【正文】 s not published, but also the description is very rough. It is impossible to replicate the experiment and verify the claim of the author. Furthermore, almost no discussion for the experimental result is given. . why the author would obtain this result? Which ponent is the most important? Any further improvement? it is good concept, but need to polish layout, language. Apparently， Obviously ,Innovation ,refine ,In my humble opinion如果仍然有需要修改的小毛病，一般你可以用you paper has been conditionally accepted. Please revise .....according to review ments.如果是接受，你可以用We are very pleased to inform you that your paper xxxxx has been accepted by [journal name]. Please prepare your paper by journal template...............At a first glance, this short manuscript seems an interesting piece ofwork, reporting on . Fine, good quality, but all this has been done and published, and nearly bee a wellknown phenomenon. Therefore, there is insufficient novelty or significance to meet publication criteria. Also, I did not see any expermental evidence how the ** is related with **, except for the handwaving qualitative discussion. Therefore, I cannot support its publication in JPD in its present form. It should be rejected.建議去小木蟲問問，那里有一些資源。s copy editors should not have to fix the many remaining errors. I sympathize that Chinese languages do not have an equivalent of English articles 39。 and don39。s English expert decided to insert the word 39。 in front of most mentions of tiptilt system. This implies that there is only one system and the authors are using it exclusively. There are dozns of other misuses. Pages 2,3, 8,9,10,11, and 12 are littered with them. The paper is to difficult to read in its present form.感想：一篇好的論文，從內(nèi)容到形式都需要精雕細琢。(2) 文獻綜述較差，觀點或論斷應有文獻支持。(4) 該模式的創(chuàng)新性并非如作者所述，目前有許多XX采取此模式（如美國地球物理學會），作者應詳加調(diào)查并分析XXX運作模式的創(chuàng)新點。(2) 寫作質(zhì)量達不到美國學術期刊的標準。(2) 缺少支持作者發(fā)現(xiàn)的方法學分析。附2：英文審稿意見(略有刪節(jié))Reviewer: 1There are many things wrong with this paper.The English is very bad. Although the meaning is by and large clear, not too many sentences are correct.The literature review is poor. The paper is riddled with assertions and claims that should be supported by references.The paper reads as an advertisement for XXX. It is not clear that the author is independent of XXX.The AA model of XXX is not as innovative as the author claims. There are now many XX that follow this model (American Geophysical Union, for example), and the author should survey these model to see which one first introduced the elements of the XXX model.The model is also not as successful as the author claims. ……Overall, the presentation and the contents of the paper can only mean that I reject that the paper be rejected.Reviewer: 2The are two major problems with this paper:(1) It is missing the context of (and citations to) what is now know as the twosided market literature including that directly related to … (. Braunstein, JASIS 1977。 Katsanakas, Mgt. Sci., 2006。 Snyder, . J Econ Analysis, 2007).(2) The writing quality is not up to the standard of a US scholarly journal.Reviewer: 31. The author should accentuate his contributions in this manuscript.2. It lacks analytical methodologies to support author’s discoveries.3. Description style material like this manuscript requires structured tables amp。39。2)some Figures must be selected from previous literature to discuss also the synthesis of anisotropically shaped Ag nanoparticles (there are several examples published), which has been largely overlooked throughout the paper. 。一是傳統(tǒng)的郵寄形式，即通過國際快件將論文的原稿郵寄給刊物的主編或編輯部。二是用電子郵件的方式投稿，即作者將原稿的電子文件發(fā)至主編或編輯部的電子信箱。目前采用這種納稿方式的期刊還很多，但有很大一部分期刊己經(jīng)在此基礎上，又進了一步，發(fā)展到第三種也是目前最新的一種投稿方式，即網(wǎng)上投稿 (ONLINE SUBMISSION)。一旦作者在網(wǎng)上登記注冊投稿，每個主要步驟都有記錄，很受科技期刊作者的歡迎。首先，作者對所要投稿的國際英文刊物的投稿需知(GUIDE FOR AUTHORS)要了解清楚，并且按照要求準備好原稿的所有文件。不同的文章類型，對原稿的格式要求也有所變化。正文后的結(jié)尾部分有的文章附加致謝辭(ACKNOWLEDGEMENT)，有的則沒有，但參考文獻(REFERENCE)則是必須的。現(xiàn)在有的刊物可以在網(wǎng)上發(fā)表的文章中附帶電子視聽文件(ECOMPONENTS)。作者要根據(jù)自身的情況，選擇文章應該包含的內(nèi)容，一旦確定，所有的內(nèi)容都要在網(wǎng)上投稿前準備好。否則，文章在初選階段會很快落選。如果可能，最好請有這方面經(jīng)驗的作者上一課，可以節(jié)省時間和事半功倍。從刊物的網(wǎng)頁入手，仔細閱讀網(wǎng)上的投稿需知、跟蹤鏈接或屏幕啟示，把每個環(huán)節(jié)搞明白弄清楚。實際上與網(wǎng)上購物注冊沒太大區(qū)別，關鍵是要把自己的姓名、單位、聯(lián)系地址，包括電話、傳真和電子郵箱等登記準確無誤。如題目、作者、摘要、關鍵詞、正文、圖表等。這聽起來并不難，但實際上作者在這方面的疏忽卻很多。有的文章作者完全忽略了刊物對關鍵詞的要求，隨心所欲。有些作者在輸入文件時過于匆忙，十個圖只輸入一半，這樣的稿件即使到了編輯部也不能送審，只能返回作者補漏。這樣造成的麻煩所耽誤的時間會更多。否則，稿件只會存儲在作者自已的文件夾中，而不是發(fā)到編輯部。在這個轉(zhuǎn)換過程中，計算機屏幕會呈停滯狀態(tài)，看上去好像死機了。原稿在網(wǎng)上成功投出后，作者馬上就能收到編輯部的回執(zhí)。如果作者不能自行解決故障或問題反復出現(xiàn)，作者可與出版社的網(wǎng)上投稿支持部門聯(lián)系，求得幫助。作者初學乍練時可以抽時間學習一下。 編輯部收到稿件后，有的是直接送審，有的是先進行一步初選(主要是檢查論文的英文是否過關)，然后再送審。目的是看原稿是否包含了應該有的基本內(nèi)容。一旦發(fā)現(xiàn)問題(比如原稿過長，關鍵詞不符合要求等)，原稿會馬上返回作者，進行必要的補充和修改。與此同時，作者的電子信箱內(nèi)同樣會收到一封編輯部的來信，明確告之稿件應該進行修改或補充的地方。一旦文件修改完畢，作者又要根據(jù)出版社信函中的提示，上網(wǎng)按步驟再將原稿發(fā)回刊物的編輯部。原稿返回編輯部送審后，有的會很干脆地被拒絕，有的會順利地圓滿接受，但大部分原稿需按審稿人的意見進行規(guī)模不同的修改。但有的作者在接到主編或編輯部轉(zhuǎn)來的審稿人意見后，對其評價有很大的異議或不愿改動自己的論文，便可以主動要求退稿。如果作者愿意根據(jù)審稿人的意見改動論文，則需改得全面徹底，并且對審稿人提出的疑問要一一做答。如果缺少這份問答文件，在許多期刊網(wǎng)上投發(fā)修改稿時會出現(xiàn)障礙，應引起作者的注意。這種張冠李戴的事在網(wǎng)上投稿過程中時有發(fā)生。修改過的稿件回到編輯部后，原稿的編碼序號不變，只是多了一或二個尾數(shù)，表明是修改稿。對被否定的文章，如果作者對否定的原因有異議，可以向編輯部或主編提出自己的意見，據(jù)理力爭。這種情況不多，但在網(wǎng)上這樣的文章也同樣記錄在案。比如R1是第一次修改稿，R2是第二份修改稿，依此類推。不單如此，整個審稿過程中經(jīng)過刊物網(wǎng)頁發(fā)給作者的電子郵件也都有記錄。 由此可見，網(wǎng)上投稿的好處的確很多，難怪深受廣大作者的歡迎。今后，這樣的期刊可能會越來越多。 一、投稿信1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML:I am sending a manuscript entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of .Yours sincerely2. Dear Dr. A:Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of . We have chosen this journal because it deals with . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.3. Dear Dr. A:Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.We appreciate