【正文】 14: 3340.Campbell, M. K., I. Tessaro, B. Devellis, S. Benedict, K. Kelsey, L. Belton amp。 A. Sanhueza, 2002, Effects of a Tailored Health Promotion Program for Female BlueCollar Workers: Health Works for Women, Preventive Medicine, 34(3): 31323.Chenoweth, H. D., 1991, Planning Health Promotion at the Worksite. Dubuque, IA: Brown amp。 Benchmark Publishers.Chu, C., G. Breucker, N. Harris, A. Stitzel, X. Gan, X. Gu amp。 S. Dwyer, 2000, HealthPromoting Workplaces—International Settings Development, Health Promotion International, 15(2): 155167.Dessler, G., 1997, Human Resource Management, 7th edition, NY: PrenticeHall International Inc.EFILWC, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, 2000, Workplace Health Promotion in Europe, Luxembourg: European Communities.Fielding, J. E. amp。 P. V. Piserchia, 1989, Frequency of Worksite Health Promotion Activities, American Journal of Public Health, 79: 1620.Glasgow, R. E., . McCaul amp。 K. J. Fisher, 1993, Participation in Worksite Health Promotion: A Critique of the Literature and Remendations for Future Practice , Health Education Quarterly, 20(3): 391408.Gough, I., 1979, The Political Economy of Welfare States. London: Macmillan.Haynes, G., T. Dunnagan amp。 V. Smith, 1999, Do Employees Participating in Voluntary Health Promotion Programs Incur Lower Health Care Costs？ Health Promotion International, 14(1): 4352.Janer, G.. S. amp。 M. Kogevinas, 2002, Health Promotion Trials at Worksites and Risk Factors for Cancer, Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 28(3): 141157.Johansson, M. amp。 T. Partanen, 2002, Role of Trade Unions in Workplace Health Promotion, International Journal of Health Services, 32(1): 179193.Kurtz, J. R., T. G. Robins, amp。 M. A. Schork, 1997, An Evaluation of Peer and Professional Trainers in a Unionbased Occupational Health and Safety Training Program, Journal of Occupational Environment Medicine, 39: 661671.Lovato, C. Y. amp。 L. W. Green, 1990, Maintaining Employee Participation in Workplace Health Promotion Programs, Health Education Quarterly, 17(1): 7388.March, . amp。 J. P. Olsen, 1984, New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life, American Political Science Review, 78: 345365.Muto, T. amp。 K. Yamauchi, 2001, Evaluation of a Multiponent Workplace Health Promotion Program Conducted in Japan for Improving Employees39。 Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors, Preventive Medicine, 33(6): 571577.Sloan, R. P., J. C. Gruman, amp。 J. P. Allegrante, 1987, Changing the Organization’s HealthRelated Policies, Investing in Employee Health, , San Francisco, San Francisco and London: JosseyBass Publishers.Schultz, ., C. Lu, . Barnett, . Yen, T. McDonald, D. Hirschland amp。 . Edington, 2002, Influence of Participation in a Worksite Health –Promotion Program on Disability Days, Journal of Occupational Environment Medicine, 44(8): 77680.Signal, L., 1998, The Politics of Health Promotion, Health Promotion International, 13(3): 257263. United States Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service, 1993, National Survey of Worksite Health Promotion Activities: Summary, American Journal of Health Promotion, 7(6): 452465.Vainio, H. amp。 L. Stayner, 2002, Can Health Promotion at the Workplace Help Prevent Cancer, Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 28(3): 137139.Wilson, ., . DeJoy, . Jorgensen amp。 C. J. Crump, 1999, Health Promotion Programs in Small Worksites: Results of a National Survey, American Journal of Health Promotion, 13(6): 358365.Wynne, R., 1997, The Challenge of Workplace Health Promotion: New Roles are Needed, Work amp。 Stress, 11(4): 301303.Survey Research on the Current Status of Health Promotionin the WorkplaceFenling ChenAssistant Professor, Department of Sociology, YuanZe University ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study is trying to explore the attitudes of managerial level in the enterprises and trade unions towards health promotion in the workplace, including their willingness for implementing health promotion projects, their main considerations, the problems they meet, the possible incentives for them, and the current projects they offered to the employees. This study especially focuses on the parison of the differences between large panies and medium amp。 small panies. This study applied survey research method, and used mail questionnaire to collect data. In our total 960 samples, 500 samples are randomly selected from “Top 500 Enterprises List” and “Memberships of Medium and Small Companies Association”, and the other 460 samples are randomly selected from the list of industry trade unions. We receive 305 questionnaires, and the response rate is %.Our results show that: (1) Comparing with medium amp。 small panies, large panies have offered more projects to implement health promotion. (2) The main incentives, advantages, disadvantages, and problems of implementing health promotion in the workplace are similar for large panies and medium amp。 small panies. (3) Large panies are willing to put more money than medium amp。 small panies to implement health promotion. (4) For large panies, the regression results indicate that the explanatory variables for the total number of health promotion projects include whether the trade union has involved in the implementation of health promotion projects and the total number of fulltime employees. For medium amp。 small panies, the only significant explanatory variable is their earnings before taxes.Keywords: Size of enterprise, Health promotion in the workplace, Managerial level, Attitude17 / 17