畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)外文翻譯---國際建設(shè)工程風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分析(參考版)
2025-05-16 23:18本頁面
【正文】 and reduce risk for the client, the architect and the CM. CM at Risk, a more professional approach to construction, is taking its place along with designbuild, bridging and the more traditional process of designbidbuild as an established method of project delivery. 畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)（論文）外文文獻(xiàn)翻譯 9 The AE can review the CM?s approach to the work, making helpful remendations. The CM is allowed to take bids or proposals from subcontractors during pletion of contract documents, prior to the guaranteed maximum price (GMP), which reduces the CM?s risk and provides useful input to design. The procedure is more methodical, manageable, predictable and less risky for all. The procurement of construction is also more businesslike. Each trade contractor has a fair shot at being the low bidder without fear of bid shopping. Each must deliver the best to get the projec. Competition in the munity is more equitable: all subcontractors have a fair shot at the work. A contingency within the GMP covers unexpected but justifiable costs, and a contingency above the GMP allows for client changes. As long as the subcontractors are within the GMP they are reimbursed to the CM, so the CM represents the client in negotiating inevitable changes with subcontractors. There can be similar problems where each party in a project is separately insured. For this reason a move towards project insurance is remended. The traditional approach reinforces adversarial attitudes, and even provides incentives for people to overlook or conceal risks in an attempt to avoid or transfer responsibility. A contingency within the GMP covers unexpected but justifiable costs, and a contingency above the GMP allows for client changes. As long as the subcontractors are within the GMP they are reimbursed to the CM, so the CM represents the client in negotiating inevitable changes with subcontractors. There can be similar problems where each party in a project is separately insured. For this reason a move towards project insurance is remended. The traditional approach reinforces adversarial attitudes, and even provides incentives for people to overlook or conceal risks in an attempt to avoid or transfer responsibility. It was reasonable to assume that between them the defects should have been detected earlier and rectified in good time before the partial roof failure. It did appear justified for the plaintiff to have brought a negligence claim against both the contractor and the architects. 畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)（論文）外文文獻(xiàn)翻譯 10 In many projects clients do not understand the importance of their role in facilitating cooperation and coordination。 produce a more manageable, predictable project。 centralize responsibility for construction under a single contract。 Bath (HLB). The contract was awarded to Central African Building Corporation (CABCO) who was also responsible for the provision of a specialist roof structure using patented “gang nail” roof trusses. The building construction proceeded to pletion and was handed over to the owners on Sept. 12, 1991. The SAZ took effective occupation of the headquarters building without a certificate of occupation. Also, the defects liability period was only three months. The roof structure was in place 10 years before partial failure in December 1999. The building insurance coverage did not cover enough, the City of Har
畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1