【文章內(nèi)容簡介】
60。ConventionwasapplicablebecausetheSwissbranch,nottheLiechtensteinheadquarters,wastheplaceofbusinessthathadtheclosestrelationshiptothecontractanditsperformance.CISGart.1,101/24/2023 21Chapter 2 ITL Contract Laws The Relevant International Conventions 4. Application Scope of CISG (2) What is the scope of “goods” in CISG? Excludes:(a) for personal, family or household use, unless the seller, at any time before or at the conclusion of the contract, neither knew nor ought to have known that the goods were bought for any such use。 (b) By auction。 (c) On execution or otherwise by authority of law。 (d) Of stocks[1], shares[2], investment securities[3], negotiable instruments[4] or money。 (e) Of ships, vessels, hovercraft or aircraft。 (f) Of electricity. [1]股票 [2]股份 [3]投資債券 [4]流通票據(jù)1/24/2023 22Chapter 2 ITL Contract Laws The Relevant International Conventions 4. Application Scope of CISG 252。(3) Sales: 1) must transfer the property。 2) must be paid in money.Exclude: private and house use exchange, execution, trade of service and 三來一補(bǔ) .1/24/2023 23Chapter 2 ITL Contract Laws The Relevant International Conventions 4. Application Scope of CISG 252。(4) Contract: not concerned with: (A) the validity of the contract or of any of its provisions or of any usage。 (B) the effect which the contract may have on the property in the goods sold. (C) The liability of the seller for death or personal injury caused by the goods to any person. 1/24/2023 24Chapter 2 ITL Contract LawsCase n Thedefendants,twoSwisssellersofputersoftware,attachedtheSwissbankaccountsoftheplaintiff,aFrenchbuyer,andaskedforspecificperformanceofthesaleofsoftwarecontract,whichhadbeendeclaredavoidedbytheplaintiff.n ThecourtruledunderSwisslawinfavorofthedefendants.n BecauseCISGenterintoforceinSWon1March1991,whilethecontractwasconcludedon21Sep.1990.PursuanttoCISGart.100,CISGonlyapplytocontractsconcludedonorafter1March1991.1/24/2023 25Chapter 2 ITL Contract LawsCase 2n Thedefendant,anAustriansellerofimportedItaliancars,soldaLambhiniCountachtotheplaintiff,aSwissbuyer.Theseller,however,couldnotdeliverthecartothebuyer.Thecourtheldthatsincethatcarwaspurchasedforpersonaluse,inaccordancewithitsarticle2(a),theCISGwasnotapplicabletothecase.Netherless,thecourtstatedthattheCISGcouldhavebeenappliedtothecaseifthefactthattheseller“neitherknewnoroughttohav