【正文】 ，如全部的實驗原始數(shù)據(jù)、計算機軟件程序等。這種形式曾經(jīng)是投稿的近乎唯一的方式，持續(xù)了漫長的歲月，可現(xiàn)在采用這種方式接受來稿的刊物越來越少了。the overall quality of the English language is rather poor。Reviewers have now mented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.(3) 需要采用表格和圖件形式展示(數(shù)據(jù))材料。附1：中譯審稿意見審稿意見—1(1) 英文表達太差，盡管意思大致能表達清楚，但文法錯誤太多。the journal39。 only then can a proper review be performed. Most sentences contain grammatical and/or spelling mistakes or are not plete sentences.◆ As presented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal. There are problems with sentence structure, verb tense, and clause construction. ◆ The English of your manuscript must be improved before resubmission. We strongly suggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague who is wellversed in English or whose native language is English.◆ Please have someone petent in the English language and the subject matter of your paper go over the paper and correct it. ?◆ the quality of English needs improving. 來自編輯的鼓勵：Encouragement from reviewers:◆ I would be very glad to rereview the paper in greater depth once it has been edited because the subject is interesting. ◆ There is continued interest in your manuscript titled …… which you submitted to the Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: Part B Applied Biomaterials.◆ The Submission has been greatly improved and is worthy of publication.對某個概念或工具使用的rationale/定義概念： What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume ratio?對研究問題的定義： Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear, write one section to define the problem如何凸現(xiàn)原創(chuàng)性以及如何充分地寫literature review: The topic is novel but the application proposed is not so novel.對claim,如A＞B的證明，verification: There is no experimental parison of the algorithm with previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an improvement on previous work.嚴謹度問題： MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove that. 1格式（重視程度）：◆ In addition, the list of references is not in our style. It is close but not pletely correct. I have attached a pdf file with Instructions for Authors which shows examples. ◆ Before submitting a revision be sure that your material is properly prepared and formatted. If you are unsure, please consult the formatting nstructions to authors that are given under the Instructions and Forms button in he upper righthand corner of the screen.1語言問題（出現(xiàn)最多的問題）：有關語言的審稿人意見：◆ It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader. ◆ The authors must have their work reviewed by a proper translation/reviewing service before submission。 Apparently， Obviously ,Innovation ,refine ,In my humble opinion如果仍然有需要修改的小毛病，一般你可以用you paper has been conditionally accepted. Please revise .....according to review ments.如果是接受，你可以用We are very pleased to inform you that your paper xxxxx has been accepted by [journal name]. Please prepare your paper by journal template...............At a first glance, this short manuscript seems an interesting piece ofwork, reporting on . Fine, good quality, but all this has been done and published, and nearly bee a wellknown phenomenon. Therefore, there is insufficient novelty or significance to meet publication criteria. Also, I did not see any expermental evidence how the ** is related with **, except for the handwaving qualitative discussion. Therefore, I cannot support its publication in JPD in its present form. It should be rejected.建議去小木蟲問問，那里有一些資源。 in front of most mentions of tiptilt system. This implies that there is only one system and the authors are using it exclusively. There are dozns of other misuses. Pages 2,3, 8,9,10,11, and 12 are littered with them. The paper is to difficult to read in its present form.感想：一篇好的論文，從內容到形式都需要精雕細琢。(2) 缺少支持作者發(fā)現(xiàn)的方法學分析。一是傳統(tǒng)的郵寄形式，即通過國際快件將論文的原稿郵寄給刊物的主編或編輯部。正文后的結尾部分有的文章附加致謝辭(ACKNOWLEDGEMENT)，有的則沒有，但參考文獻(REFERENCE)則是必須的。如果可能，最好請有這方面經(jīng)驗的作者上一課，可以節(jié)省時間和事半功倍。如題目、作者、摘要、關鍵詞、正文、圖表等。這樣造成的麻煩所耽誤的時間會更多。如果作者不能自行解決故障或問題反復出現(xiàn)，作者可與出版社的網(wǎng)上投稿支持部門聯(lián)系，求得幫助。目的是看原稿是否包含了應該有的基本內容。原稿返回編輯部送審后，有的會很干脆地被拒絕，有的會順利地圓滿接受，但大部分原稿需按審稿人的意見進行規(guī)模不同的修改。這種張冠李戴的事在網(wǎng)上投稿過程中時有發(fā)生。比如R1是第一次修改稿，R2是第二份修改稿，依此類推。今后，這樣的期刊可能會越來越多。 7. required review pleted 審稿結束，等編輯處理。 還有個狀態(tài)是Rejected。為了減少這種爭論，在前言的結尾你就要明確提出本文研究的范圍：1)時間尺度問題如果你的問題涉及比較長的時序，你可以明確地提出本文只關心這 一時間范圍的問題。5) 如果自己對所提出的觀點不完全肯定，可用 We tentatively put forward (interrprete this to..)Or The results may be due to (caused by) attributed torsulted from..Or This is probably a consequence ofIt seems that .. can account for (interpret) this..Or It is pisible that it stem from...連接詞與邏輯 寫英文論文最常見的一個毛病就是文章的邏輯不清楚。一般第一個片段指出文章最為重要的數(shù)據(jù)與結論。 一定要明白文章的讀者會分為多個檔次。這是前人工作最起碼的尊重，英文叫做給別人的工作credits.所以文章不要出現(xiàn)非常negative的評價，比如Their resultsare wrong, very questionable, have no mensence, etc.遇到這類情況，可以婉轉地提出：Their studies may be more reasonable if they hadconsidered this situation.Their results could be better convinced if they ...Or Their conclusion may remain some uncertanties. 討論部份還包括什么內容?1. 主要數(shù)據(jù)特征的總結2. 主要結論以及與前人觀點的對比3. 本文的不足第三點，在一般作者看來不可取。s suggestions and detail all the changes which you have made. I hope you will be prepared to undertake this, and I will then be pleased to reconsider the manuscript for publication. Please note that due to the extensive revisions necessay on your manuscript, it will need to be sent out for rereview. If you do decide to revise the paper, we need to receive your new manuscript within the next six months. You are asked to submit the following items along with the manuscript:(1) A pointbypoint reply that we can send to each review