【正文】 業(yè)體系兩種不同的體系。戰(zhàn)役學(xué)的專業(yè)體系是根據(jù)教學(xué)和研究的需要和可能,對戰(zhàn)役學(xué)的教學(xué)和研究領(lǐng)域進(jìn)行劃分的產(chǎn)物。建立戰(zhàn)役學(xué)專業(yè)體系，必須滿足四條原則。二是便于教學(xué)和研究工作的進(jìn)行。四是必須符合現(xiàn)實(shí)辦學(xué)和研究工作的條件。它設(shè)三個分學(xué)科：一是元理論分學(xué)科，下設(shè)本體論和方法論兩個專業(yè)；二是戰(zhàn)役研究分學(xué)科，下設(shè)戰(zhàn)役歷史、現(xiàn)實(shí)研究和戰(zhàn)役預(yù)測三個專業(yè)；三是戰(zhàn)役指導(dǎo)分學(xué)科，下設(shè)戰(zhàn)役指揮和戰(zhàn)役參謀兩個專業(yè)。戰(zhàn)役理論體系是關(guān)于戰(zhàn)役規(guī)律和進(jìn)行戰(zhàn)役的方式方法的系統(tǒng)知識。因此，前者可稱為戰(zhàn)役規(guī)律理論，后者是戰(zhàn)役法推導(dǎo)理論，可稱之為戰(zhàn)策推導(dǎo)理論。三是戰(zhàn)役法體系?？v向分類的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)是涉及內(nèi)容的方面；橫向的分類的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)是戰(zhàn)役法所適用的范圍。橫向劃分的體系由4個層次構(gòu)成，由高到底是：一般戰(zhàn)役法層次、類型戰(zhàn)役法層次、樣式戰(zhàn)役法層次、個例戰(zhàn)役法層次。它是以戰(zhàn)役學(xué)這門學(xué)科為研究對象的理論，以揭示戰(zhàn)役學(xué)這門新興而特殊的學(xué)科產(chǎn)生與發(fā)展的規(guī)律，用以指導(dǎo)學(xué)科建設(shè)。一是戰(zhàn)役學(xué)本體論，主要研究戰(zhàn)役學(xué)自身的各種特性。二是方法論。論文還對戰(zhàn)役學(xué)方法論進(jìn)行了進(jìn)一步的探討。在理論研究方法上，提出三項原則：運(yùn)用系統(tǒng)思想；定性定量結(jié)合；多種方法并用。二是戰(zhàn)役規(guī)律理論。為了廣泛、正確、深刻地揭示戰(zhàn)役規(guī)律，論文對于紛繁復(fù)雜的戰(zhàn)役現(xiàn)象進(jìn)行理論抽象。這是解開戰(zhàn)役現(xiàn)象之迷的鑰匙。戰(zhàn)役能量運(yùn)動方式可以歸結(jié)為三種：形成、消耗和補(bǔ)充。戰(zhàn)役基本單元的能量運(yùn)動過程是形成－消耗－補(bǔ)充。在這一理論基礎(chǔ)之上，論文初步建立了如下理論體系：戰(zhàn)役能量存在規(guī)律體系；戰(zhàn)役能量度量規(guī)律體系；戰(zhàn)役能量合成規(guī)律體系；戰(zhàn)役能量流動規(guī)律體系；戰(zhàn)役能量消耗規(guī)律體系；戰(zhàn)役能量補(bǔ)充規(guī)律體系。認(rèn)識戰(zhàn)役規(guī)律的目的，在于駕馭、運(yùn)用這些規(guī)律，以最小的代價奪取戰(zhàn)場上的最大勝利。戰(zhàn)役理論的第二項重大使命，就是要以戰(zhàn)役規(guī)律為依據(jù)，以戰(zhàn)場實(shí)際情況為基礎(chǔ)，用科學(xué)的方法推導(dǎo)、論證和檢驗(yàn)戰(zhàn)策，建立起完整而科學(xué)的戰(zhàn)策體系。一般戰(zhàn)策理論。個例戰(zhàn)策理論。個例戰(zhàn)策理論的核心問題可以歸納為三個。戰(zhàn)役概念體系，是指關(guān)于戰(zhàn)役各種要素、各個方面和各個層次現(xiàn)象或事物的一系列概念的集合。首先，論文根據(jù)概念所反映戰(zhàn)役的不同方面，將戰(zhàn)役概念劃分為六大類型。二是戰(zhàn)役時間類型。四是戰(zhàn)役行動類型。六是戰(zhàn)役基本范疇。同時指導(dǎo)發(fā)展概念體系的方向。一是要進(jìn)行概念體系的總體研究。同時要提高理論工作人員的科學(xué)文化素養(yǎng)。如戰(zhàn)役能量，戰(zhàn)役單元，戰(zhàn)策，戰(zhàn)策推導(dǎo)理論，戰(zhàn)役學(xué)元理論，等等。戰(zhàn)役指標(biāo)是反映戰(zhàn)役某一方面情況的可以用絕對數(shù)或相對數(shù)來表達(dá)的精確化的概念。論文對于戰(zhàn)役指標(biāo)體系的發(fā)展表現(xiàn)在兩個方面。論文提出的具體指標(biāo)有如下幾類。戰(zhàn)役出動率。戰(zhàn)役實(shí)際出動次數(shù)?！獞?zhàn)役效果指標(biāo)類：戰(zhàn)役損失率（Rl）、戰(zhàn)役損失期望（E損）、行動自由度（Fa）、行動能力下降指數(shù)等。一是力量強(qiáng)弱、大小對比度，這既包括數(shù)量，也包括素質(zhì)、人員士氣。意圖吻合度In。此外，還有戰(zhàn)役單元作戰(zhàn)效能這一指標(biāo)。戰(zhàn)役模型是用以模擬戰(zhàn)役結(jié)構(gòu)形態(tài)和運(yùn)動狀態(tài)形式的統(tǒng)稱。論文論證了模型體系必需具備的五種特性：有效性、透明性、可信性、可塑性和可行性。具體建立的模型有：模擬戰(zhàn)役戰(zhàn)場態(tài)勢值模型：A=K1Fa+K3Re+K5Ki229。Mj*Qijj=1m戰(zhàn)役方案風(fēng)險度求解模型：n229。Mj*Qij229。the trouble, however, lies in the fact that that is being done at the expense of basic theoretical instance: focussing on studies of “guiding principles” of campaigns while neglecting revelation of objective laws guiding campaigns, emphasizing presentation of new methodologies of military operations while overlooking the theoretical reasoning and demonstration of those methodologies, stressing Grounds for Selection and Purposes of the Subject development of new concepts while ignoring the necessity of defining them, and attempting to explore a macroscopic system of the science in the virtual absence of a theoretical basis posed of the norm system, model system, data system, analysis outweighing quantitative to the absence of the necessary norm system, data system and model system, and under the influence of the orthodox ways of research relying mainly on empirioanalogy and induction, theoretical research into this particular branch of learning has hitherto remained basically on the level of deliberation and reasoning with much generalized qualitative interpretation but little quantitative the exclusion of quantitative studies from textbooks and theoretical writings on the science of military campaigns, and of mathematics from the qualification examinations of postgraduates majoring in the science of military differences in understanding and interpreting several basic “military campaign” for example.“Military campaign” is the subject of research for the science of military campaigns, and is, therefore, one of the most fundamental , there has been difference between the armed forces of China and the USSR in the understanding of this a military operation in history the former sees as typical of military campaigns, fails, in the eyes of the latter, to constitute a military to the latter, military campaigns came into being only in the second half of the nineteenth century, while the former holds that they dated back as early as the Period of the Spring and Autumn, and the Warring Statesa difference of more than 2,400 years! and Logical Reasonings of the Thesis The body of the thesis consists of three parts: and analysis of three basic concepts， of the theories of military campaigns, and of a methodology of the on such a framework derives from the following logical reasonings: of basic concepts is the theoretical prerequisite of the development of the science of military campaigns.“Military campaigns”, “the art of military campaigns” and “the science of military campaigns” are a set of the most fundamental, and the most important academic concepts in the sphere of military indepth differentiation and analysis of those three concepts constitutes a vital part of the exploration and development of the basic theories of the science of military campaigns, one of the urgent tasks for the presentday theoretical circles of the science of military campaigns, and a prerequisite of the healthy development of that of the theories of military campaigns is the key to that of the science of military campaigns as a of military campaigns are the kernel and pillar of the science of military follows that the development of the science of military campaigns means, above all, that of theories of military campaigns, that is, the establishment of an allenpassing, scientific and rigorous theoretical system of military body of such a system consists of two parts: the theory of laws of military campaigns aimed at revealing the objective laws of military campaigns, and the inference theory of the art of military campaigns aimed at inferring and demonstrating the art of military campaigns or included in the thesis are a set of concepts, norms, data, models, etc, which serve as physical materials and bases for the construction of the abovementioned two main of a methodology is an important ponent of that of the science of military the subject of research of the discipline, military campaigns are full of randomness and is more, they are filled with deception and abnormality due to the deliberate application by the opposing sides of various strategies and is therefore more difficult to analyze military campaigns than ordinary social the demand for a methodology more advanced, more systematic and more powerful than for other fact is just the contrary: as a newly emerging branch of learning, and because of the various historical and social limitations, the currently adopted methodology of the science of military campaigns is poor and simple, rendering it difficult to conduct any thorough Conclusions and New Ideas of the