使用紅外線(xiàn)鼓膜溫度計(jì)測(cè)量鼓膜溫度的準(zhǔn)確性外文翻譯-文庫(kù)吧資料
2025-05-22 16:22本頁(yè)面
【正文】 on: a report of three cases and review of the literature. Ann Saudi Med 2020, 21:59–61. AL, Moore RL, Cavey A, Ashley EA, Stepniewska K, Nosten F, McGready R: Comparability of tympanic and oral mercury thermometers at high ambient temperatures. BMC Res Notes 2020, 16:5. 356. JM: A brief history of the clinical thermometer. QJM 2020, 95:251–252. SFL, LanHing L, InChak Y, Andrew WC: Should we replace the mercury in glass thermometer with the tympanic thermometer? Ann Coll Surg HK 2020, 7:18–22. JM, Terndrup TE, Alexander DT, Silverstone FA, WolfKlein G, O’Donnell R, Grandner J: Determination of normal ear temperature with an infrared emission detection thermometer. Ann Emerg Med 1995, 25:15–20. JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, 1:307–310. Fulbrook P: Core temperature measurement in adults: a literature review. J Adv Nurs 1993, 18:1451–1460. I, Kara A, Ceyhan M, Tezer H, Uluda? AK, Cengiz AB, Yi?itkanl I, Se231。C(P ) in the febrile group and 177。C (95% CI: –) [10]. More than one reading was used by Chueetal., and only one reading was used in the current study. Likewise, Rabbanietal., 2020 reached the same conclusion, especially in young patients, where both tympanic membrane and oral cavity temperatures were recorded, as well as oral temperature as standard [20]. However, Edeluetal., 2020 pared infrared tympanic thermometer in oral mode with mercury glass thermometer readings for measuring the temperature in febrile and afebrile children less than 5 years old, and found a mean difference of 177。 ) 176。C (Table 1). There was a positive correlation between body temperature using axillary and tympanic methods (r = , P 。 axillary) and (。 % were children 18 years), all of whom were medical cases. There were 95 (%) males, their mean age (SD) was () years (range 2–80 years) and mean weight (SD) was () kg. likewise for the females, the mean age (SD) was years (range 2–80) and the mean weight (SD) was () kg. Out of these 174 patients, 61 (%) patients were febrile (temperature176。 176。C and then placed, for a minimum of 5 minutes, in the patient’s axilla. The same healthcare worker would read and document the digital reading from the tympanic membrane thermometer and the mercury bulb thermometer. Immediately, another member of the team would then read and document the mercury thermometer, blinded from the results of the original healthcare worker. Statistical analyses The results were analyzed using SPSS, version for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Linear correlations were made between tympanic and axillary temperatures. Differences between sets of data were plotted as described by BlandAltman [14]. Based on previously predefined clinically acceptable limits, agreement between tympanic and axillary measurement methods was accepted when the mean 177。C. Only those thermometers with a deviation of less than 176。C. Conclusion: In this study, tympanic membrane thermometry is as reliable and accurate as axillary mercury glass thermometry. Thus, tympanic thermometry can be used in clinical practice, especially in the emergency setting, where ease of use and speed of obtaining the temperature reading are important. Keywords: Tympanic membrane, Axillary temperature, Sudan, Infrared, Thermometry Background: Measurement of body temperature is one of the oldest known diagnostic methods and still remains an important indicator of health and disease, both in everyday life and in medical care [1].
畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1