【正文】 果與立法目的、民眾期望值尚有一定距離。因此各國(guó)均極為關(guān)注。 新行政訴訟法視角下法院審理行政案件路徑研究 目 錄 摘要 ................................................................ Ⅰ Abstract ................................................................... Ⅱ ...................................................................... 1 研究背景 ................................................................ 1 歷史背景 .............................................................. 1 政治背景 .............................................................. 3 文化背景 .............................................................. 3 法治背景 .............................................................. 4 研究目的、意義及方法 ..................................................... 5 ............................................................... 5 ............................................................... 7 ............................................................... 9 文獻(xiàn)綜述 ............................................................... 10 研究難點(diǎn)、創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)及不足 .................................................. 12 .................................. 14 新行政訴訟法基本概述 .................................................... 14 .............................................. 15 .......................................... 16 .................................................... 17 法院審理行政案件路徑的內(nèi)涵 .............................................. 20 .............................................. 20 ........................................ 20 ................................................ 21 ........................ 21 18條第 2款關(guān)于跨行政區(qū)域管轄行政案件路徑分析 ...................... 21 修法之前司法實(shí)踐向 “法院跨行政 區(qū)域管轄行政案件” 靠攏的節(jié)點(diǎn) ........... 21 修法之前司法實(shí)踐向 “法院跨行政區(qū)域管轄行政案件” 靠攏的不足 ........... 22 8 8 8 8 86條關(guān)于審理簡(jiǎn)易程序的實(shí)施 ........................ 22 .................................................... 22 ................................................ 22 ................................................ 23 63條關(guān)于審理行政案件的參照范圍分析 ................................ 24 ...................................... 25 、裁定書(shū) ...................................... 25 徑分析 ........................ 26 《行政訴訟法》 第 18條第 2款為中心新法之 “人民法院跨行政區(qū)域管轄行政案件” 的具體解讀與實(shí)現(xiàn)路徑 ................................................... 26 《行政訴訟法》 第 18條第 2款的 “人民法院跨行政區(qū)域管轄行政案件” ， 不宜被理解為對(duì)異地交叉管轄司法實(shí)踐的認(rèn)可與改進(jìn) ................................ 26 新 《行政訴訟法》 第 18 條第 2 款的 “人民法院跨行政區(qū)域管轄行政案件” ，可以通過(guò)擴(kuò)大行政訴訟選擇管轄的適用范圍的方式而便捷實(shí)現(xiàn) ....................... 26 把擴(kuò)大行政訴訟選擇管轄的適用范圍作為實(shí)現(xiàn)“人民法院跨行政區(qū)域管轄行政案件 ”的捷徑，在審理理論與實(shí)踐路徑方面的探索 ...................................... 26 8 8 8 8 86條關(guān)于審理簡(jiǎn)易程序的實(shí)施，在審理方面的建議 .. 27 .................................................. 27 .................................................. 27 .............................................. 28 63條關(guān)于審理行政案件的參照范圍方面的建議 ...................... 28 ................................................ 28 ，查明被告不履行法定職責(zé)的建議 ............................. 29 .............................................. 29 5 結(jié)論與展望 ............................................................... 29 參考文獻(xiàn) ................................................................... 30 致謝辭 .............................................................. 31 I 摘要： 在訴訟法律制度中，行政訴訟法律制度作為監(jiān)督、制約國(guó)家行政權(quán)利、保護(hù)行政相對(duì)人合法權(quán)益的法律制度，因其特殊性而倍受司法界及民眾關(guān)注。從人權(quán)保障、權(quán)力監(jiān)督以及依法行政的角度出發(fā)，行政訴訟法律制度既是一個(gè)國(guó)家民主政治制度的法律保障及集中體現(xiàn)，同時(shí)也是一個(gè)國(guó)家民主政治制度的標(biāo)志及高度文明、重視人權(quán)的體現(xiàn)。我國(guó)的《行政訴訟法》在促進(jìn)依法行政、解決行政爭(zhēng)議以及維護(hù)民眾權(quán)益方面發(fā)揮了一定作用，對(duì)我國(guó)的民主政治也起到了積極的維護(hù)及促進(jìn)作用。法院獨(dú)立審判權(quán)頻繁被地方行政權(quán)干頇。《行政訴訟法》第 18 條第 2 款對(duì)此做了詳細(xì)規(guī)定，據(jù)此規(guī)定，修改后的《行政訴訟法》賦與高級(jí)人民法院確定某些人民法院跨行政區(qū)域管轄行政案件的權(quán)利。而路徑是保障制度實(shí)施必不可缺的關(guān)鍵環(huán)節(jié)。 關(guān)鍵詞 ：管轄權(quán)實(shí)施路徑 行政干預(yù)司法獨(dú)立權(quán) 法律缺失 Abstract in the legal system of litigation, administrative litigation law system as a supervision and restraint state administrative rights, the legal system for protecting the lawful rights and interests of administrative relative person, because of its particularity in the judiciary and public the perspective of human rights protection, power supervision and administration according to law, the legal system of administrative litigation is a national democratic political system of legal protection and concentrated reflection, is also a sign of a national democratic political system and highly civilized, attaches great importance to the embodiment of human countries are seriously.Administrative II procedural law of our country in promoting administration according to law, to solve administrative disputes and safeguard citizens rights has played a role, to our country39。s expectations are still certain jurisdiction frequently by local administrative power dry Han new administrative procedural law broke the line under the jurisdiction of the people39。s jurisdiction independence, constitute a major highlight of the new administrative procedural law.Administrative procedural law the second paragraph of article 18 of this detailed rules, according to this regulation, the revised administrative procedural law fu and some of the people39。s court to determine the rights of the administrative areas under the jurisdiction of administrative , although the higher people39。s courts across the administrative areas under the jurisdiction of administrative cases shortcut, according to our country39。Judicial independence and the administrative department for intervention in China, solving the civil administrative dispute overlapping approach and improve the system of administrative litigation evidence and other hot issues are analyzed, to improve the system of administrative litigation of our country, the solution of administrative litigation system in China and mismatch problem between the social and economic development in our country, the judicial power to prevent security admin