【正文】 acc ep ta bl e.C a p a b il it y r e q u ir e d f o r P P A P a p p r o v a lP r o d u c t io n t r ia l r u n ( P C C ) o f 3 0 0 o r m o r e p c s ?P e r f o r m s h o r t t e r m c a p a b il it y s t u d y o n m in im u m o f 3 0 s a m p le s a n d m a in t a in S P C c o n t r o l c h a r t P p k o f 1 . 7 9 o r h ig h e r a n d s t a b il it y d e m o n s t r a t e d ?P e r f o r m c a p a b il it y s t u d y o f a t le a s t 1 0 0 s a m p le sC p k o f 1 . 3 3 o r h ig h e r a n d s t a b il it y d e m o n s t r a t e d ?I m p le m e n t a n a c t io n p la n in c lu d in g c o n t r o l o f c u r r e n t p a r t s a n d t h e im p r o v e m e n t o f t h e c a p a b il it yH is t o r ic a l d a t a a v a il a b le f r o m s im il a r p r o d u c t s a n d p r o c e s s e s ?A u g m e n t o r r e p la c e s h o r t t e r m d a t a w it h lo n g t e r m r e s u lt s f r o m t h e s a m e o r s im il a r p r o c e s s e s A c c e p t s t u d yI m p le m e n t a n a c t io n p la n in c lu d in g c o n t r o l o f c u r r e n t p a r t s a n d t h e im p r o v e m e n t o f t h e c a p a b il it yI s t h e e s t im a t e d a n n u a l u s a g e 5 0 0 / y e a r ?S a t is f ie s in it ia l p r o c e s s s t u d y r e q u ir e m e n t f o r P P A P a p p r o v a lA c c e p t s t u d yS TA R TCapability requirements from PPAP manual PPAP手冊中的能力要求 23. Production Compatibility Matrix 生產(chǎn)兼容性矩陣 Ite m Na m e P art Com pl et i on Da te 1/ 1/ 20 04Dr aw i ng No . 1234567 S he et No . 1 S i gn at ureDr aw i ng Re v i s i on No . 0P r od uctP r od uct P r oces s P r oces sP r od uct S pe c i f i c at i on Cr i ti c al i ty P r oces s A s s ess m en t Cap ab i l i ty Com pa ti bi l i tyCha r acter i s ti c T ol eran c e Cl ass i f i c at i on Cap ab i l i ty Me th od Cl ass i f i c at i on Cl ass i f i c at i on Com m en ts70 m m B ore + / 1. 67 X ba r R Cap ab l e II A c c ep ta bl e10 m m f ace l en gt h + / 1. 33 X ba r R Cap ab l e II A c c ep ta bl e25 .4 m m B orr e + / 5 0. 05 X ba r R In c ap ab l e IV 10 0% i nspectOPE R A T I ON S WO R K SH EET( C la s s ific a t ion of Ch a ra c t e ris t ic s ) J o hn D o e? Used as a capability summary 用作能力總結(jié) ? Equivalent forms can be used 也可以使用同等表格 PPAPs can not be approved with undefined or inadequate capability. 對于未定義的項目以及未顯示充分能力的項目 PPAP不能得到批準。 Signed by the appropriate person 有適當(dāng)人員的簽字 12. Sub Contract APQP 分包商的 APQP ? Drive same steps at all levels 在所有級別推行相同的步驟 ? We won‘t assume Tier I can manage Tier II 我們不會假定一級分包商會管理二級分包商 ? We will review Tier II documentation with Tier I 我們會與一級分包商一道評估二級分包商的文件 – May do joint review at Tier II or Tier I 可以在二級分包商或一級分包商處進行聯(lián)合評審 – Critical for some Tier II suppliers 對于一些二級供應(yīng)商很關(guān)鍵 ? Foundries 鑄造廠 13. Team Feasibility Agreement 團隊可行性協(xié)議 ? Standard AIAG form 使用汽車行業(yè)協(xié)會組織的標準格式 ? Suppliers can use their own version 供應(yīng)商也可以使用自己的版本 ? Copy in evidence book 在證明文件中保留備份 13. Team Feasibility Agreement 團隊可行性協(xié)議 TEA M FEA SIBIL IT Y CO MMITMENTCustom er: Cum m i ns Dat e: 1/ 1/ 20 04P art Nu m be r : 1234567 P art Na m e: P artFeas ibility Con si der atio nsO ur prod uct qu al i ty p l an ni ng te am h as c on s i de r ed th e f ol l ow i ng q ue s ti on s , n ot i nt en de d to b e al l i nclu s i v e i npe r f orm i ng a f ea s i bi l i ty e v al ua ti on . T he d r aw i ng s a nd /o r s pe c i f i c at i on s p r ov i de d ha v e be en u s ed a s a b asis f or an al y z i ng th e ab i l i ty to m ee t a l l s pe c i f i ed requ i r em en ts . A l l no a nsw ers a r e s up po r te d w i th a tta c he d c om m en tsi de nt i f y i ng o ur c on c erns a nd /o r p r op osed c ha ng es to en ab l e us to m ee t t he s pe c i f i ed requ i r em en ts .Y E S NO CO NS IDE RA T IO NIs p r od uct ad eq ua te l y d ef i ne d ( ap pl i c at i on requ i r em en ts , e tc . t o en ab l ex f ea s i bi l i ty e v al ua ti on ?x Can E ng i ne eri ng P erf orm an c e S pe c i f i c at i on s b e m et a s w r i tte n?x Can p r od uct be m an uf actur ed to to l eran c es s pe c i f i ed o n draw i ng ?x Can p r od uct be m an uf actur ed w i th Cp k 39。 6. Design Review 設(shè)計評審 ? Suppliers should participate if Cummins‘ responsibility 如果是康明斯負責(zé)評審，供應(yīng)商應(yīng)參與 ? Suppliers must participate if supplier‘s responsibility 如果是供應(yīng)商負責(zé)評審，供應(yīng)商必須參與 ? Design review notes should be kept in Evidence Book 設(shè)計評審的記錄應(yīng)保存在證明文件記錄中 7. Prototype Control Plans 樣品控制計劃 ? Difficult to plete at prototype suppliers 在樣品供應(yīng)商處難以完成 ? Should be automatic at production suppliers 在產(chǎn)品供應(yīng)商處應(yīng)自動化 ? Good opportunity to experiment with requirements and processes 試驗要求與過程的好機會 ? Source release is required for all prototype parts used in VPI builds 用于 VPI裝機上的所有樣品零件都要求貨源發(fā)放 8. Drawings and Specifications 圖紙和規(guī)范 ? Drawing control is very difficult 圖紙控制非常困難 ? Ensure preliminary drawings are identified 確保初步的圖紙有進行標識 ? SQIE and Supplier DQR participation is critical 供應(yīng)商質(zhì)量改進工程師供應(yīng)商圖紙質(zhì)量回顧的參與很重要 – DQR‘s also serve as technical reviews DQR‘s還承擔(dān)技術(shù)評審的工作 – DQR‘s also serve as feasibility reviews DQR‘s還承擔(dān)可行性評審的工作 ? Make sure suppliers have all appropriate CES 確保所有的供應(yīng)商都有適當(dāng)?shù)?CES 8. Drawings and Specifications 圖紙和規(guī)范 ? Supplier graphics are being more prevalent. 供應(yīng)商圖表越來越普遍 ? The goal of the Supplier Graphics process is to: 供應(yīng)商圖表過程的目的是： – Eliminate the confusion caused when Cummins and the supplier are using their own internally created specifications for the same item. 當(dāng)康明斯與供應(yīng)商針對同一個項目使用各自內(nèi)部創(chuàng)建的規(guī)范時，消除所引起的混淆。 3. Design Responsibility設(shè)計職責(zé) Typical ID Codes 典型的ID代碼 4. DVP R 設(shè)計驗證計劃及報告