【正文】 ou and me, those fees arent bad, theyre okay, but they are prohibitive to so many millions of poor immediately, were rejecting ，扶持當(dāng)代知識分子的這些“巨人肩膀不必非得具有英文能力，他們不需要通過英語考試。愛因斯坦就是典型的例子。順便說一下，他在學(xué)校還曾被認(rèn)為需要課外補習(xí)，因為他其實有閱讀障礙。但對整個世界來說,很幸運的當(dāng)時他不需要通過英語考試，因為他們直到1964年才開始使用托福?，F(xiàn)在英語測驗太泛濫了，有太多太多的英語測驗，以及成千上萬的學(xué)生每年都在參加這些考試?，F(xiàn)在你會認(rèn)為，你和我都這么想，這些費用不貴，價錢滿合理的。但是對數(shù)百萬的窮人來說，這些費用高不可攀。所以，當(dāng)下我們又拒絕了他們。it brings to mind a headline i saw recently: education: the great i get it, i understand why people would focus on want to give their children the best chance in to do that, they need a western , of course, the best jobs go to people out of the western universities, that i put on a circular ：“教育：大鴻溝”現(xiàn)在我懂了。我了解為什么大家都重視英語，因為他們希望給孩子最好的人生機會。為了達(dá)成這目的，他們需要西方教育。畢竟，不可否認(rèn)，最好的工作都留給那些西方大學(xué)畢業(yè)出來的人。就像我之前說的，這是一種循環(huán)。 me tell you a story about two scientists, two english were doing an experiment to do with genetics and the forelimbs and the hind limbs of they couldnt get the results they really didnt know what to do, until along came a german scientist who realized that they were using two words for forelimb and hind limb, whereas genetics does not differentiate and neither does bingo, problem you cant think a thought, you are if another language can think that thought, then, by cooperating, we can achieve and learn so much ，我跟你們說一個關(guān)于兩位科學(xué)家的故事：有兩位英國科學(xué)家在做一項實驗，是關(guān)于遺傳學(xué)的，以及動物的前、后肢。但他們無法得到他們想要的結(jié)果。他們真的不知道該怎么辦，直到來了一位德國的科學(xué)家。他發(fā)現(xiàn)在英文里前肢和后肢是不同的二個字，但在遺傳學(xué)上沒有區(qū)別。在德語也是同一個字。所以，叮！問題解決了。如果你不能想到一個念頭，你會卡在那里。但如果另一個語言能想到那念頭，然后通過合作我們可以達(dá)成目的，也學(xué)到更多。我的女兒從科威特來到英格蘭，她在阿拉伯的學(xué)校學(xué)習(xí)科學(xué)和數(shù)學(xué)。那是所阿拉伯中學(xué)。在學(xué)校里，她得把這些知識翻譯成英文，而她在班上卻能在這些學(xué)科上拿到最好的成績。這告訴我們，當(dāng)外籍學(xué)生來找我們，我們可能無法針對他們所知道的給予贊賞，因為那是來自于他們母語的知識。當(dāng)一個語言消失時，我們不知道還有什么也會一并失去。this isi dont know if you saw it on n recentlythey gave the heroes award to a young kenyan shepherd boy who couldnt study at night in his village like all the village children,篇三：世上最好的演講：ted演講吸引人的秘密 why ted talks are better than the last speech you sat through 世上最好的演講：ted演講吸引人的秘密 think about the last time you heard someone give a speech, or any formal it was so long that you were either overwhelmed with data, or you just tuned the speaker powerpoint was involved, each slide was probably loaded with at least 40 words or figures, and odds are that you dont remember more than a tiny bit of what they were supposed to 。它也許太長了，以至于你被各種數(shù)據(jù)搞得頭昏腦脹，甚或干脆不理會演講者。如果演講者使用了ppt文檔，那么每張幻燈片很可能塞入了至少40個單詞或數(shù)字，但你現(xiàn)在或許只記得一丁點內(nèi)容。pretty uninspiring, huh? talk like ted: 9 publicspeaking secrets of the worlds best mindsexamines why in prose thats as lively and appealing as, well, a ted to coincide with the 30th anniversary in march of those nowlegendary ted conferences, the book draws on current brain science to explain what wins over, and fires up, an audienceand what carmine gallo also studied more than 500 of the most popular ted speeches(there have been about 1,500 so far)and interviewed scores of the people who gave ，是吧？《像ted那樣演講：全球頂級人才九大演講秘訣》(talk like ted: 9 publicspeaking secrets of the worlds best minds)一書以流暢的文筆審視了為什么ted演講如此生動，如此引人入勝。出版方有意安排在今年3月份發(fā)行此書，以慶賀如今已成為經(jīng)典的ted大會成立30周年。這部著作借鑒當(dāng)代腦科學(xué)解釋了什么樣的演講能夠說服聽眾、鼓舞聽眾，什么樣的演講無法產(chǎn)生這種效果。much of what he found out is , for instance, the fact that each ted talk is limited to 18 might sound too short to convey ted curator chris anderson imposed the time limit, he told gallo, because its long enough to be serious and short enough to hold peoples attention...by forcing speakers who are used to going on for 45 minutes to bring it down to 18, you get them to think about what they really want to also the perfect length if you want your message to go viral, anderson 。例如，每場ted演講都被限制在18分鐘以內(nèi)。聽起來太過短暫，似乎無法傳達(dá)足夠多訊息。然而，ted大會策辦人克里斯?安德森決議推行這項時間限制規(guī)則，因為“這個時間長度足夠莊重，同時又足夠短，能夠吸引人們的注意力。通過迫使那些習(xí)慣于滔滔不絕講上45分鐘的嘉賓把演講時間壓縮至18分鐘，你就可以讓他們認(rèn)真思考他們真正想說的話，”他對加洛說。此外，安德森說，如果你希望你的訊息像病毒般擴散，這也是一個完美的時間長度。recent neuroscience shows why the time limit works so well: people listening to a presentation are storing data for retrieval in the future, and too much information leads to cognitive overload, which gives rise to elevated levels of anxietymeaning that, if you go on and on, your audience will start to resist worse, they wont recall a single point you were trying to ：聆聽陳述的人們往往會存儲相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)，以備未來檢索之用，而太多的信息會導(dǎo)致“認(rèn)知超負(fù)荷”，進(jìn)而推升聽眾的焦慮度。它意味著，如果你說個沒完沒了，聽眾就會開始抗拒你。更糟糕的是，他們不會記得你努力希望傳遞的信息點，甚至可能一個都記不住。如何把一個復(fù)雜的陳述壓縮至18分鐘左右？加洛就這個問題提供了一些小建議，其中包括他所稱的“三的法則”。具體說就是，把大量觀點高度濃縮為三大要點。ted大會上的許多演講高手就是這樣做的。他還指出，即使一篇演講無法提煉到這樣的程度，單是這番努力也一定能改善演講的效果：“僅僅通過這番提煉，你就可以大大增強陳述的創(chuàng)造性和影響力?！?then theres represents the end of powerpoint as we know it, writes hastens to add that theres nothing wrong with powerpoint as a tool, but that most speakers unwittingly make it work against them by cluttering up their slides with way too many words(40, on average)and ?！皌ed大會象征著我們所知的ppt文檔正走向終結(jié)，”加洛寫道。他隨后又馬上補充說，作為工具的powerpoint本身并沒有什么錯，但大多數(shù)演講者為他們的幻燈片塞進(jìn)了太多的單詞（平均40個）和數(shù)字，讓這種工具不經(jīng)意間帶來了消極影響。the remedy for that, based on the most riveting ted talks: if you must use slides, fill them with a lot more again, research backs this up, with something academics call the picture superiority effect: three days after hearing or reading a set of facts, most people will remember about 10% of the a photo or a drawing, and recall jumps to 65%.最吸引人的ted演講為我們提供了一個補救策略：如果你必須使用幻燈片，務(wù)必記得要大量運用圖像資源。這種做法同樣有科學(xué)依據(jù)，它就是研究人員所稱的“圖優(yōu)效應(yīng)”(picture superiority effect)：聽到或讀到一組事實三天后，大多數(shù)人會記得大約10%的信息。而添加一張照片或圖片后，記憶率將躍升至65%。one study, by molecular biologist john medina at the university of washington school of medicine, found that not only could people recall more than 2,500 pictures with at least 90% accuracy several days later, but accuracy a whole year afterward was still at about 63%.華盛頓大學(xué)醫(yī)學(xué)院(university of washington school of medicine)分子生物學(xué)家約翰?梅迪納主持的研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，幾天后，人們能夠回想起超過2,500張圖片，準(zhǔn)確率至少達(dá)到90%；一年后的準(zhǔn)確率依然保持在63%左右。that result demolishes print and speech, both of which were tested on the same group of subjects, medinas study indicated, which is something worth bearing in mind for anybody hoping that his or her ideas will be ，這個結(jié)果“完勝”印刷品和演講的記憶效果（由同一組受試者測試）。任何一位希望自己的思想被聽眾銘記在心的演講者或許都應(yīng)該記住這一點。篇四：ted演講稿我是個說書之人。在這里，我想和大家分享一些我本人的故事。一些關(guān)于所謂的“單一故事的危險性”的經(jīng)歷。我