【正文】 hina t r adit ional indust r y of pig pr oduction of j ob way and pr ofit way ar e r equir ements r elat ed indust r y f or r esour ces int egration, t o qualit y securit y f or pr emise, r egulat ion based f ar ming, and m anagement cost and t he pr oduct ion, and sales cost, go st andar dizat ion, and scale, and int ensive, and m ar ket r oad, f ast upgr ade whole indust r y chain of r egulat ion capacit y, m ar ket petit ion capacit y and anti r isk capacit y. Fir st , indust r y analysis ( a) t he basic sit uation in China is a t r adit ional hog pr oduction and consum pt ion countr y, 2020 m ilon t ons of por k, pig st ock 462. 64 mil ion head by t he end pig slaught er 609. 6 m ilon. Nat ional pig indust r y39。s m eat consum ption habit s and economic analysis of t he developm ent sit uation, t he em er gence of new t r ends in t he m ar ket of dom est ic por k and it s pr oduct s. Docking is a pig pr oduction and sales m or e closely. The Yangtze River Delt a, Pearl River Delt a and t he Bohai r im econom ic developed ar ea indust rial st r uct ure adj ustm ent gat her ed pace, t wo or t hr ee indust ries t o t he Centr al and West er n bias. Second, t he r igid dom estic consum pt ion gr owt h. For a long per iod, por k is st il t he lar gest var iet y of m eat consumption in China, t he absolut e consumption cont inues t o gr ow. Especially in t he vast r ural m ar ket gr owt h pot ential. Thir d, m ar ket f or por k and higher pr oduct qualit y r equir em ent s. Polut ion f r ee por k saf et y and healt h has shown a ver y good m ar ket pr ospect s. Four is t he m ar ket changing. Cur ent ly, cold m eat , m or e and m or e var iet ies of m eat and por k m eat pr oduct s, which account ed f or a lar ge pr opor tion of por k consum pt ion, st or es, chain st or es, super m ar ket s and ot her m ar keting m et hods is on t he r ise, and t r anspor t has been ext ended t o m or e t han 2020 km in RADI US. Chengdu is an im por t ant River pig r esour ce m ar ket , t he cit y39。s ser vice char ges ( met er pr ices [ 2020] 1980) r ules of t he Ni h, t ender agent ser vice char ges using t he dif f erence pr ogressive bilng r at e. Charges in accordance wit h t he t ender ing agent 39。s ser vice charge contr ol t he upper and lower lim it s, Cap f or t he St ate Developm ent Planning Com mission of t he int erim m easures f or t he m anagement of t endering agent 39。s service f ees under 100%, t he lower limit f or t he St ate Development Planning Commission of t he int er im measures f or t he m anagem ent of t ender ing agent39。s ser vice f ees under 80%. Tendering agent 39。s ser vice f ees. Tendering agent 39。s service char ge of not if ication on t he r elevant issues ( the change pr ice [ 2020] 857) . Sale of pr equalif ication docum ents and solicit at ion docum ents going t o choose all, pr icing should be based on t he pr inciple of pr ofit not f iles, m ust not violat e t he r elevant pr ovisions in t he pr ice Depart ment . 4. 7 r equir ement s in t he f or m of applicat ion pr oxy application shall be pr epar ed in t he 5t h chapter of t he f or mat. Applicat ion of various suppor t ing docum ent s should be r equested by t he selection of f iles gr ouped by order . Com par ison and selection of t he bidding agencies must pr ovide support ing documents r equir ed by t he f ile。 ( 2) licence and a bidding agent qualif icat ions m eet t he r equir ement s。 ( 4) t he t ender ing Agency int ends t o put int o t his pr oj ect t he num ber of pr of essionals t o m eet t he r equir em ents。 ( 6) no f r aud case. 8. 2 applicat ion r eview in det ail t he Evaluat ion Com mit t ee t hr ough pliance r eviews wil l be select ed f or det ailed r eview of t he applicat ion. 8. t ender agent inst it ut ions im ilar pr oj ect t ender per form ance r equir em ents ( 16 point s) t ender agent inst it utions sim ilar pr oj ect ender per f orm ance 16 point s, by t wo par t posit ion ( 1) agent sim ilar pr oj ect of cum ulat ive bid am ount scor ed calculat ion r ules f or : Agent wat er pr oj ect bid am ount ( on J anuar y 1, 2020 has has bid not ice f or associat e) cum ulat ive each r eached 100 m ilon Yuan have 2 point s, wat er pr oject cum ulat ive bid am ount scor ed up not over 6 point s. I n addit ion, plet es a bid wor t h m or e t han 500 m ilon yuan in t ot al 1 m inut e, but ot her it em s scor e accum ulat ed winning am ount up t o a m axim um of 6 point s. ( 2) calculation r ule f or t he num ber of agent s im ilar pr oj ect s: pr oxy bid am ount ( since J anuar y 1, 2020 winning not ice shall pr evail) bidding pr oj ect s in m or e t han 50 m ilon Yuan by 2 point s, but t he Agency pr oj ect s t he num ber of scor es up t o 3 m inut es. 8. t o be agents of t he const ruction pr oj ect as a pr oj ect m anager in t he sam e pr oj ect per f orm ance ( 10 point s) Pr oj ect M anager agent perf orm ance scor es including agent s of t he bidding agenc ies of sim ilar pr oj ect s, as well as in ot her sim ilar pr oj ect endering agency service agent dur ing per f or mance. Tot al 10 Pr oj ect M anager agent per f orm ance, m ade up of t wo par ts ( 1) act ing like t he accum ulat ed winning am ount calculat ion r ule: agents f or wat er conser vancy pr oj ect bid am ount ( since J anuar y 1, 2020 winning not ice f or example) cumulat ive average r eached 100 m ilon Yuan 3 but scor ed no m or e t han 5 m inut es. ( 2) calculat ion r ule f or t he num ber of agents sim ilar pr ojects: pr oxy bid am ount ( since J anuar y 1, 2020 winning not ice f or exam ple) in t he m or e t han 50 m il ion Yuan wat er conservancy pr oj ect per iod of 3 m inut es, but scor es t he num ber of agent s im ilar pr oj ect s up t o a m axim um of 5 point s. Pr oj ect M anager dem onst r at ed t o pr ovincial level and higher peopl