【正文】 .. .. .. ..目標和結(jié)果不清晰。 It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.未解釋研究方法或解釋不充分?！?In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study. ◆ Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided. 對于研究設(shè)計的rationale: Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design. 夸張地陳述結(jié)論/夸大成果/不嚴謹： The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.對hypothesis的清晰界定： A hypothesis needs to be presented。對某個概念或工具使用的rationale/定義概念： What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume ratio?對研究問題的定義： Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear, write one section to define the problem如何凸現(xiàn)原創(chuàng)性以及如何充分地寫literature review: The topic is novel but the application proposed is not so novel.對claim,如A＞B的證明，verification: There is no experimental parison of the algorithm with previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an improvement on previous work.嚴謹度問題： MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove that. 1格式（重視程度）：◆ In addition, the list of references is not in our style. It is close but not pletely correct. I have attached a pdf file with Instructions for Authors which shows examples. ◆ Before submitting a revision be sure that your material is properly prepared and formatted. If you are unsure, please consult the formatting nstructions to authors that are given under the Instructions and Forms button in he upper righthand corner of the screen.1語言問題（出現(xiàn)最多的問題）：有關(guān)語言的審稿人意見：◆ It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader. ◆ The authors must have their work reviewed by a proper translation/reviewing service before submission。 only then can a proper review be performed. Most sentences contain grammatical and/or spelling mistakes or are not plete sentences.◆ As presented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal. There are problems with sentence structure, verb tense, and clause construction. ◆ The English of your manuscript must be improved before resubmission. We strongly suggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague who is wellversed in English or whose native language is English.◆ Please have someone petent in the English language and the subject matter of your paper go over the paper and correct it. ?◆ the quality of English needs improving. 來自編輯的鼓勵：Encouragement from reviewers:◆ I would be very glad to rereview the paper in greater depth once it has been edited because the subject is interesting. ◆ There is continued interest in your manuscript titled …… which you submitted to the Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: Part B Applied Biomaterials.◆ The Submission has been greatly improved and is worthy of publication. The paper is very annoying to read as it is riddled with grammatical errors and poorly constructed sentences. Furthermore, the novelty and motivation of the work is not well justified. Also, the experimental study is shallow. In fact, I cant figure out the legends as it is too small! How does your effort pares with stateoftheart? The experiment is the major problem in the paper. Not only the dataset is not published, but also the description is very rough. It is impossible to replicate the experiment and verify the claim of the author. Furthermore, almost no discussion for the experimental result is given. . why the author would obtain this result? Which ponent is the most important? Any further improvement? the author should concentrated on the new algorithm with your idea and explained its advantages clearly with a most simple words. it is good concept, but need to polish layout, language. The authors did a good job in motivating the problem studied in the introduction. The mathematic explanation of the proposed solutions is also nice. Furthermore, the paper is acpanied by an adequate set of experiments for evaluating the effectiveness of the solutions the authors propose. Apparently， Obviously ,Innovation ,refine ,In my humble opinion如果仍然有需要修改的小毛病，一般你可以用you paper has been conditionally accepted. Please revise .....according to review ments.如果是接受，你可以用We are very pleased to inform you that your paper xxxxx has been accepted by [journal name]. Please prepare your paper by journal template...............At a first glance, this short manuscript seems an interesting piece ofwork, reporting on . Fine, good quality, but all this has been done and published, and nearly bee a wellknown phenomenon. Therefore, there is insufficient novelty or significance to meet publication criteria. Also, I did not see any expermental evidence how the ** is related with **, except for the handwaving qualitative discussion. Therefore, I cannot support its publication in JPD in its present form. It should be rejected.建議去小木蟲問問，那里有一些資源。the journal39。s copy editors should not have to fix the many remaining errors. I sympathize that Chinese languages do not have an equivalent of English articles 39。a, an, the39。 and don39。t seem to grasp the material meaning of those words. The author39。s English expert decided to insert the word 39。the39。 in front of most mentions of tiptilt system. This implies that there is only one system and the authors are us