【正文】 都有記錄。修改過(guò)的稿件回到編輯部后，原稿的編碼序號(hào)不變，只是多了一或二個(gè)尾數(shù)，表明是修改稿。但有的作者在接到主編或編輯部轉(zhuǎn)來(lái)的審稿人意見(jiàn)后，對(duì)其評(píng)價(jià)有很大的異議或不愿改動(dòng)自己的論文，便可以主動(dòng)要求退稿。一旦發(fā)現(xiàn)問(wèn)題(比如原稿過(guò)長(zhǎng)，關(guān)鍵詞不符合要求等)，原稿會(huì)馬上返回作者，進(jìn)行必要的補(bǔ)充和修改。作者初學(xué)乍練時(shí)可以抽時(shí)間學(xué)習(xí)一下。否則，稿件只會(huì)存儲(chǔ)在作者自已的文件夾中，而不是發(fā)到編輯部。這聽(tīng)起來(lái)并不難，但實(shí)際上作者在這方面的疏忽卻很多。從刊物的網(wǎng)頁(yè)入手，仔細(xì)閱讀網(wǎng)上的投稿需知、跟蹤鏈接或屏幕啟示，把每個(gè)環(huán)節(jié)搞明白弄清楚?，F(xiàn)在有的刊物可以在網(wǎng)上發(fā)表的文章中附帶電子視聽(tīng)文件(ECOMPONENTS)。二是用電子郵件的方式投稿，即作者將原稿的電子文件發(fā)至主編或編輯部的電子信箱。附2：英文審稿意見(jiàn)(略有刪節(jié))Reviewer: 1There are many things wrong with this paper.The English is very bad. Although the meaning is by and large clear, not too many sentences are correct.The literature review is poor. The paper is riddled with assertions and claims that should be supported by references.The paper reads as an advertisement for XXX. It is not clear that the author is independent of XXX.The AA model of XXX is not as innovative as the author claims. There are now many XX that follow this model (American Geophysical Union, for example), and the author should survey these model to see which one first introduced the elements of the XXX model.The model is also not as successful as the author claims. ……Overall, the presentation and the contents of the paper can only mean that I reject that the paper be rejected.Reviewer: 2The are two major problems with this paper:(1) It is missing the context of (and citations to) what is now know as the twosided market literature including that directly related to … (. Braunstein, JASIS 1977。(2) 文獻(xiàn)綜述較差，觀(guān)點(diǎn)或論斷應(yīng)有文獻(xiàn)支持。s copy editors should not have to fix the many remaining errors. I sympathize that Chinese languages do not have an equivalent of English articles 39。 The paper is very annoying to read as it is riddled with grammatical errors and poorly constructed sentences. Furthermore, the novelty and motivation of the work is not well justified. Also, the experimental study is shallow. In fact, I cant figure out the legends as it is too small! How does your effort pares with stateoftheart?◆ In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study. ◆ Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided. 對(duì)于研究設(shè)計(jì)的rationale: Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design. 夸張地陳述結(jié)論/夸大成果/不嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)： The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.對(duì)hypothesis的清晰界定： A hypothesis needs to be presented。 The authors did a good job in motivating the problem studied in the introduction. The mathematic explanation of the proposed solutions is also nice. Furthermore, the paper is acpanied by an adequate set of experiments for evaluating the effectiveness of the solutions the authors propose. the39。審稿意見(jiàn)—3(1) 作者應(yīng)著重指出指出本人的貢獻(xiàn)。 figures for better presentations.Ms. Ref. No.: ******Title: ****** Materials Science and Engineering Dear Dr. ******,1) Once the above concerns are fully addressed, the manuscript could be accepted for publication in this journal.英文論文寫(xiě)作、投稿詳解(整理各大學(xué)術(shù)論壇相關(guān)帖子，轉(zhuǎn)帖) 目前科技論文作者向國(guó)際英文科技期刊投稿的方式有三種。本文將就網(wǎng)上投稿過(guò)程及作者應(yīng)該注意的地方予以詳細(xì)的介紹，供對(duì)此感興趣的中國(guó)作者參考。單就普通論文而言，文章從頭到尾的基本格式是：論文的開(kāi)篇部分，包括文章標(biāo)題(TITLE)，作者姓名(AUTHOR’S NAME)(注明通訊作者/CORRESPONDING AUTHOR)，作者單位地址(AFFILIATION)，論文摘要(ABSTRACT)，關(guān)鍵詞(KEYWORDS)等；論文的正文部分，包括介紹/引言(INTRODUCTION)，實(shí)驗(yàn)方法(METHOD)，實(shí)驗(yàn)材料(MATERIAL)，結(jié)果與分析(RESULTS AND ANALYSIS)，討論（DISCUSSION）, 結(jié)論（CONCLUSION）等；需說(shuō)明的是不同的學(xué)科，正文的內(nèi)容和形式會(huì)有所增減，圖表、公式的數(shù)量也會(huì)有所不同。其次，是作者對(duì)投稿刊物網(wǎng)上投稿系統(tǒng)的熟悉和學(xué)習(xí)。二是按部就班地輸入文章的各個(gè)主要部分。如果審校員一時(shí)疏忽或主編沒(méi)有查覺(jué)，將有缺欠的文章發(fā)出送審，則審稿人因?yàn)槿眻D，不能正常審閱文章。如果有問(wèn)題，屏幕上則會(huì)出現(xiàn)問(wèn)題預(yù)警或解決問(wèn)題的提示。不論是哪種情況，論文在送審前均需通過(guò)最基本的技術(shù)檢查。這個(gè)操作過(guò)程和最開(kāi)始的投稿大同小異，往往也要將DOC文件轉(zhuǎn)換成PDF文件。修改后的論文要從作者網(wǎng)上的論文文件夾里發(fā)給編輯部，最初的原稿可以存儲(chǔ)在文件夾中，可作者一定要確定第二次投出的稿件是修改后的文件，而不是初稿。在網(wǎng)上投出的稿件不論改動(dòng)多少回，其序號(hào)都不會(huì)改變，只有尾數(shù)的變動(dòng)，以表明是修改后的第幾稿?，F(xiàn)在有許多科技期刊已經(jīng)告別了郵寄和電子郵件的時(shí)代，開(kāi)始只受理網(wǎng)上投稿。 如果被邀請(qǐng)審稿人不想審，就會(huì)decline，編輯會(huì)重新邀請(qǐng)別的審稿人?？措s志的。如果處理不好，reviewer會(huì)提出嚴(yán)厲的建議，比如你沒(méi)有考慮某種可能性，某種研究手段等等。1)如果觀(guān)點(diǎn)不是這篇文章最新提出的，通常要用We confirm that...2)對(duì)于自己很自信的觀(guān)點(diǎn),可用We believe that...3)在更通常的情況下，由數(shù)據(jù)推斷出一定的結(jié)論，用， Results indicate, infer, suggest, imply that...4) 在及其特別的情況才可以用We put forward(discover, observe..) .. for the first time.來(lái)強(qiáng)調(diào)自己的創(chuàng)新。3) 討論部份的整體結(jié)構(gòu)小標(biāo)題是比較好的方法把要討論的問(wèn)題分為幾個(gè)片段。一定要注意絕對(duì)不能全面否定前人的成果，即使在你看來(lái)前人的結(jié)論完全不對(duì)。Title: Fault diagnosis research based on timefrequency analysis method in rotor systemsJournal of Sound and VibrationDear student ,We have now received ments on your manuscript from the reviewers (reports included below). Please revise your manuscript according to the referee39。 A f。(2) A separate list of the revisions made to the manuscript.It is important that you address all the issues raised by the referees, either by revision or reasoned rebuttal, before we make a decision on publication.When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (. Word). Uploading only a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication.事實(shí)上給出文章的不足恰恰是保護(hù)自己文章的重要手段。文章除了本專(zhuān)業(yè)的專(zhuān)業(yè)人士讀懂以外，一定要想辦法能讓更多的外專(zhuān)業(yè)人讀懂。補(bǔ)充說(shuō)明的部份可以放在最后一個(gè)片段。解決的方法有：1)句子上下要有連貫，不能讓句子之間獨(dú)立常見(jiàn)的連接詞語(yǔ)有, However, also, in addition, consequently, afterwards, moreover, Furthermore,further, although, unlike, in contrast, Similarly,Unfortunately, alternatively, parallel results,In order to, despite, For example, Compared withother results, thus, therefore...用好這些連接詞，能夠使觀(guān)點(diǎn)表達(dá)得有層次，更加明確。We preliminarily focus on the older (younger)...或者有兩種時(shí)間尺度的問(wèn)題 (longterm and short term)，你可以說(shuō)兩者都重要，但是本文只涉及其中一種2) 研究區(qū)域的問(wèn)題和時(shí)間問(wèn)題一樣，明確提出你只關(guān)心這一地區(qū)d) 最后的原場(chǎng)在前言的最后，還可以總結(jié)性地提出，這一研究對(duì)其它研究的幫助。希望不要出現(xiàn)。 8. Decision in Process到了這一步就快要有結(jié)果了，編輯開(kāi)始考慮是給修改還是直接拒， 當(dāng)然也有可能直接接受的，但可能性很小，呵呵。所以，能自如地駕馭好網(wǎng)上投稿這個(gè)新的投稿手段，對(duì)學(xué)者們而言無(wú)疑是件好事。但每份修改過(guò)的文件在網(wǎng)上都有記錄，而且每份審稿人的意見(jiàn)也都記錄在案。文件名稱(chēng)明明顯示是修改稿，可審稿人打開(kāi)文件后才發(fā)現(xiàn)是初稿又原封不動(dòng)地回來(lái)了，讓人有點(diǎn)哭笑不得。經(jīng)過(guò)作者修改過(guò)的稿件又需要在網(wǎng)上重新發(fā)回編輯部。有些刊物的編輯部就設(shè)在出版社內(nèi)，這類(lèi)期刊的檢查會(huì)更全面，包括文件形式、內(nèi)容、作者聯(lián)系方式、文章是否屬于重復(fù)性投稿等等。此外值得一提的是，部分著名出版社的網(wǎng)頁(yè)上除附有投稿需知外，還專(zhuān)門(mén)設(shè)計(jì)了針對(duì)網(wǎng)上投稿的指導(dǎo)示范文件。三是輸入文件完畢后，也就是所有的部分成功地輸入后，不要忘了點(diǎn)擊投稿發(fā)送鍵。在輸入每個(gè)部分的時(shí)候，一是要通讀該部分的有關(guān)要求，再次確認(rèn)自已輸入的文件是否符合要求。如果找不到合適的老師，作者自己要耐心地自學(xué)。有的文章還帶有附錄(APPENDIX)