【正文】 L)policy, ensure that that reliability growth curves are stated in a series of intermediate goals and tracked through fully 。E requested information on these instances, the construction of reliability growth curve was to ply with a paper policy, rather than to reflect systems engineering respondents indicated that the reliability requirements were not achievable, because they were based on faulty modeling assumptions or they were unrealistically high pared to similar , some respondents mented that there was insufficient testing in OT to evaluate the reliability requirement or the reliability growth model inputs were not based on realistic with the result of previous surveys, survey responses collected in 2013 provide no evidence of improvement in the percentage of programs that met their RAM entrance or exit to other types of OT, FOTamp。E or FOTamp。E or had an OT in FY TEMP is the overarching document that describes the program’s test plan [3]. Survey Analysis ApproachAnalysis of each survey question considered how the responses varied by time by paring responses in the most recent survey to the earlier surveys by TEMP survey entries between surveys were analysis also considered differences by lead service including the Army, Navy, and Air Force(Marine Corps responses were grouped with the Navy), and by acquisition analysis binned the responses using the following TEMP date categories to maintain consistency with the methodology used in previous survey analyses: ?Dated before July 2008, prior to approval of a key DoD reliability policy(75 responses)?Dated between June 2008 and October 2010(81 responses)?Dated in FY 2011(57 responses)?Dated in FY 2012 or FY2013 13(52 responses).Where appropriate, contingency tables were used to record and analyze the relationship between two or more categorical allowed the determination of whether the observed results were statistically Population of Survey ResponsesIDA analysts pleted 97 responses in the most recent reliability survey conducted in the 97 responses, 52 were for programs that had an FY 2012 or 2013 TEMP, 66 were for programs that had an FY 2012 OT, and 7 were for programs that did not have an FY 2012 or 2013 TEMP or the 66 programs with an FY 2012 OT, 28 also had an FY 2012 or 2013 2 shows the breakdown of responses by acquisition phase, lead Service, and test 63 percent of systems represented by survey responses were past their Initial Operational Test(IOT).SURVEY RESULTSOverall results, based on analysis of survey responses and user ments, reinforce the understanding that systems with a robust reliability growth program are more likely to reach reliability particular, analysis results revealed the importance of establishing RAM entrance criteria and intermediate goals that are linked to the reliability growth shown in Table 3, programs that establish and meet their RAM entrance criteria are more likely to demonstrate reliability at or above the required value during of effective RAM entrance criteria include(1)demonstrating, in the last DT event before the IOTamp。E reports to congress suggest that despite establishment over the years of policies intended to encourage development of more reliable systems, DoD system reliability has not 1997 to 2013, only 56 percent of the systems that underwent an OT met or exceeded their reliability threshold requirements [2].Further analysis suggests there has been no improvement in the fraction of programs meeting their reliability requirements over better understand these trends, DOTamp。E oversees major DoD acquisition programs to ensure OTamp。E is the principal staff assistant and senior advisor to the Secretary of Defense on operational test and evaluation(OTamp。E), the Institute for Defense Analyses(IDA)has conducted annual reliability surveys of DoD programs under DOTamp。第四篇：英語論文翻譯Reliability Survey of Military Acquisition Systems Jonathan , ., Institute for Defense Analyses Matthew , ., Institute for Defense Analyses Michael , Institute for Defense AnalysesKey Words: Survey, Department of Defense, Military, ReliabilitySUMMARY amp。瑞恩他們有用的評論和在本文早期版本的一個建議表示感謝。然而, 為每個特定的目的地選擇合適的和準確的形象無疑是旅游信息搜索后續(xù)階段的一個至關(guān)重要的元素。增強目的地文化特征主要提供海水—沙灘—陽光，旅游景點將允許一個分化的旅游供給和吸引新的市場領(lǐng)域。因此,采用古板的圖片可能會導致創(chuàng)建一個困惑或司空見慣的最初的目的地形象的形成。視覺圖片具體創(chuàng)建一個一致的形象,尤其是當目的地是未知的和個人并不熟悉的地方。在許多情況下,文化的局限性和熟悉性與地方部分上的本地旅游管理人員可以促進本地資源成為成功的旅游發(fā)展構(gòu)成一個障礙。然后,因為圖片僅代表宣傳小冊子和網(wǎng)站復(fù)雜結(jié)構(gòu)的一個元素,未來的研究可以調(diào)查旅游手冊其他可視化方面的認知, 從情感和認知點看像設(shè)計和顏色。這個案例旅游目的地允許結(jié)果只將參與者和用作研究的刺激類型泛化。然而,未來的調(diào)查應(yīng)該被引入更大的和廣義樣品。從方法論的角度來看,這項研究只涉及意大利課題和研究僅限于相同的旅游目的地兩類圖片的分析。事實上,邏輯回歸分析只包含了一些變量。然而,我們知道,目前的研究結(jié)果是不自由的的局限性。出于這個原因,我們強調(diào)涉及游客選擇作為宣傳目的圖片的重要性。但他們通常使用的促銷的觀點建設(shè)模式化目的地的形象,它隱藏當?shù)仄渌臐摿臀?。第一次潛在游客可能會在?shù)以百計的宣傳冊看到第一個類別圖片和不被鼓勵深化知識目的地。我們認為,擬議的案例旅游目的地在和許多其他幾個代表特色的旅游吸引物旅游地但支持傳統(tǒng)大量旅游被忽視有共同點(例如,陽光和海洋旅游)。第二個類別中的圖片目前不用于宣傳目的。圖片也應(yīng)該有助于開發(fā)有競爭力和可持續(xù)的旅游目的地,通過提供信息在多元化的潛力地方。圖片之間的關(guān)系、情感、動機代表一個重要的因素,旨在滿足游客的需求和定義一個投資組合的新旅游景點(作者)。在目前的研究中對案例旅游的目的地這似乎是來說尤其如此。同樣,雖然該研究沒有證明直接關(guān)系,很明顯,通過視覺刺激來評價性向目的地過程是情緒和動機兩個相關(guān)的和基本的方面。在這項研究中很明顯如果和第二類別圖片有關(guān)，動機在決策該過程中有不同影響。然而,冪值表明,受試者更有動力訪問用于促進阿曼泰阿第二個類別中的的地方比目前的圖片。支出的空閑時間的影響渴望參觀的地方所倡導的第二個類別的圖片。從勵志的觀點,受試者被第二個類別圖片所吸引中的原因不同。有幾個領(lǐng)域也已經(jīng)研究了在目的地形象,但在旅游領(lǐng)域很少有系統(tǒng)的研究。如上所述,圖片用于促銷目標是肯定的工具,一個積極的影響旅游目的地精神建設(shè)(作者),它們在旅游決策過程可以發(fā)揮決定性的作用。第二個類別的圖片變化引起游客行為的變化, 相比第一類他們更感興趣的選擇這些。相反,該圖片的第二個類別引發(fā)了旅游思想更多的情緒激動。邏輯回歸分析結(jié)果表明這兩個類別圖片有顯著的差異。旅游動機調(diào)查考慮皮爾斯的模型(2005)。因此,主要的研究問題是:兩類圖片是如何影響游客的情感和動機評估？兩不同類別圖片影響潛在顧客的決策過程嗎？本研究的案例旅游的目的地是阿曼泰阿南部意大利),其中在尤其是以其古老的城鎮(zhèn)卡拉布里亞最出名的度假勝地。正如科特勒和格特納(2002)認為,刻板的圖片是一個極度簡化的現(xiàn)實,而這些通常提供很少的旅游目的地的信息。盡管幾項研究強調(diào)目的地形象在認知和情感的過程的影響,沒有系統(tǒng)調(diào)查研究分析作為促銷目的形象的選擇過程。結(jié)論本研究為旅游作為一個信息來源以促進案例旅游目的地阿曼泰阿評估了情感、動機和形象決策處理。結(jié)果有關(guān)阿曼泰阿古鎮(zhèn)的圖片目前沒有用作宣傳目的,這證明他們可以代表新的感知刺激并能顯著地提高旅游業(yè)的潛力。最主要的證據(jù)在于,第二個類別圖片關(guān)聯(lián)的動機更多的積極影響游客的決定這個事實。然而, 第一類圖片的情感反應(yīng)與第二類相比，隱含低水平的情感參與。圖片與影響目的地形成和隨之而來游客最終決定的動機有關(guān)。指數(shù)值所顯示的那樣,結(jié)果還表明, 跟第二個類別圖片相關(guān)的動機更有可能影響游客像度假和發(fā)這些地方照片的可能性?？释麉⒂^第一個類別地方的的大部分是通過他們的歷史魅力影響而支出的空閑時間主要影響了渴望第二個類別參觀的地方。卡方測試的顯示,所有三個模型顯著提高預(yù)測的結(jié)果(表8)。指數(shù)所顯示的那樣的預(yù)言,每增加一單位建議價值，(見表7)。%的事件被正確分類的,所以模型具有較好的預(yù)測精度。這明顯預(yù)示受試者愿意在第二類圖片展示的地方度假。%,這是一個令人滿意的百分比。提出地方支出的空閑時間顯著預(yù)測去參觀它們的可能性。邏輯回歸分析是進行檢查動機機制關(guān)于來參觀的地方,來該地度假和發(fā)