths ,1987 ,P. 305.15 / 15。 [iv] 參見R. Hessen ,“A new concept of corporations :A contractual and private property view”,Vol. 30 ,Hastings Law Journal ,1979 ,P. 132. [v] 參見Mark J . Wright ,Corporate Governance and Directors’Social Responsibilities :Resporisible Inefficiency or IrresponsibleEfficiency ? 17 Business Law Review August/ September ,1996 ,P. 176. [vi] 參見F. H. Easterbrook and D. R. Fichel ,“The Corporate Contract”,Vol. 98 ,Columbia Law Review ,1989 , PP. 1416～1417. [vii] 參見Robert W. Hamilton ,“Corporations”,Fifth Edition ,West . Pub. Co. P. 1184. [viii] 參見Easterbrook amp。 注釋: [i] 參見[ 英]Mark J . Wright ,Corporate Governance and Directors’Social Responsibilities : Resporisible Inefficiency or Irresponsible Efficiency ? 17 Business Law Review August/ September ,1996 ,P. 174. [ii] [美]科斯:《企業(yè)、市場和法律》,上海三聯(lián)書店1
職業(yè)教育相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1