【正文】 s suggestions and detail all the changes which you have made. I hope you will be prepared to undertake this, and I will then be pleased to reconsider the manuscript for publication. Please note that due to the extensive revisions necessay on your manuscript, it will need to be sent out for rereview. If you do decide to revise the paper, we need to receive your new manuscript within the next six months. You are asked to submit the following items along with the manuscript:(1) A pointbypoint reply that we can send to each reviewer。 一定要明白文章的讀者會(huì)分為多個(gè)檔次。5) 如果自己對(duì)所提出的觀點(diǎn)不完全肯定，可用 We tentatively put forward (interrprete this to..)Or The results may be due to (caused by) attributed torsulted from..Or This is probably a consequence ofIt seems that .. can account for (interpret) this..Or It is pisible that it stem from...連接詞與邏輯 寫英文論文最常見的一個(gè)毛病就是文章的邏輯不清楚。 還有個(gè)狀態(tài)是Rejected。今后，這樣的期刊可能會(huì)越來越多。這種張冠李戴的事在網(wǎng)上投稿過程中時(shí)有發(fā)生。目的是看原稿是否包含了應(yīng)該有的基本內(nèi)容。這樣造成的麻煩所耽誤的時(shí)間會(huì)更多。如果可能，最好請(qǐng)有這方面經(jīng)驗(yàn)的作者上一課，可以節(jié)省時(shí)間和事半功倍。(2) 缺少支持作者發(fā)現(xiàn)的方法學(xué)分析。 Apparently， Obviously ,Innovation ,refine ,In my humble opinion如果仍然有需要修改的小毛病，一般你可以用you paper has been conditionally accepted. Please revise .....according to review ments.如果是接受，你可以用We are very pleased to inform you that your paper xxxxx has been accepted by [journal name]. Please prepare your paper by journal template...............At a first glance, this short manuscript seems an interesting piece ofwork, reporting on . Fine, good quality, but all this has been done and published, and nearly bee a wellknown phenomenon. Therefore, there is insufficient novelty or significance to meet publication criteria. Also, I did not see any expermental evidence how the ** is related with **, except for the handwaving qualitative discussion. Therefore, I cannot support its publication in JPD in its present form. It should be rejected.建議去小木蟲問問，那里有一些資源。 only then can a proper review be performed. Most sentences contain grammatical and/or spelling mistakes or are not plete sentences.◆ As presented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal. There are problems with sentence structure, verb tense, and clause construction. ◆ The English of your manuscript must be improved before resubmission. We strongly suggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague who is wellversed in English or whose native language is English.◆ Please have someone petent in the English language and the subject matter of your paper go over the paper and correct it. ?◆ the quality of English needs improving. 來自編輯的鼓勵(lì)：Encouragement from reviewers:◆ I would be very glad to rereview the paper in greater depth once it has been edited because the subject is interesting. ◆ There is continued interest in your manuscript titled …… which you submitted to the Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: Part B Applied Biomaterials.◆ The Submission has been greatly improved and is worthy of publication.附1：中譯審稿意見審稿意見—1(1) 英文表達(dá)太差，盡管意思大致能表達(dá)清楚，但文法錯(cuò)誤太多。Reviewers have now mented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.這種形式曾經(jīng)是投稿的近乎唯一的方式，持續(xù)了漫長(zhǎng)的歲月，可現(xiàn)在采用這種方式接受來稿的刊物越來越少了。有的文章還帶有附錄(APPENDIX)，如全部的實(shí)驗(yàn)原始數(shù)據(jù)、計(jì)算機(jī)軟件程序等。在輸入每個(gè)部分的時(shí)候，一是要通讀該部分的有關(guān)要求，再次確認(rèn)自已輸入的文件是否符合要求。此外值得一提的是，部分著名出版社的網(wǎng)頁上除附有投稿需知外，還專門設(shè)計(jì)了針對(duì)網(wǎng)上投稿的指導(dǎo)示范文件。經(jīng)過作者修改過的稿件又需要在網(wǎng)上重新發(fā)回編輯部。但每份修改過的文件在網(wǎng)上都有記錄，而且每份審稿人的意見也都記錄在案。 8. Decision in Process到了這一步就快要有結(jié)果了，編輯開始考慮是給修改還是直接拒， 當(dāng)然也有可能直接接受的，但可能性很小，呵呵。We preliminarily focus on the older (younger)...或者有兩種時(shí)間尺度的問題 (longterm and short term)，你可以說兩者都重要，但是本文只涉及其中一種2) 研究區(qū)域的問題和時(shí)間問題一樣，明確提出你只關(guān)心這一地區(qū)d) 最后的原場(chǎng)在前言的最后，還可以總結(jié)性地提出，這一研究對(duì)其它研究的幫助。補(bǔ)充說明的部份可以放在最后一個(gè)片段。事實(shí)上給出文章的不足恰恰是保護(hù)自己文章的重要手段。 A f。一定要注意絕對(duì)不能全面否定前人的成果，即使在你看來前人的結(jié)論完全不對(duì)。3) 討論部份的整體結(jié)構(gòu)小標(biāo)題是比較好的方法把要討論的問題分為幾個(gè)片段。如果處理不好，reviewer會(huì)提出嚴(yán)厲的建議，比如你沒有考慮某種可能性，某種研究手段等等。 如果被邀請(qǐng)審稿人不想審，就會(huì)decline，編輯會(huì)重新邀請(qǐng)別的審稿人。在網(wǎng)上投出的稿件不論改動(dòng)多少回，其序號(hào)都不會(huì)改變，只有尾數(shù)的變動(dòng)，以表明是修改后的第幾稿。這個(gè)操作過程和最開始的投稿大同小異，往往也要將DOC文件轉(zhuǎn)換成PDF文件。如果有問題，屏幕上則會(huì)出現(xiàn)問題預(yù)警或解決問題的提示。二是按部就班地輸入文章的各個(gè)主要部分。單就普通論文而言，文章從頭到尾的基本格式是：論文的開篇部分，包括文章標(biāo)題(TITLE)，作者姓名(AUTHOR’S NAME)(注明通訊作者/CORRESPONDING AUTHOR)，作者單位地址(AFFILIATION)，論文摘要(ABSTRACT)，關(guān)鍵詞(KEYWORDS)等；論文的正文部分，包括介紹/引言(INTRODUCTION)，實(shí)驗(yàn)方法(METHOD)，實(shí)驗(yàn)材料(MATERIAL)，結(jié)果與分析(RESULTS AND ANALYSIS)，討論（DISCUSSION）, 結(jié)論（CONCLUSION）等；需說明的是不同的學(xué)科，正文的內(nèi)容和形式會(huì)有所增減，圖表、公式的數(shù)量也會(huì)有所不同。 Once the above concerns are fully addressed, the manuscript could be accepted for publication in this journal.英文論文寫作、投稿詳解(整理各大學(xué)術(shù)論壇相關(guān)帖子，轉(zhuǎn)帖) 目前科技論文作者向國(guó)際英文科技期刊投稿的方式有三種。 figures for better presentations.Ms. Ref. No.: ******Title: ****** Materials Science and Engineering Dear Dr. ******,the39?！?In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study. ◆ Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided. 對(duì)于研究設(shè)計(jì)的rationale: Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design. 夸張地陳述結(jié)論/夸大成果/不嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)： The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.對(duì)hypothesis的清晰界定： A hypothesis needs to be presented。s copy editors should not have to fix the many remaining errors. I sympathize that Chinese languages do not have an equivalent of English articles 39。附2：英文審稿意見(略有刪節(jié))Reviewer: 1There are many things wrong with this paper.The English is very bad. Although the meaning is by and large clear, not too many sentences are correct.The literature review is poor. The paper is riddled with assertions and claims that should be supported by references.The paper reads as an advertisement for XXX. It is not clear that the author is independent of XXX.The AA model of XXX is not as innovative as the author claims. There are now many XX that follow this model (American Geophysical Union, for example), and the author