供應(yīng)商管理規(guī)劃概論(編輯修改稿)
2025-02-06 04:13 本頁面
【文章內(nèi)容簡介】 Quarter:_____ Score: _ ___1 Quality Index = (accept lot X 1 + Deviation lot X + Reject lot X 0) / Total lot X 100%Supplier fault exception spec ’ s revised by Mitac requirement. Points are scored depending on the scope of the purge and theimplication of the product holds. Each occurrence is scored.upload by .* .... . ?評分 考核評分與 TQRDCS A. and SPECprovided15days prior approval0 and information providedwithin 1 week10 and information providedwithin 12 weeks5 and information providedwithin 24 weeks3 and information providedover 4 weeks0Factory Audit VMD AUDIT 60 VMD engineer visit supplier factory on schedule for the audition on thefabrication process quality management of the plant. The key pointsof the audition are based upon :1. Process control audit form.2. The process of vendor OQA(must meet MSL AQL) issued a clear road map withschedule and met the schedule10 issued a clear road map withschedule,but didn39。t meet the schedule4 issue any 0 issued a clear instruction andfollow the instruction exactly withrecord on site30 issued a clear instruction,butthe instruction was not followedexactly on site15 issued a clear instruction,butthe instruction was not followed at allon site5 any instruction issued or actiontaken0Supplier shall have keeping continuous development the Technology to improve the reliability, quality, functionally, Production efficiency/yield and new technology for the Product and process. And e out a clear Road Map toSuppliers should enforce the following items : 1. The improvement action in each 8D report.2. Action plan deciTechnologydevelopment/ roadmapEngineering Change Requests apply to both products and Process. ECRs areused to municate change made to the Form, fit and /or function of theproduct or process used in Producing a product. Mitac requires formal writtennotification and samples fImprovementenforcementCategory 2 sub total(20%)2 TechnologyCategory 1 sub total(30%)Extradeduction: Engineering REV. changecontrol(ECR)1 Qualityupload by .* .... . ?評分 考核評分與 TQRDCS 7/7 requirements 65 6/7 requirements 40 5/7 requirements 15 4/7 requirements 0 within 3 days 0 within 35days 15 within 57days 40 beyond 7 days 65 unfavorable responses 35 unfavorable responses 30 than 1 unfavorable responses 10 than 5 unfavorable responses 0 leadership 50 top three 25 of top three 090%~~100% 5080%~~89% 2575%~~79% 10less than 75% 0This assessment is based on the cost information of the market to makesure Mitac can get a good quality material with a good priceThis assessment is based on the ability of the supplier to respond toMitac request to meet program target costs ,Both monthly andquarterly in marketFA/CA1. Problem identification and action plan within 24 hours.2. Containment plan within 48 hours.3. Corrective action plan within 72 hours.4. Problem closure within 1 week.5. All actions executed to planned dates.6. All actions documented via 8D format. cost downtargetWhile Mitac doesn39。t receive qualified 8D expected from suppliers withinspecified period, score deduction is as leftwords.1. Satisfactory answers to your questions?2. The response to your inquiries
數(shù)學(xué)相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1