【正文】 ments:Reviewer 1: Comments on JSVD0601203Title: Fault diagnosis research based on timefrequency method in rotor systemsBy: , and _______________________________________The paper presents an application of reassigned wavelet scalogram for rotor system fault diagnosis. It is a topic of interest to the researchers in the related areas but the paper needs very significant improvement before acceptance for publication. My detailed ments are as follows: 1. The wavelet method (reassigned wavelet scalogram) used in the paper works very well for the underlying fault diagnosis problem. On the other hand, this wavelet method is a wellestablished method, and the present research is a direct application of this method without new contribution in methodological research. 2. For the above reason, the presentation should be focused on the results. Unfortunately, the presentation is far from acceptable for publication. The material was not properly organized and it is strongly suggested that the authors check carefully the English writing and use standard terminologies in the technical area.3. The title of the paper should be more specific since numerous studies have been done on the fault diagnosis of rotor systems using wavelets and timefrequency methods. Also, remove the word research.4. On Section 1: Notwithstading its limitation, this tudy does suggest.. However, these problems culd be solved if we consdierDespite its preliminary character, this study can clearly indicate..用中文來(lái)說(shuō)，這一部份是左右逢源。為了使文章清楚，第一次提出概念時(shí)，最好加以個(gè)括弧，給出較為詳細(xì)的解釋。這種情況下，一定要注意邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)。 以上是常見(jiàn)的語(yǔ)言結(jié)構(gòu)，不算抄襲。如果研究的方法以及方向和前人一樣，可以通過(guò)下面的方式強(qiáng)調(diào)自己工作的作用：However, data is still scarcerareless accuratethere is still dearth ofWe need toaim tohave toprovide more documentsdatarecordsstudiesincrease the datasetFurther studies are still necessary...essential... 為了強(qiáng)調(diào)自己研究的重要性，一般還要在However之前介紹自己研究問(wèn)題的反方面，另一方面等等比如：1)時(shí)間問(wèn)題如果你研究的問(wèn)題時(shí)間上比較新，你就可以大量提及對(duì)時(shí)間較老的問(wèn)題的研究及重要性，然后說(shuō)(However)，對(duì)時(shí)間尺度比較新的問(wèn)題研究不足2)物性及研究手段問(wèn)題如果你要應(yīng)用一種新手段或者研究方向，你可以提出當(dāng)前比較流行的方法以及物質(zhì)性質(zhì)，然后說(shuō)對(duì)你所研究的方向和方法，研究甚少。 10. Revision Submitted to Journal 又開(kāi)始了一個(gè)循環(huán)。這當(dāng)中就會(huì)有另兩個(gè)狀態(tài)： 3. Editor assigned 4. Editor Declined Invitation 如果編輯接手處理了就會(huì)邀請(qǐng)審稿人了。對(duì)被否定的文章，如果作者對(duì)否定的原因有異議，可以向編輯部或主編提出自己的意見(jiàn)，據(jù)理力爭(zhēng)。如果作者愿意根據(jù)審稿人的意見(jiàn)改動(dòng)論文，則需改得全面徹底，并且對(duì)審稿人提出的疑問(wèn)要一一做答。與此同時(shí)，作者的電子信箱內(nèi)同樣會(huì)收到一封編輯部的來(lái)信，明確告之稿件應(yīng)該進(jìn)行修改或補(bǔ)充的地方。在這個(gè)轉(zhuǎn)換過(guò)程中，計(jì)算機(jī)屏幕會(huì)呈停滯狀態(tài)，看上去好像死機(jī)了。有的文章作者完全忽略了刊物對(duì)關(guān)鍵詞的要求，隨心所欲。作者要根據(jù)自身的情況，選擇文章應(yīng)該包含的內(nèi)容，一旦確定，所有的內(nèi)容都要在網(wǎng)上投稿前準(zhǔn)備好。首先，作者對(duì)所要投稿的國(guó)際英文刊物的投稿需知(GUIDE FOR AUTHORS)要了解清楚，并且按照要求準(zhǔn)備好原稿的所有文件。目前采用這種納稿方式的期刊還很多，但有很大一部分期刊己經(jīng)在此基礎(chǔ)上，又進(jìn)了一步，發(fā)展到第三種也是目前最新的一種投稿方式，即網(wǎng)上投稿 (ONLINE SUBMISSION)。2)39。 Katsanakas, Mgt. Sci., 2006。(4) 該模式的創(chuàng)新性并非如作者所述，目前有許多XX采取此模式（如美國(guó)地球物理學(xué)會(huì)），作者應(yīng)詳加調(diào)查并分析XXX運(yùn)作模式的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)。 and don39。 The experiment is the major problem in the paper. Not only the dataset is not published, but also the description is very rough. It is impossible to replicate the experiment and verify the claim of the author. Furthermore, almost no discussion for the experimental result is given. . why the author would obtain this result? Which ponent is the most important? Any further improvement? .. .. .. ..目標(biāo)和結(jié)果不清晰。 the author should concentrated on the new algorithm with your idea and explained its advantages clearly with a most simple words. t seem to grasp the material meaning of those words. The author39。(5) 該模式也不是作者所說(shuō)的那樣成功……(審稿人結(jié)合論文中的數(shù)據(jù)具體分析)審稿意見(jiàn)—2(1) 缺少直接相關(guān)的文獻(xiàn)引用(如…)。 McCabe amp。 ments are appended below.  Reviewer 1: This work proposes an extensive review on micromulsionbased methods for the synthesis of Ag nanoparticles. As such, the matter is of interest, however the paper suffers for two serious limits:這種方式速度快，而且稿件不會(huì)丟失。一般科技論文分為回顧性文章(REVIEW ARTICLE)，普通論文(REGULAR/RESEARCH ARTICLE)，快訊(SHORT COMMUNICATIONS)等。此外，不但原稿的內(nèi)容和格式要符合刊物的要術(shù)，而且在字?jǐn)?shù)、頁(yè)數(shù)、格式、文件儲(chǔ)存形式等方面，均要與投稿刊物的要求一致。 在網(wǎng)上投稿，頭一步是在網(wǎng)頁(yè)上注冊(cè)，也叫作者登記。二是確認(rèn)每個(gè)部分輸入的完整性。其實(shí)不然，只需耐心等待罷了。作者只需上網(wǎng)從自己的文件夾中調(diào)出文件修改即可。這份單獨(dú)的問(wèn)答要整理成一份單獨(dú)的文件，在網(wǎng)上再次發(fā)稿時(shí)使用。如果主編同意作者的意見(jiàn)，文章可以重新進(jìn)入新的一輪審稿程序。 5. Reviewer(s) invited 如果審稿人接受那就會(huì)是以下?tīng)顟B(tài)： 6. Under review 這應(yīng)該是一個(gè)漫長(zhǎng)的等待。 11. Accepted如果不要再審，只是小修改，編輯看后會(huì)馬上顯示這個(gè)狀態(tài)，但如果要再審也會(huì)有上面的部分狀態(tài)。3)研究區(qū)域問(wèn)題首先總結(jié)相鄰區(qū)域或者其它區(qū)域的研究，然后強(qiáng)調(diào)這一區(qū)域研究不足4)不確定性雖然前人對(duì)這一問(wèn)題研究很多，但是目前有兩種或者更多種的觀點(diǎn)，這種uncertanties, ambiguities，值得進(jìn)一步澄清5)提出自己的假設(shè)來(lái)驗(yàn)證如果自己的研究完全是新的，沒(méi)有前人的工作進(jìn)行對(duì)比，在這種情況下，你可以自信地說(shuō)，根據(jù)提出的過(guò)程，存在這種可能的結(jié)果，本文就是要證實(shí)這種結(jié)果。怎樣提出觀點(diǎn) 在提出自己的觀點(diǎn)時(shí)，采取什么樣的策略很重要。首先第一段要明確告訴讀者你要討論幾個(gè)部份 ...Therefore, there are three aspects of this problen have tobe addressed.The first questuon involves...The second problem relates toThe thrid aspect deals with...上面的例子可以清晰地把觀點(diǎn)逐層敘述。如果文章用了很多的Abbreviation, 兩種方法加以解決1) 在文章最好加上個(gè)Appendix，把所有Abreviation列表2) 在不同的頁(yè)面上，不時(shí)地給出Abbreciation的含義，用來(lái)提醒讀者。把審稿人想到的問(wèn)題提前給一個(gè)交代，同時(shí)表明你已經(jīng)在思考這些問(wèn)題，但是由于文章長(zhǎng)度，試驗(yàn)進(jìn)度或者試驗(yàn)手段的制約，暫時(shí)不能回答這些問(wèn)題。 This section listed many references that are mainly related to rotor dynamics and are not directly related to rotor system diagnosis. If the authors would like to keep these references, some discussions on the relevance of these refs to the present research are needed. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them.To submit a revision, please go to Your username is: ********Your password is: **************On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled Submissions Needing Revision. You will find your submission record there.Yours sincerely,Richard BerrymanEditorial Office (Australasia)Journal of Sound and VibrationReviewers39。所謂不足，包括以下內(nèi)容:1. 研究的問(wèn)題有點(diǎn)片面討論時(shí)一定要說(shuō)，It should be noted that this study has examined only..We concentrate (focus) on only...We have to point out that we do not..Some limitations of this study are...2. 結(jié)論有些不足The results do not imply,The results can not be used to determinebe taken as evidence of Unfortunately, we can not determien this from this dataOur results are lack of ...但是，在指出這些不足之后，隨后一定要再一次加強(qiáng)本文的重要性以及可能采取的手段來(lái)解決這些不足，為別人或者自己的下一步研究打下浮筆。這