住房政策的外文翻譯--住房政策是福利和經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的鏈接-資料下載頁
2025-05-12 16:24本頁面
【導(dǎo)讀】近十幾年來，住房增多現(xiàn)象在歐洲許多城市已成為最明顯的變化。的居民區(qū)在城市景觀中占主要地位。這場變革導(dǎo)致了房屋數(shù)量正以出人意料的速度增長。觀地反映了人們對房屋的迫切需求。目前，許多國家，尤其是西歐的部分國家，人。這主要取決于各個國家的文化，政策傳統(tǒng)以及各國經(jīng)濟的多樣發(fā)展。屋已成為重要政策中的主要成分。西歐目前60%的房屋建于1945年以后，對于這些。房屋的存在形式來說，大多數(shù)住房屬于補貼性住房。些承受不起上漲房價的人能買到房子。們，而其他地方，該項補助還涉及到低收入家庭。度，這現(xiàn)象在一些國家比較低，較為顯著的主要有荷蘭，瑞士和德國。最終，連瑞典和荷蘭這兩個對福利。于是在歐洲貨幣整合情況下，各州不得不采取積。極的應(yīng)對措施，此次事件給各國國家債務(wù)帶來了太多的政治壓力。應(yīng)在世界經(jīng)濟中,發(fā)生了根本性的變化的現(xiàn)象。區(qū)、濃度的弱勢民族、無家可歸的人在街道上行走等等。
【正文】 le tend to concentrate in the best residential areas. Good housing attracts highine decisionmakers and professionals. And it is precisely these groups that now oil the wheels of the local economy. When they move to particular places, attracted by the homes and highamenity residential environments, businesses follow close behind. As human capital is a major resource for modern business, this turns the residential environment into a relevant economic location factor. Specifically, it gives more weight to the residential preferences of those whose opinion matters when firms move. As skilled workers and professionals seek to minimize their muting time, firms located nearby have an advantage in attracting and retaining a qualified workforce. Where housing petes with other policy fields for limited resources, housing officials are often called upon to demonstrate the benefits of investment in housing. At present, local authorities seem to be preoccupied with the task of revitalizing and restructuring the local economy. They have less interest in the provision of public goods and investments that serve consumption。 instead, they feel that ensuring municipal revenues has to take precedence over spending. Yet, by extension of the argument presented above– that the promotion of equity stimulates the local economy – it seems that money spent on housing investment, even social housing, would generate economic benefits. The old urban regions that have adapted themselves successfully to new economic realities seem to consist of two worlds. They are the workplaces and the playgrounds of the newly affluent, with their lifestyles of conspicuous consumption. At the same time, these places are characterized by decaying neighborhoods, concentrations of disadvantaged ethnic groups, and homeless people on the streets. In terms of the ideology of the welfare state that spawned the large social housing programs of the past, such contrasts cry out for sharing the benefits of the economic transformation. But the ideal of the redistributive welfare state has lost out to the liberal notion of ‘betting on the strong’. Yet, there is no particular need to reinstate the social housing programs of the past. Other, less ambitious solutions can diminish social inequality in an area. But these must be designed to fuel the flow of investment. Good housing in attractive neighborhoods can prompt investment by the private sector. Poor housing conditions, in contrast, are a strong indicator of social exclusion and of conflict. They must be avoided, as they transmit one clear message: these are not the places where new investment will be secure. When figuring out a formula for a city’s success, housing should not be the missing link between welfare and economic development.
畢業(yè)設(shè)計相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1