【正文】 Production生產(chǎn)部 QUALITY SYSTEMS SURVEY REPORT質(zhì)量系統(tǒng)調(diào)查報(bào)告COMPANY/DIVISION LOCATION 公司/部門 地址 OPERATIONS/PLANT jianxin PHONE 業(yè)務(wù)/工廠經(jīng)理 電話COMPANY QUALITY DEPARTMENT CONTACT品管部門聯(lián)絡(luò)人SURVEYED BY調(diào)查人TYPE OF BUSINESS：業(yè)務(wù)種類DATE日期AUDIT RESULTS：稽核結(jié)果UnacceptableACCEPTABLE可接受CONDITIONALLYACCEPTABLE有條件接受NOTACCEPTABLE不可接受RANGE總分RATING得分RANGE總分RATING得分RANGE總分RATING得分ⅠQuality Organization品管組織12161011090ⅡTraining ＆Communication 培訓(xùn)與溝通101389070ⅢDocument and Spec Control 文件控制1115910080ⅣInspection Process 檢驗(yàn)過程243319230180ⅤControl of Measurement＆Test Equipment 測量試驗(yàn)設(shè)備的控制152112140110Ⅵ Purchased Materal 物料采購152011130100Ⅶ Process Control 過程控制283922270210ⅧQuality System 質(zhì)量體系182515170140ⅨContract Review 合同評審342010ⅩDesign Control 設(shè)計(jì)控制101389070ⅪControl of Customer Supplied Product客戶提供產(chǎn)品的控制23100ⅫControl of Quality Records 質(zhì)量記錄的控制453020ⅩⅢHanding，Storage，Packaging and Delivery搬運(yùn)，儲存，包裝和交付34020RATING OF TOTAL SYSTEM 系統(tǒng)總得分： 0%Assessed Department 受審核部門Contact Person被審核人Position 職位Remark 備注12345678 Comment/評論 Rating/得分： Result/結(jié)果；Assessor/評審人：QUALITY SYSTEMS SURVER SCORE SHEET質(zhì) 量 系 統(tǒng) 調(diào) 查 評 分 表QUALITY SUB SYSTEMS： 品管系統(tǒng)分組TOTALPOSSIBLE最高分SCORE得分RATING 等級Ⅰ Quality Organization 品管組織160Not Acceptable 不可接受Ⅱ Training＆Communication培訓(xùn)與溝通130Not Acceptable 不可接受Ⅲ Document and Spec Control 文件控制150Not Acceptable 不可接受Ⅳ Inspection Process 檢驗(yàn)過程330Not Acceptable 不可接受ⅤControl of Measurement ＆Test Equipment 測量試驗(yàn)設(shè)備的控制210Not Acceptable 不可接受Ⅵ Purchased Materal 物料采購200Not Acceptable 不可接受Ⅶ Process Control過程控制390Not Acceptable 不可接受Ⅷ Quality System 質(zhì)量體系250Not Acceptable 不可接受Ⅸ Contract Review 合同評審40Not Acceptable 不可接受Ⅹ Design Control 設(shè)計(jì)控制130Not Acceptable 不可接受Ⅺ Control of Customer Supplied Product客戶提供產(chǎn)品的控制30Not Acceptable 不可接受Ⅻ Control of Quality Records 質(zhì)量記錄的控制50Not Acceptable 不可接受ⅩⅢ Handing，Storage，Packaging and Delivery搬運(yùn)，儲存，包裝和交付60Not Acceptable 不可接受TOTAL總分2100 RATING % NOTES a question is nonapplicable for a given plant ,indicate as (N/A)and deduct those question points from total possible in determining score for that subsystem. Quality System Survey Report includes 13 rating of at least 70%,none of subsystems rated”Not acceptable” is needed for a system to be rated “Qualified”.A rating of at least 55%,none of subsystems rated”Not acceptable” is required for a system to be rated “Conditional Acceptable”備注：，標(biāo)明N/A并把該問題的分?jǐn)?shù)從總分里減去。 。多謝！Supplier Corrective Action Requisition供應(yīng)商糾正預(yù)防措施Problems 問題點(diǎn) Remendations 建議QUALITY ORGANIZATION Score 得分：0品管組織 Total Possible 最高分：16 the organization at the corporate or local level have a Quality Manual,including specific quality objectives that reflect management’s mitment to quality? 組織是否有公司級的質(zhì)量手冊，其中包含管理層承諾的質(zhì)量目標(biāo)？Considerations 考慮因素Quality manual satisfies ISO9000 requirements.質(zhì)量手冊符合ISO9000的要求 Quality manual is controlled and current via revisions and is utilized質(zhì)量手冊受控并為最新版Scoring：得分0 Manual does not exist 沒有手冊 1. Informal quality procedures are available 有非正式的手冊 2. Quality manual is in planning stage。但目前遵守品管程序3. A quality manual is available,focuses primarily on inspection methods 有質(zhì)量手冊，但側(cè)重與檢驗(yàn)方法 4. A quality manual is available ,but lacks some elements of a preventative system. 有質(zhì)量手冊，但在預(yù)防系統(tǒng)方面缺乏某些因素 5. A prehensive manual is available that includes advance quality improvement methodsand clearly defines pany’s goals and preventative philosophy. 有完善的質(zhì)量手冊，包含的先進(jìn)的品質(zhì)改進(jìn)方法和清楚描述了公司目標(biāo)和預(yù)防策略Remarks 備注：2. Is the quality function adequately atsffed and supported for the implementation and maintenance of the documented quality system?品管是否有足夠的人力和支持可以運(yùn)行和維護(hù)質(zhì)量系統(tǒng)？Considerations 考慮因素Independent quality function reports at the appropriate arganizational level. 在適當(dāng)?shù)慕M織水平上有獨(dú)立的質(zhì)量報(bào)告Quality function includes professional engineering personnel who focus on application of preventative techniques. 有專業(yè)的工程師致力于預(yù)防技術(shù)的應(yīng)用Scoring: 得分 0 No Quality function 沒有質(zhì)量功能1 Part time or insufficiently staffed quality function. 有兼職的或人員不足2 Dedicated,adequately staffed,quality function.. 專職的和充足的人員Remarks 備注：3. Are quality responsibilities adequately defined and documented? 質(zhì)量職職是否被完整描述并且文件化？Considerations 考慮因素： Organization charts exist and are controlled via revisions.有組織圖并且受控為最新版Job descriptions are established ,reviewed,and controlled via revisions.有職責(zé)描述并受控為最新版Scoring:得分 0 Quality responsibilities are not defined 沒有定義質(zhì)量職責(zé) 1 Quality responsibilities are generally defined,but lack formality and control 有定義質(zhì)量職責(zé)，但非正式和沒有受控 2 Quality responsibilities are formally defined in controlled procedures and/or quality process flow chart 在受控的質(zhì)量程序或品