【正文】 參考對于所要求的措施的適當程序。 3. Design Responsibility 設計職責 ? Design responsibility must be: 設計職責是必須要： – Clearly defined 定義清晰 – Agreed within the team 在團隊中達成一致 – Documented through ownership of tech profile, DVP R, ID type codes (IMS), etc. 設計職責必須通過技術文件的所有者、 DVP R, ID 類型編碼等進行記錄 ? Design related activities, if any required by the supplier, should be municated and agreed through the RFQ process. 如果供應商對產品的設計有任何要求，應當在報價過程中針對這些與設計相關的項目進行交流并達成一致意見。 Definitions定義 ? PCC – Production Capability Certification ? PCC生產產能認證 – Cummins run at rate process – 康明斯認證生產速率過程 ? DQR – Drawing Quality Review ? DQR圖紙質量審評 – Cummins process to cross functionally review drawings for any discrepancies – 如有差異，康明斯跨功能對圖紙進行評審的過程。 ? Suppliers should plete if supplier‘s responsibility 如果是供應商負責設計，供應商應完成設計的FMEA。 Acceptable 可接受 Acceptable 可接受 Ideal 完美的 Process may be more capable then necessary, 過程能力高于必須，可能存在降低成本的機會。s th at m ee t req ui r em en ts ?x Is th ere a de qu at e c ap acit y to p r od uce p r od uct?x Doe s th e de s i gn a l l ow th e use o f e f f i c i en t m at eri al h an dl i ng te c hn i qu es?Can th e prod uct be m an uf actur ed w i th ou t i ncur r i ng a ny u nu s ua l :x Co s ts f or c ap i ta l e qu i pm en t?x Co s ts f or to ol i ng ?x A l te r na ti v e m an uf actur i ng m et ho ds?x Is s ta ti s ti c al p r oces s c on trol requ i r ed o n th e prod uct?x Is s ta ti s ti c al p r oces s c on trol p r esent l y u s ed o n s i m i l ar prod ucts ?W he r e s ta ti s ti c al p r oces s c on trol i s u s ed o n s i m i l ar prod ucts :x A r e th e proc ess es i n c on trol a nd s ta bl e?x A r e Cpk 39。 ? Any discrepancies must be approved by engineering. 如有任何偏差需要得到工程師的批準。 ? SQIE reviews and signs ROC 供應商質量改進工程師進行審核以及簽署符合性報告。 Signed by the appropriate person 有適當人員的簽字 12. Sub Contract APQP 分包商的 APQP ? Drive same steps at all levels 在所有級別推行相同的步驟 ? We won‘t assume Tier I can manage Tier II 我們不會假定一級分包商會管理二級分包商 ? We will review Tier II documentation with Tier I 我們會與一級分包商一道評估二級分包商的文件 – May do joint review at Tier II or Tier I 可以在二級分包商或一級分包商處進行聯(lián)合評審 – Critical for some Tier II suppliers 對于一些二級供應商很關鍵 ? Foundries 鑄造廠 13. Team Feasibility Agreement 團隊可行性協(xié)議 ? Standard AIAG form 使用汽車行業(yè)協(xié)會組織的標準格式 ? Suppliers can use their own version 供應商也可以使用自己的版本 ? Copy in evidence book 在證明文件中保留備份 13. Team Feasibility Agreement 團隊可行性協(xié)議 TEA M FEA SIBIL IT Y CO MMITMENTCustom er: Cum m i ns Dat e: 1/ 1/ 20 04P art Nu m be r : 1234567 P art Na m e: P artFeas ibility Con si der atio nsO ur prod uct qu al i ty p l an ni ng te am h as c on s i de r ed th e f ol l ow i ng q ue s ti on s , n ot i nt en de d to b e al l i nclu s i v e i npe r f orm i ng a f ea s i bi l i ty e v al ua ti on . T he d r aw i ng s a nd /o r s pe c i f i c at i on s p r ov i de d ha v e be en u s ed a s a b asis f or an al y z i ng th e ab i l i ty to m ee t a l l s pe c i f i ed requ i r em en ts . A l l no a nsw ers a r e s up po r te d w i th a tta c he d c om m en tsi de nt i f y i ng o ur c on c erns a nd /o r p r op osed c ha ng es to en ab l e us to m ee t t he s pe c i f i ed requ i r em en ts .Y E S NO CO NS IDE RA T IO NIs p r od uct ad eq ua te l y d ef i ne d ( ap pl i c at i on requ i r em en ts , e tc . t o en ab l ex f ea s i bi l i ty e v al ua ti on ?x Can E ng i ne eri ng P erf orm an c e S pe c i f i c at i on s b e m et a s w r i tte n?x Can p r od uct be m an uf actur ed to to l eran c es s pe c i f i ed o n draw i ng ?x Can p r od uct be m an uf actur ed w i th Cp k 39。 opportunity for cost savings may exist. 24. Production Control Plans 量產控制計劃 ? Industry standard 行業(yè)標準 ? Ensure appropriate SPC is in place and documented for majors and criticals 確保對主要和關鍵特性有進行適當?shù)?SPC統(tǒng)計并有文件記錄 – Should support on demand Cpk status inquiries 應該對 Cpk狀態(tài)查詢的需要提供支持 – Must support PUR 02040701 必須支持 PUR 02040701 CO NT RO L P LA N P r o to typ e ( ) P r e l a u n ch ( ) P r o d u cti o n ( x ) K e y Con ta ct/ P h o n e D a te ( Or i g .) D a te ( R e v.)C o n tr o l P l a n Num b e r P a r t N u m b e r / L a te st Cha n g e L e vel C o r e T e a m C u sto m e r E n g i n e e r i n g A p p r o val / D a te ( If Req 39。 6. Design Review 設計評審 ? Suppliers should participate if Cummins‘ responsibility 如果是康明斯負責評審，供應商應參與 ? Suppliers must participate if supplier‘s responsibility 如果是供應商負責評審，供應商必須參與 ? Design review notes should be kept in Evidence Book 設計評審的記錄應保存在證明文件記錄中 7. Prototype Control Plans 樣品控制計劃 ? Difficult to plete at prototype suppliers 在樣品供應商處難以完成 ? Should be automatic at production suppliers 在產品供應商處應自動化 ? Good opportunity to experiment with requirements and processes 試驗要求與過程的好機會 ? Source release is required for all prototype parts used in VPI builds 用于 VPI裝機上的所有樣品零件都要求貨源發(fā)放 8. Drawings and Specifications 圖紙和規(guī)范 ? Drawing control is very difficult 圖紙控制非常困難 ? Ensure preliminary drawings are identified 確保初步的圖紙有進行標識 ? SQIE and Supplier DQR participation is critical 供應商質量改進工程師供應商圖紙質量回顧的參與很重要 – DQR‘s also serve as technical reviews DQR‘s還承擔技術評審的工作 – DQR‘s also serve as feasibility reviews DQR‘s還承擔可行性評審的工作 ? Make sure suppliers have all appropriate CES 確保所有的供應商都有適當?shù)?CES 8. Drawings and Specifications 圖紙和規(guī)范 ? Supplier graphics are being more prevalent. 供應商圖表越來越普遍 ? The goal of the Supplier Graphics process is to: 供應商圖表過程的目的是： – Eliminate the confusion caused when Cummins and the supplier are using their own internally created specifications for the same item. 當康明斯與供應商針對同一個項目使用各自內部創(chuàng)建的規(guī)范時，消除所引起的混淆。 ? MQV – Manufacturing Quality Verification ? MQV制造質量證明 – Cummins process to