【正文】 oling and process changes documented over time. 按照時(shí)間進(jìn)度對(duì)模具和過(guò)程的變更進(jìn)行文件記錄 Can be divided into any type of appropriate sections, Prototype – Early Production Production, Alpha – Beta, etc. 可以按照任何適當(dāng)?shù)念悇e進(jìn)行分類，快速成型樣品 先期生產(chǎn) 量產(chǎn) AlphaBeta階段等 Key ponents only. Should follow high level process flow. 僅關(guān)鍵零件。 3. Design Responsibility 設(shè)計(jì)職責(zé) ? Design responsibility must be: 設(shè)計(jì)職責(zé)是必須要： – Clearly defined 定義清晰 – Agreed within the team 在團(tuán)隊(duì)中達(dá)成一致 – Documented through ownership of tech profile, DVP R, ID type codes (IMS), etc. 設(shè)計(jì)職責(zé)必須通過(guò)技術(shù)文件的所有者、 DVP R, ID 類型編碼等進(jìn)行記錄 ? Design related activities, if any required by the supplier, should be municated and agreed through the RFQ process. 如果供應(yīng)商對(duì)產(chǎn)品的設(shè)計(jì)有任何要求，應(yīng)當(dāng)在報(bào)價(jià)過(guò)程中針對(duì)這些與設(shè)計(jì)相關(guān)的項(xiàng)目進(jìn)行交流并達(dá)成一致意見(jiàn)。 3. Design Responsibility設(shè)計(jì)職責(zé) Typical ID Codes 典型的ID代碼 4. DVP R 設(shè)計(jì)驗(yàn)證計(jì)劃及報(bào)告 ? Design Validation Planning and Report 設(shè)計(jì)驗(yàn)證計(jì)劃及報(bào)告 ? Used when the supplier has design control or is performing design related activities 當(dāng)供應(yīng)商控制設(shè)計(jì)或執(zhí)行與設(shè)計(jì)相關(guān)的活動(dòng)時(shí)使用 ? Developed and agreed within the team 在團(tuán)隊(duì)內(nèi)開(kāi)發(fā)并協(xié)商一致 ? Feasibility agreed to with the supplier (best if prior to final quote) 就可行性問(wèn)題與供應(yīng)商協(xié)商一致（最好能在確定最終報(bào)價(jià)之前完成） ? Design inputs (tech profile) must be clearly defined, documented, and understood 必須清楚定義、記錄和理解設(shè)計(jì)輸入（技術(shù)文件） 4. DVP R 設(shè)計(jì)驗(yàn)證計(jì)劃及報(bào)告 ? Special consideration must be made for the risks associated with a supplier that does not have any experience with the new and/or unique products, processes, and engineering tasks that are being developed. 對(duì)正在開(kāi)發(fā)的新的和 /或獨(dú)特產(chǎn)品、過(guò)程和工程任務(wù)沒(méi)有經(jīng)驗(yàn)的供應(yīng)商，必須特別考慮其相關(guān)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)性。 4. DVP R設(shè)計(jì)驗(yàn)證計(jì)劃及報(bào)告 Reference to Tech Profile 參見(jiàn)技術(shù)文件 Requirements clear And very specific 要求清晰且詳細(xì) Responsibilities clearly defined. CTC versus supplier and engineer‘s name. 清楚定義職責(zé)則， CTC與供應(yīng)商和工程師的姓名 DVP R Example 設(shè)計(jì)驗(yàn)證計(jì)劃及報(bào)告的示例 5. Design FMEA 設(shè)計(jì)潛在失效模式與后果分析 ? Suppliers should request to review if Cummins responsibility 如果是康明斯負(fù)責(zé)設(shè)計(jì)，供應(yīng)商應(yīng)提出要求來(lái)回顧設(shè)計(jì)的 FMEA。 6. Design Review 設(shè)計(jì)評(píng)審 ? Suppliers should participate if Cummins‘ responsibility 如果是康明斯負(fù)責(zé)評(píng)審，供應(yīng)商應(yīng)參與 ? Suppliers must participate if supplier‘s responsibility 如果是供應(yīng)商負(fù)責(zé)評(píng)審，供應(yīng)商必須參與 ? Design review notes should be kept in Evidence Book 設(shè)計(jì)評(píng)審的記錄應(yīng)保存在證明文件記錄中 7. Prototype Control Plans 樣品控制計(jì)劃 ? Difficult to plete at prototype suppliers 在樣品供應(yīng)商處難以完成 ? Should be automatic at production suppliers 在產(chǎn)品供應(yīng)商處應(yīng)自動(dòng)化 ? Good opportunity to experiment with requirements and processes 試驗(yàn)要求與過(guò)程的好機(jī)會(huì) ? Source release is required for all prototype parts used in VPI builds 用于 VPI裝機(jī)上的所有樣品零件都要求貨源發(fā)放 8. Drawings and Specifications 圖紙和規(guī)范 ? Drawing control is very difficult 圖紙控制非常困難 ? Ensure preliminary drawings are identified 確保初步的圖紙有進(jìn)行標(biāo)識(shí) ? SQIE and Supplier DQR participation is critical 供應(yīng)商質(zhì)量改進(jìn)工程師供應(yīng)商圖紙質(zhì)量回顧的參與很重要 – DQR‘s also serve as technical reviews DQR‘s還承擔(dān)技術(shù)評(píng)審的工作 – DQR‘s also serve as feasibility reviews DQR‘s還承擔(dān)可行性評(píng)審的工作 ? Make sure suppliers have all appropriate CES 確保所有的供應(yīng)商都有適當(dāng)?shù)?CES 8. Drawings and Specifications 圖紙和規(guī)范 ? Supplier graphics are being more prevalent. 供應(yīng)商圖表越來(lái)越普遍 ? The goal of the Supplier Graphics process is to: 供應(yīng)商圖表過(guò)程的目的是： – Eliminate the confusion caused when Cummins and the supplier are using their own internally created specifications for the same item. 當(dāng)康明斯與供應(yīng)商針對(duì)同一個(gè)項(xiàng)目使用各自內(nèi)部創(chuàng)建的規(guī)范時(shí)，消除所引起的混淆。 9. Facilities, Equipment and Tools 設(shè)施、設(shè)備和工具 ? Time phase plan critical 時(shí)間階段計(jì)劃 – Include quality / PPAP steps 包括質(zhì)量 /PPAP步驟 ? List all equipment 列出所有的設(shè)備 ? Can use Gantt chart 可以使用干特圖 ? Sound the alarm at any delay 對(duì)任何延遲進(jìn)行提醒 9. Facilities, Equipment and Tools 設(shè)施、設(shè)備和工具 Include gauges and tooling in same plan 在同一個(gè)計(jì)劃中 要包含量具和其他工具 Includes timing for gauge studies and trial runs 包含量具研究和 試生產(chǎn)的時(shí)間 Plan should include plete project timing 計(jì)劃中應(yīng)該當(dāng)包含完整的項(xiàng)目時(shí)間進(jìn)度 Sound the Alarm at any delay! 如果有任何延遲要發(fā)出警告！ ? Typically documented via a Gantt chart 典型的方法是用甘特圖進(jìn)行記錄 ? Other similar methods acceptable 其他類似的方法也是可接受的 10. Gauging and Test Equipment 量具和檢測(cè)設(shè)備 ? Best to include in equipment plan 最好包含在設(shè)備計(jì)劃中 ? Same strategy applies 同樣的策略這里也適用 11. Preliminary Compatibility Matrix 初步兼容性矩陣 ? Similar to feasibility agreement 與可行性協(xié)議相似 – translates into Cummins language 翻譯成康明斯語(yǔ)言 – standard form available ( appendix ) 康明斯提供 標(biāo)準(zhǔn)格式 ( 附錄 ) 11. Preliminary Compatibility Matrix 初步兼容性矩陣 ? Completed by supplier 由供應(yīng)商完成 – use engineering judgments 使用工程判斷 – use information from prototypes 使用樣品制造過(guò)程中得到的一些信息 ? Focus on majors 集中主要精力在主要項(xiàng)目上 – consider all features 考慮所有的特性 ? Copy in evidence book 在證明資料文件中保留備份 11. Preliminary Compatibility Matrix 初步兼容性矩陣 Com pl et e an dRet urn b y : 1/ 1/ 20 01S up pl i er Nam e: X Dat e: 1/ 1/ 20 01Ret urn t oIte m Na m e: P art Nam e: MEIte m Nu m be r : 1234667 A dd r ess : T he r eChe c k h ere i f a l l th e P r od uct Cha r acteri s ti c s f or w hi c h y ou a r e r espon s i bl e c an b e m et10 0% o f th e ti m e.In di c at e be l ow th ose c ha r acteri s ti c s w hi c h c an n ot b e m et 1 00 % of th e ti m e. ( S ee a tta c he d i nstr ucti on s )S i gn at ure: J o hn D o e Dat e: 1/ 1/ 20 01T i tl e: Q ua l i ty M an ag erSU PPL I ER A SSE SSM EN T OF PR OC ESS C A PA B I L I T YA s s e s s ment Fo rm orProdu c t Proc e s s B a s is( 1 , 2 , 3 , or 4 )C hara c t e ris t icSpe c ifiedTo le ra nce C a pabili t yUtilize form In QSP 104 使用 QSP 104的表格 List all concerns if any 如果有任何擔(dān)心，逐一列出 Action is Similar to Team Feasibility Commitment 行動(dòng)事項(xiàng)與小組 可行性承諾中 的類似。 Signed by the appropriate person 有適當(dāng)人員的簽字 12. Sub Contract APQP 分包商的 APQP ? Drive same steps at all levels 在所有級(jí)別推行相同的步驟 ? We won‘t assume Tier I can manage Tier II 我們不會(huì)假定一級(jí)分包商會(huì)管理二