外文翻譯--淺析郵政服務(wù)與快遞服務(wù)的異同-其他專(zhuān)業(yè)-資料下載頁(yè)
【導(dǎo)讀】在發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家服務(wù)業(yè)占國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)的份額很大。例如在歐盟和美國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展過(guò)程。中大約百分之七十、百分之八十都開(kāi)展了服務(wù)專(zhuān)欄。貿(mào)易增加了服務(wù)的重要性在。2021年大約28和22的服務(wù)來(lái)自于歐盟、美國(guó)的出口總占整個(gè)經(jīng)合組織的19左右。貿(mào)易的比例已從1980年的9大約是發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家一半的份額上升到2021年的18。鑒于貿(mào)易的復(fù)雜性和多樣化的特點(diǎn)全球貿(mào)易自由化更加細(xì)膩。然而很多服務(wù)領(lǐng)域還包括政府的參與或是某些領(lǐng)域的國(guó)家特權(quán)由“服務(wù)貿(mào)。易總協(xié)定”確認(rèn)。此外在貨物貿(mào)易方面往往是外國(guó)直接投資顯然存在著貿(mào)易和外國(guó)。事實(shí)上全球自由貿(mào)易。國(guó)家和許多中等收入國(guó)家中。哈回合談7判有至少包括一項(xiàng)農(nóng)業(yè)自由化的政策。關(guān)聯(lián)卻并不意味著后者導(dǎo)致前者。因?yàn)閮烧咧g的“服務(wù)貿(mào)易總協(xié)定”的定義范圍明確的實(shí)質(zhì)性分歧。止在多哈議程談判的進(jìn)展情況。目前的情況并不適合過(guò)于樂(lè)觀作為建議已提交。維亞和香港和發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家歐盟美國(guó)新西蘭經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)提交提案的數(shù)量。政治現(xiàn)實(shí),可能會(huì)產(chǎn)生一定的誤解。
【正文】 countries. C. Existing Positions Regarding Liberalization As the WTO begins its preparations for the Doha Trade Agenda express delivery services will likely play a greater role than they ever have in the past. The industry has been growing rapidly and has bee very international even without GATSrelated liberalization helping to foster it. At present the situation does not lend itself to too much optimism as a number of proposals that have been tabled thus far are conservative and will probably do little. Thus far there have been a number of proposals tabled in the general area of postal and courier services made by developing MERCOSUR Bolivia and Hong Kong and developed EU US New Zealand economies. One approach19 involves eliminating a distinction between postal services and courier services. Another approach defines express delivery services specifically as being separate from courier and postal services and having a single heading. Under this approach then memberstates would be able to propose liberalization of express delivery services directly. This heading could then bee part of a broader range of transportation activities in the globalization of the supplychain management. 4 Summary The salient results of this study can be summarized as follows: Services in general and trade in services in particular have bee increasingly important to developed and developing countries both as final products and as inputs to other productive activities. The relationship between services and FDI (under mode 3 )is extremely strong hence services liberalization is important as a means of attracting FDI which has proven to be a key catalyst in the development process. Developingcountry stakes are therefore particularly high in global services liberalization as efficient services are necessary in order to help these countries pete internationally and attract foreign firms as partners in the development process. GATS has taken on great significance in the 21st Century particularly for developing countries and successful liberalization of services under the Doha Trade Agenda will be extremely important in setting the course for the future. We have used the express delivery services case as an example of how this process plays out in the plicated political economy of services liberalization. We have stressed that it is imperative to separate postal services from express delivery services as they are separate sectors and reform of the latter can actually help promote the former through its plementarity and general enhancement of efficiency. It is in the interest of all parties to do this. However if a separation is not clearly made progress in the Doha Round is unlikely given political realities and probable misunderstandings
鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1