【正文】 ments:Reviewer 1: Comments on JSVD0601203Title: Fault diagnosis research based on timefrequency method in rotor systemsBy: , and _______________________________________The paper presents an application of reassigned wavelet scalogram for rotor system fault diagnosis. It is a topic of interest to the researchers in the related areas but the paper needs very significant improvement before acceptance for publication. My detailed ments are as follows: 1. The wavelet method (reassigned wavelet scalogram) used in the paper works very well for the underlying fault diagnosis problem. On the other hand, this wavelet method is a wellestablished method, and the present research is a direct application of this method without new contribution in methodological research. 2. For the above reason, the presentation should be focused on the results. Unfortunately, the presentation is far from acceptable for publication. The material was not properly organized and it is strongly suggested that the authors check carefully the English writing and use standard terminologies in the technical area.3. The title of the paper should be more specific since numerous studies have been done on the fault diagnosis of rotor systems using wavelets and timefrequency methods. Also, remove the word research.4. On Section 1: Notwithstading its limitation, this tudy does suggest.. However, these problems culd be solved if we consdierDespite its preliminary character, this study can clearly indicate..用中文來說，這一部份是左右逢源。為了使文章清楚，第一次提出概念時，最好加以個括弧，給出較為詳細的解釋。這種情況下，一定要注意邏輯結構。 以上是常見的語言結構，不算抄襲。如果研究的方法以及方向和前人一樣，可以通過下面的方式強調自己工作的作用：However, data is still scarcerareless accuratethere is still dearth ofWe need toaim tohave toprovide more documentsdatarecordsstudiesincrease the datasetFurther studies are still necessary...essential... 為了強調自己研究的重要性，一般還要在However之前介紹自己研究問題的反方面，另一方面等等比如：1)時間問題如果你研究的問題時間上比較新，你就可以大量提及對時間較老的問題的研究及重要性，然后說(However)，對時間尺度比較新的問題研究不足2)物性及研究手段問題如果你要應用一種新手段或者研究方向，你可以提出當前比較流行的方法以及物質性質，然后說對你所研究的方向和方法，研究甚少。 10. Revision Submitted to Journal 又開始了一個循環(huán)。這當中就會有另兩個狀態(tài)： 3. Editor assigned 4. Editor Declined Invitation 如果編輯接手處理了就會邀請審稿人了。對被否定的文章，如果作者對否定的原因有異議，可以向編輯部或主編提出自己的意見，據(jù)理力爭。如果作者愿意根據(jù)審稿人的意見改動論文，則需改得全面徹底，并且對審稿人提出的疑問要一一做答。與此同時，作者的電子信箱內同樣會收到一封編輯部的來信，明確告之稿件應該進行修改或補充的地方。在這個轉換過程中，計算機屏幕會呈停滯狀態(tài)，看上去好像死機了。有的文章作者完全忽略了刊物對關鍵詞的要求，隨心所欲。作者要根據(jù)自身的情況，選擇文章應該包含的內容，一旦確定，所有的內容都要在網(wǎng)上投稿前準備好。首先，作者對所要投稿的國際英文刊物的投稿需知(GUIDE FOR AUTHORS)要了解清楚，并且按照要求準備好原稿的所有文件。目前采用這種納稿方式的期刊還很多，但有很大一部分期刊己經(jīng)在此基礎上，又進了一步，發(fā)展到第三種也是目前最新的一種投稿方式，即網(wǎng)上投稿 (ONLINE SUBMISSION)。2)39。 Katsanakas, Mgt. Sci., 2006。(4) 該模式的創(chuàng)新性并非如作者所述，目前有許多XX采取此模式（如美國地球物理學會），作者應詳加調查并分析XXX運作模式的創(chuàng)新點。 and don39。 The experiment is the major problem in the paper. Not only the dataset is not published, but also the description is very rough. It is impossible to replicate the experiment and verify the claim of the author. Furthermore, almost no discussion for the experimental result is given. . why the author would obtain this result? Which ponent is the most important? Any further improvement? .. .. .. ..目標和結果不清晰。 the author should concentrated on the new algorithm with your idea and explained its advantages clearly with a most simple words. t seem to grasp the material meaning of those words. The author39。(5) 該模式也不是作者所說的那樣成功……(審稿人結合論文中的數(shù)據(jù)具體分析)審稿意見—2(1) 缺少直接相關的文獻引用(如…)。 McCabe amp。 ments are appended below.  Reviewer 1: This work proposes an extensive review on micromulsionbased methods for the synthesis of Ag nanoparticles. As such, the matter is of interest, however the paper suffers for two serious limits:這種方式速度快，而且稿件不會丟失。一般科技論文分為回顧性文章(REVIEW ARTICLE)，普通論文(REGULAR/RESEARCH ARTICLE)，快訊(SHORT COMMUNICATIONS)等。此外，不但原稿的內容和格式要符合刊物的要術，而且在字數(shù)、頁數(shù)、格式、文件儲存形式等方面，均要與投稿刊物的要求一致。 在網(wǎng)上投稿，頭一步是在網(wǎng)頁上注冊，也叫作者登記。二是確認每個部分輸入的完整性。其實不然，只需耐心等待罷了。作者只需上網(wǎng)從自己的文件夾中調出文件修改即可。這份單獨的問答要整理成一份單獨的文件，在網(wǎng)上再次發(fā)稿時使用。如果主編同意作者的意見，文章可以重新進入新的一輪審稿程序。 5. Reviewer(s) invited 如果審稿人接受那就會是以下狀態(tài)： 6. Under review 這應該是一個漫長的等待。 11. Accepted如果不要再審，只是小修改，編輯看后會馬上顯示這個狀態(tài)，但如果要再審也會有上面的部分狀態(tài)。3)研究區(qū)域問題首先總結相鄰區(qū)域或者其它區(qū)域的研究，然后強調這一區(qū)域研究不足4)不確定性雖然前人對這一問題研究很多，但是目前有兩種或者更多種的觀點，這種uncertanties, ambiguities，值得進一步澄清5)提出自己的假設來驗證如果自己的研究完全是新的，沒有前人的工作進行對比，在這種情況下，你可以自信地說，根據(jù)提出的過程，存在這種可能的結果，本文就是要證實這種結果。怎樣提出觀點 在提出自己的觀點時，采取什么樣的策略很重要。首先第一段要明確告訴讀者你要討論幾個部份 ...Therefore, there are three aspects of this problen have tobe addressed.The first questuon involves...The second problem relates toThe thrid aspect deals with...上面的例子可以清晰地把觀點逐層敘述。如果文章用了很多的Abbreviation, 兩種方法加以解決1) 在文章最好加上個Appendix，把所有Abreviation列表2) 在不同的頁面上，不時地給出Abbreciation的含義，用來提醒讀者。把審稿人想到的問題提前給一個交代，同時表明你已經(jīng)在思考這些問題，但是由于文章長度，試驗進度或者試驗手段的制約，暫時不能回答這些問題。 This section listed many references that are mainly related to rotor dynamics and are not directly related to rotor system diagnosis. If the authors would like to keep these references, some discussions on the relevance of these refs to the present research are needed. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them.To submit a revision, please go to Your username is: ********Your password is: **************On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled Submissions Needing Revision. You will find your submission record there.Yours sincerely,Richard BerrymanEditorial Office (Australasia)Journal of Sound and VibrationReviewers39。所謂不足，包括以下內容:1. 研究的問題有點片面討論時一定要說，It should be noted that this study has examined only..We concentrate (focus) on only...We have to point out that we do not..Some limitations of this study are...2. 結論有些不足The results do not imply,The results can not be used to determinebe taken as evidence of Unfortunately, we can not determien this from this dataOur results are lack of ...但是，在指出這些不足之后，隨后一定要再一次加強本文的重要性以及可能采取的手段來解決這些不足，為別人或者自己的下一步研究打下浮筆。這