【正文】 □ 中 □ 及格 □ 不及格論文（設(shè)計(jì)說明書）所體現(xiàn)的整體水平□ 優(yōu) □ 良 □ 中 □ 及格 □ 不及格建議成績：□ 優(yōu) □ 良 □ 中 □ 及格 □ 不及格（在所選等級(jí)前的□內(nèi)畫“√”）評閱教師： （簽名） 單位： （蓋章）年 月 日教研室（或答辯小組）及教學(xué)系意見教研室（或答辯小組）評價(jià)：一、答辯過程畢業(yè)論文（設(shè)計(jì)）的基本要點(diǎn)和見解的敘述情況□ 優(yōu) □ 良 □ 中 □ 及格 □ 不及格對答辯問題的反應(yīng)、理解、表達(dá)情況□ 優(yōu) □ 良 □ 中 □ 及格 □ 不及格學(xué)生答辯過程中的精神狀態(tài)□ 優(yōu) □ 良 □ 中 □ 及格 □ 不及格二、論文（設(shè)計(jì)）質(zhì)量論文（設(shè)計(jì)）的整體結(jié)構(gòu)是否符合撰寫規(guī)范？□ 優(yōu) □ 良 □ 中 □ 及格 □ 不及格是否完成指定的論文（設(shè)計(jì)）任務(wù)（包括裝訂及附件）？□ 優(yōu) □ 良 □ 中 □ 及格 □ 不及格三、論文（設(shè)計(jì)）水平論文（設(shè)計(jì)）的理論意義或?qū)鉀Q實(shí)際問題的指導(dǎo)意義□ 優(yōu) □ 良 □ 中 □ 及格 □ 不及格論文的觀念是否有新意？設(shè)計(jì)是否有創(chuàng)意？□ 優(yōu) □ 良 □ 中 □ 及格 □ 不及格論文（設(shè)計(jì)說明書）所體現(xiàn)的整體水平□ 優(yōu) □ 良 □ 中 □ 及格 □ 不及格評定成績：□ 優(yōu) □ 良 □ 中 □ 及格 □ 不及格（在所選等級(jí)前的□內(nèi)畫“√”）教研室主任（或答辯小組組長）： （簽名）年 月 日教學(xué)系意見：系主任： （簽名）年 月 日論文獨(dú)創(chuàng)性聲明本論文是我個(gè)人在導(dǎo)師指導(dǎo)下進(jìn)行的研究工作及取得的研究成果。本人完全意識(shí)到本聲明的法律后果由本人承擔(dān)。作 者 簽 名：　　 　 　　日　 期：　　 　 　　 指導(dǎo)教師簽名：　　 　 　　 日　　期：　　 　 　　 使用授權(quán)說明本人完全了解 大學(xué)關(guān)于收集、保存、使用畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)（論文）的規(guī)定，即：按照學(xué)校要求提交畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)（論文）的印刷本和電子版本；學(xué)校有權(quán)保存畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)（論文）的印刷本和電子版，并提供目錄檢索與閱覽服務(wù)；學(xué)?？梢圆捎糜坝　⒖s印、數(shù)字化或其它復(fù)制手段保存論文；在不以贏利為目的前提下，學(xué)?？梢怨颊撐牡牟糠只蛉績?nèi)容。學(xué)校代碼：10254密 級(jí)：論文編號(hào)：上海海事大學(xué)SHANGHAI MARITIME UNIVERSITY 碩士學(xué)位論文 MASTER DISSERTATION 論文題目： 提單運(yùn)輸中貨物控制權(quán)研究 學(xué)科專業(yè)： 國際法學(xué) 畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)（論文）原創(chuàng)性聲明和使用授權(quán)說明原創(chuàng)性聲明本人鄭重承諾：所呈交的畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)（論文），是我個(gè)人在指導(dǎo)教師的指導(dǎo)下進(jìn)行的研究工作及取得的成果。作者簽名：　　 　 　　 日　 期：　　 　 　　 學(xué)位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明本人鄭重聲明：所呈交的論文是本人在導(dǎo)師的指導(dǎo)下獨(dú)立進(jìn)行研究所取得的研究成果。作者簽名： 日期： 年 月 日學(xué)位論文版權(quán)使用授權(quán)書本學(xué)位論文作者完全了解學(xué)校有關(guān)保留、使用學(xué)位論文的規(guī)定，同意學(xué)校保留并向國家有關(guān)部門或機(jī)構(gòu)送交論文的復(fù)印件和電子版，允許論文被查閱和借閱。論文中除了特別加以標(biāo)注和致謝的地方外，不包含其他人或者其他機(jī)構(gòu)已經(jīng)發(fā)表或撰寫過的研究成果。作者簽名： 導(dǎo)師簽名： 日期： 提單運(yùn)輸中貨物控制權(quán)研究 摘 要摘 要在國際貨物運(yùn)輸領(lǐng)域，除海運(yùn)外其他運(yùn)輸方式的國際公約對貨物控制權(quán)已有所規(guī)定。貨物控制權(quán)作為一項(xiàng)全新的法律制度，其規(guī)定于《鹿特丹規(guī)則》第十章。第二章詳細(xì)論述了貨物控制權(quán)的內(nèi)容和主體。權(quán)利主體為控制方，義務(wù)主體為承運(yùn)人。貨物控制權(quán)的法律性質(zhì)為特殊的法定債權(quán)請求權(quán)，同時(shí)具有一定的物權(quán)性。關(guān)鍵詞：貨物控制權(quán)，提單制度，影響與借鑒50提單運(yùn)輸中貨物控制權(quán)研究 ABSTRACTStudy on the Right of Control in International Carriage of Goods by Sea under the Conditions of Bills of LadingABSTRACTIn the field of international carriage of goods, international convention relating to other transport ways than maritime transport has already stipulated some provisions involving right of control. As to maritime transport, although in 1990 CMI Uniform Rules for Sea Waybills and CMI Rules for Electronic Bills of Lading has referred to the right of control, they are far cannot satisfy the needs of development of practice of modern maritime transport owing to rather narrow scope of application. Moreover, the foundation of uniform system of the right of control will greatly relieve some challenges and difficulties of system of bills of lading. As a new international convention in the field of international carriage of goods by sea, Rotterdam Rules stipulates a set of new rules that aiming to update, coordinate and integrate the currently existing rules of international carriage of goods by sea involving to maritime section, and makes outstanding contribution of adopting to the field of container cargo transport, multimodal transport and emerce. As a new legal system, the right of control is stipulated in chapter ten of Rotterdam Rules. Base on the provisions of Rotterdam Rules, this paper discusses the influences of right of control on currently existing legal system of maritime law by means of systematically analyzing the said right, and the use of right of control for reference to China Maritime Code.Besides preface and conclusion, this paper is divided into four chapters as follows: Chapter one discusses the history of right of control and the necessity of creating the said right under bills of lading transport from two aspects, namely, it’s the requirement of joining the trade law with transport law, and the development of the system of bills of lading under the law of carriage of goods by sea. Chapter two clarifies the content and parties of the right of control. Generally speaking, the right to control refers to right that shipper and the person who is entitled to the right of transport contract pursuant to stipulations of the law, according to the transport contract, without prejudice to normal operations of carrier and interests of other owners of goods on the same voyage, gives instructions to the carrier relating to the matter of transporting or delivering the goods under the transport contract during the period of the carrier’s responsibility. The content of the right of control mainly includes three control party’s rights, there are, the right of giving or modifying instructions to carrier, the right to obtain delivery of the goods in port of call and the right to replace the consignee. The parties are divided into controlling party and the party of duty referring to the carrier. Chapter three expatiates on the exercise and legal nature of the right of control. In respect of the exercise of the said right, this chapter deals with such issues as ways and the period of exercising the said right. The ways of exercising the right of control vary with the types of bills of lading and the period of exercising the said right shall be period of responsibility of the carrier. The legal nature of the right of control which having certain characters of real right is essentially specific right of claim in credit. Chapter four focuses on the relevant legal questions of rights of controlling party and the use of right of control for reference to China Maritime Code. The foundation of system of right of the controlling party will has certain influences on such currently existing legal systems as straight bills of lading, delivery of goods with producing original bill of lading, right of stoppage in transit and FOB trade term. According to current leg