【正文】 參考對(duì)于所要求的措施的適當(dāng)程序。 3. Design Responsibility 設(shè)計(jì)職責(zé) ? Design responsibility must be: 設(shè)計(jì)職責(zé)是必須要： – Clearly defined 定義清晰 – Agreed within the team 在團(tuán)隊(duì)中達(dá)成一致 – Documented through ownership of tech profile, DVP R, ID type codes (IMS), etc. 設(shè)計(jì)職責(zé)必須通過技術(shù)文件的所有者、 DVP R, ID 類型編碼等進(jìn)行記錄 ? Design related activities, if any required by the supplier, should be municated and agreed through the RFQ process. 如果供應(yīng)商對(duì)產(chǎn)品的設(shè)計(jì)有任何要求，應(yīng)當(dāng)在報(bào)價(jià)過程中針對(duì)這些與設(shè)計(jì)相關(guān)的項(xiàng)目進(jìn)行交流并達(dá)成一致意見。 Definitions定義 ? PCC – Production Capability Certification ? PCC生產(chǎn)產(chǎn)能認(rèn)證 – Cummins run at rate process – 康明斯認(rèn)證生產(chǎn)速率過程 ? DQR – Drawing Quality Review ? DQR圖紙質(zhì)量審評(píng) – Cummins process to cross functionally review drawings for any discrepancies – 如有差異，康明斯跨功能對(duì)圖紙進(jìn)行評(píng)審的過程。 ? Suppliers should plete if supplier‘s responsibility 如果是供應(yīng)商負(fù)責(zé)設(shè)計(jì)，供應(yīng)商應(yīng)完成設(shè)計(jì)的FMEA。 Acceptable 可接受 Acceptable 可接受 Ideal 完美的 Process may be more capable then necessary, 過程能力高于必須，可能存在降低成本的機(jī)會(huì)。s th at m ee t req ui r em en ts ?x Is th ere a de qu at e c ap acit y to p r od uce p r od uct?x Doe s th e de s i gn a l l ow th e use o f e f f i c i en t m at eri al h an dl i ng te c hn i qu es?Can th e prod uct be m an uf actur ed w i th ou t i ncur r i ng a ny u nu s ua l :x Co s ts f or c ap i ta l e qu i pm en t?x Co s ts f or to ol i ng ?x A l te r na ti v e m an uf actur i ng m et ho ds?x Is s ta ti s ti c al p r oces s c on trol requ i r ed o n th e prod uct?x Is s ta ti s ti c al p r oces s c on trol p r esent l y u s ed o n s i m i l ar prod ucts ?W he r e s ta ti s ti c al p r oces s c on trol i s u s ed o n s i m i l ar prod ucts :x A r e th e proc ess es i n c on trol a nd s ta bl e?x A r e Cpk 39。 ? Any discrepancies must be approved by engineering. 如有任何偏差需要得到工程師的批準(zhǔn)。 ? SQIE reviews and signs ROC 供應(yīng)商質(zhì)量改進(jìn)工程師進(jìn)行審核以及簽署符合性報(bào)告。 Signed by the appropriate person 有適當(dāng)人員的簽字 12. Sub Contract APQP 分包商的 APQP ? Drive same steps at all levels 在所有級(jí)別推行相同的步驟 ? We won‘t assume Tier I can manage Tier II 我們不會(huì)假定一級(jí)分包商會(huì)管理二級(jí)分包商 ? We will review Tier II documentation with Tier I 我們會(huì)與一級(jí)分包商一道評(píng)估二級(jí)分包商的文件 – May do joint review at Tier II or Tier I 可以在二級(jí)分包商或一級(jí)分包商處進(jìn)行聯(lián)合評(píng)審 – Critical for some Tier II suppliers 對(duì)于一些二級(jí)供應(yīng)商很關(guān)鍵 ? Foundries 鑄造廠 13. Team Feasibility Agreement 團(tuán)隊(duì)可行性協(xié)議 ? Standard AIAG form 使用汽車行業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)組織的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)格式 ? Suppliers can use their own version 供應(yīng)商也可以使用自己的版本 ? Copy in evidence book 在證明文件中保留備份 13. Team Feasibility Agreement 團(tuán)隊(duì)可行性協(xié)議 TEA M FEA SIBIL IT Y CO MMITMENTCustom er: Cum m i ns Dat e: 1/ 1/ 20 04P art Nu m be r : 1234567 P art Na m e: P artFeas ibility Con si der atio nsO ur prod uct qu al i ty p l an ni ng te am h as c on s i de r ed th e f ol l ow i ng q ue s ti on s , n ot i nt en de d to b e al l i nclu s i v e i npe r f orm i ng a f ea s i bi l i ty e v al ua ti on . T he d r aw i ng s a nd /o r s pe c i f i c at i on s p r ov i de d ha v e be en u s ed a s a b asis f or an al y z i ng th e ab i l i ty to m ee t a l l s pe c i f i ed requ i r em en ts . A l l no a nsw ers a r e s up po r te d w i th a tta c he d c om m en tsi de nt i f y i ng o ur c on c erns a nd /o r p r op osed c ha ng es to en ab l e us to m ee t t he s pe c i f i ed requ i r em en ts .Y E S NO CO NS IDE RA T IO NIs p r od uct ad eq ua te l y d ef i ne d ( ap pl i c at i on requ i r em en ts , e tc . t o en ab l ex f ea s i bi l i ty e v al ua ti on ?x Can E ng i ne eri ng P erf orm an c e S pe c i f i c at i on s b e m et a s w r i tte n?x Can p r od uct be m an uf actur ed to to l eran c es s pe c i f i ed o n draw i ng ?x Can p r od uct be m an uf actur ed w i th Cp k 39。 opportunity for cost savings may exist. 24. Production Control Plans 量產(chǎn)控制計(jì)劃 ? Industry standard 行業(yè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn) ? Ensure appropriate SPC is in place and documented for majors and criticals 確保對(duì)主要和關(guān)鍵特性有進(jìn)行適當(dāng)?shù)?SPC統(tǒng)計(jì)并有文件記錄 – Should support on demand Cpk status inquiries 應(yīng)該對(duì) Cpk狀態(tài)查詢的需要提供支持 – Must support PUR 02040701 必須支持 PUR 02040701 CO NT RO L P LA N P r o to typ e ( ) P r e l a u n ch ( ) P r o d u cti o n ( x ) K e y Con ta ct/ P h o n e D a te ( Or i g .) D a te ( R e v.)C o n tr o l P l a n Num b e r P a r t N u m b e r / L a te st Cha n g e L e vel C o r e T e a m C u sto m e r E n g i n e e r i n g A p p r o val / D a te ( If Req 39。 6. Design Review 設(shè)計(jì)評(píng)審 ? Suppliers should participate if Cummins‘ responsibility 如果是康明斯負(fù)責(zé)評(píng)審，供應(yīng)商應(yīng)參與 ? Suppliers must participate if supplier‘s responsibility 如果是供應(yīng)商負(fù)責(zé)評(píng)審，供應(yīng)商必須參與 ? Design review notes should be kept in Evidence Book 設(shè)計(jì)評(píng)審的記錄應(yīng)保存在證明文件記錄中 7. Prototype Control Plans 樣品控制計(jì)劃 ? Difficult to plete at prototype suppliers 在樣品供應(yīng)商處難以完成 ? Should be automatic at production suppliers 在產(chǎn)品供應(yīng)商處應(yīng)自動(dòng)化 ? Good opportunity to experiment with requirements and processes 試驗(yàn)要求與過程的好機(jī)會(huì) ? Source release is required for all prototype parts used in VPI builds 用于 VPI裝機(jī)上的所有樣品零件都要求貨源發(fā)放 8. Drawings and Specifications 圖紙和規(guī)范 ? Drawing control is very difficult 圖紙控制非常困難 ? Ensure preliminary drawings are identified 確保初步的圖紙有進(jìn)行標(biāo)識(shí) ? SQIE and Supplier DQR participation is critical 供應(yīng)商質(zhì)量改進(jìn)工程師供應(yīng)商圖紙質(zhì)量回顧的參與很重要 – DQR‘s also serve as technical reviews DQR‘s還承擔(dān)技術(shù)評(píng)審的工作 – DQR‘s also serve as feasibility reviews DQR‘s還承擔(dān)可行性評(píng)審的工作 ? Make sure suppliers have all appropriate CES 確保所有的供應(yīng)商都有適當(dāng)?shù)?CES 8. Drawings and Specifications 圖紙和規(guī)范 ? Supplier graphics are being more prevalent. 供應(yīng)商圖表越來越普遍 ? The goal of the Supplier Graphics process is to: 供應(yīng)商圖表過程的目的是： – Eliminate the confusion caused when Cummins and the supplier are using their own internally created specifications for the same item. 當(dāng)康明斯與供應(yīng)商針對(duì)同一個(gè)項(xiàng)目使用各自內(nèi)部創(chuàng)建的規(guī)范時(shí)，消除所引起的混淆。 ? MQV – Manufacturing Quality Verification ? MQV制造質(zhì)量證明 – Cummins process to