【正文】 B suggestor On the contrary (表明前面的觀點錯誤，如果只是表明兩種對立的觀點，用in contrast)， BB.. 如果兩種觀點相近,可用AA suggestSimilarily, alternatively, BB..Or Also, BBor BB allso does ..表示因果或者前后關系，可用Consequently, therefore, as a result,表明遞進關系，可用furthermore, further, moreover, in addition,當寫完一段英文，最好首先檢查一下是否較好地應用了這些連接詞。2) 段落的整體邏輯經(jīng)常我們要敘述一個問題的幾個方面。這種情況下，一定要注意邏輯結構。首先第一段要明確告訴讀者你要討論幾個部份 ...Therefore, there are three aspects of this problen have tobe addressed.The first questuon involves...The second problem relates toThe thrid aspect deals with...上面的例子可以清晰地把觀點逐層敘述。Or, 可以直接用First, Second, Third...Finally,..當然,Furthermore, in addition等可以用來補充說明。3) 討論部份的整體結構小標題是比較好的方法把要討論的問題分為幾個片段。一般第一個片段指出文章最為重要的數(shù)據(jù)與結論。補充說明的部份可以放在最后一個片段。 一定要明白文章的讀者會分為多個檔次。文章除了本專業(yè)的專業(yè)人士讀懂以外，一定要想辦法能讓更多的外專業(yè)人讀懂。所以可以把討論部份分為兩部份，一部份提出觀點，另一部份詳細介紹過程以及論述的依據(jù)。這樣專業(yè)外的人士可以了解文章的主要觀點，比較專業(yè)的討論他可以把它當成黑箱子，而這一 部份本專業(yè)人士可以進一步研究。為了使文章清楚，第一次提出概念時，最好加以個括弧，給出較為詳細的解釋。如果文章用了很多的Abbreviation, 兩種方法加以解決1) 在文章最好加上個Appendix，把所有Abreviation列表2) 在不同的頁面上，不時地給出Abbreciation的含義，用來提醒讀者?？傊瑢懳恼碌哪康氖且屪x者讀懂，讀得清晰，并且采取各種措施方便于讀者。一定要注意絕對不能全面否定前人的成果，即使在你看來前人的結論完全不對。這是前人工作最起碼的尊重，英文叫做給別人的工作credits.所以文章不要出現(xiàn)非常negative的評價，比如Their resultsare wrong, very questionable, have no mensence, etc.遇到這類情況，可以婉轉地提出：Their studies may be more reasonable if they hadconsidered this situation.Their results could be better convinced if they ...Or Their conclusion may remain some uncertanties. 討論部份還包括什么內容?1. 主要數(shù)據(jù)特征的總結2. 主要結論以及與前人觀點的對比3. 本文的不足第三點，在一般作者看來不可取。事實上給出文章的不足恰恰是保護自己文章的重要手段。如果刻意隱藏文章的漏洞，覺得別人看不出來，是非常不明智的。所謂不足，包括以下內容:1. 研究的問題有點片面討論時一定要說，It should be noted that this study has examined only..We concentrate (focus) on only...We have to point out that we do not..Some limitations of this study are...2. 結論有些不足The results do not imply,The results can not be used to determinebe taken as evidence of Unfortunately, we can not determien this from this dataOur results are lack of ...但是，在指出這些不足之后，隨后一定要再一次加強本文的重要性以及可能采取的手段來解決這些不足，為別人或者自己的下一步研究打下浮筆。Notwithstading its limitation, this tudy does suggest.. However, these problems culd be solved if we consdierDespite its preliminary character, this study can clearly indicate..用中文來說，這一部份是左右逢源。把審稿人想到的問題提前給一個交代，同時表明你已經(jīng)在思考這些問題，但是由于文章長度，試驗進度或者試驗手段的制約，暫時不能回答這些問題。但是，這些通過你的一些建議，這些問題在將來的研究中游可能實現(xiàn)。Title: Fault diagnosis research based on timefrequency analysis method in rotor systemsJournal of Sound and VibrationDear student ,We have now received ments on your manuscript from the reviewers (reports included below). Please revise your manuscript according to the referee39。s suggestions and detail all the changes which you have made. I hope you will be prepared to undertake this, and I will then be pleased to reconsider the manuscript for publication. Please note that due to the extensive revisions necessay on your manuscript, it will need to be sent out for rereview. If you do decide to revise the paper, we need to receive your new manuscript within the next six months. You are asked to submit the following items along with the manuscript:(1) A pointbypoint reply that we can send to each reviewer。(2) A separate list of the revisions made to the manuscript.It is important that you address all the issues raised by the referees, either by revision or reasoned rebuttal, before we make a decision on publication.When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (. Word). Uploading only a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication.If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them.To submit a revision, please go to Your username is: ********Your password is: **************On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled Submissions Needing Revision. You will find your submission record there.Yours sincerely,Richard BerrymanEditorial Office (Australasia)Journal of Sound and VibrationReviewers39。 ments:Reviewer 1: Comments on JSVD0601203Title: Fault diagnosis research based on timefrequency method in rotor systemsBy: , and _______________________________________The paper presents an application of reassigned wavelet scalogram for rotor system fault diagnosis. It is a topic of interest to the researchers in the related areas but the paper needs very significant improvement before acceptance for publication. My detailed ments are as follows: 1. The wavelet method (reassigned wavelet scalogram) used in the paper works very well for the underlying fault diagnosis problem. On the other hand, this wavelet method is a wellestablished method, and the present research is a direct application of this method without new contribution in methodological research. 2. For the above reason, the presentation should be focused on the results. Unfortunately, the presentation is far from acceptable for publication. The material was not properly organized and it is strongly suggested that the authors check carefully the English writing and use standard terminologies in the technical area.3. The title of the paper should be more specific since numerous studies have been done on the fault diagnosis of rotor systems using wavelets and timefrequency methods. Also, remove the word research.4. On Section 1: This section listed many references that are mainly related to rotor dynamics and are not directly related to rotor system diagnosis. If the authors would like to keep these references, some discussions on the relevance of these refs to the present research are needed. Review on the directly relevant refs will be more helpful for the reader. Also, timefrequency and wavelets are mainly for nonstationary and transient analysis. The author may discuss in more detail what types of transients and nonstationary ponents would appear in rotor system vibration.