【正文】 interests, the wellbeing of children is the first, the rights of parents, ho。s way of life and idea of children in the family of independent personality, independent status, emphasizing the parents for the child39。s decisive factor, because this risk does not exist, so the decision unconstitutional on equal protection provisions, the Florida court only according to ethnic factors judgment is not allowed. 4. Religion And the effect of race on the custody case similarity, the religious beliefs as a child custody ruling basis is in violation of the Supreme Court noted family courts can consider parental religious beliefs, in order to protect the best interests of their children, but the Federal Constitution prohibits the court from religion to consider different religious superiority or show some , the United States Court in relation with religion child custody problems mainly adhere to this principle: the marital relationship continues to exist during both parents agreed to their religious beliefs, after divorce, both for the children of religious beliefs have agreement, from protocol, there is no agreement or protocol is not consistent, the guardianship parents a decision. PART 4 Inspiration From the United States after the divorce custody system The author thinks, the United States of America39。s age, maturity and children on the grounds of the Ayushu and West Virginia law, as long as parents for the guardian, minors over the age of 14 have the option of parents where the guardian absolute rights, unless the child is chosen by the parents for custody of the children, or they will play a decisive role in the choice Rhode Island is provided, at the age of 14 as the minimum age for children to choose the guardian, children choice as the court decision reference factor. 3. Race Usually, the court before the judgment in making care must take into full consideration the interests of all children and related factors, although not as a separate race the decisive factors in parents of different races, but the custody case, race and 14 indeed identify children guardianship United States Supreme Court in the case of points out, as a child custody decisions races can39。s best interests standard is usually made by judges to make subjective judgments, which parents can take better care of protecting children also by the fact, there are quite a number of parents in the divorce can better cooperation, the result makes children in between parents, parents weapons of war or punching , disputes the war environment, of course, is not conducive to the healthy growth of scholars also points out further, suppose the mon care is harmful, a considerable number of joint physical custody cases is essentially the final result is the conflict between the parents, joint custody only when both parents were able to cooperate with each other in order to better operation。Children already amounted to proceed independently of mean age, voluntary and non primary care people living together。 (3) both parents work full time for children, is responsible for the arrangement of daily life doctor, school, and other things for their children, and to provide advice and emotional support for the , in the following cases, the court may sentence by a primary care who exercised custody: (1) primary care are not suitable for or to take care of children。t reach the child custody agreement, court shall determine by in the family assume primary care and parenting responsibility for the party to exercise guardianship, unless he is more suitable for the care of 2, the socalled family life take the primary care and parenting responsibilities of a parent refers to: (1) stay at home fulltime child care party。 (8) child education basic rules of behaviour, such as daily behavior, restroom training。 (6) arranged to alternative care, such as go to kindergarten, employment insurance Tom。 (4) medical care, including care and go to the hospital to see a doctor after school。 (2), take a shower, clean clothes。s love in their childhood is irreplaceable,The child for maternal love requires more than , if cannot prove that mother is harmful to children wellbeing, should by the mother principle was long used in the 1970, the laws of the state of California is also provided, in other condition of considerable circumstances, by the mother custody of young children to exercise, when children need to attend school or prepare to go out to work, business, it should be exercised by father 1973, the Pennsylvania high court still think young children best interests is given by mothers to take care the court is that young children, by the mother care for gender discrimination, was unconstitutional, because in a child custody proceedings, only with sex as the division standard, but not to consider the best interests of their children, without any side based on gender difference should be presumed to side more than the best interest of the , most of the court rejected the use of this theory, on the contrary, considered in deciding where children with life, according to the theory of equality of men and women, regardless of their age, the father and mother in custody issues are no sex predominance. 2. Parents have custody Custody disputes sometimes occurred in the child39。Once the initial feelings of isolation and its object, may have a mood disorder, and loss and personality order to meet the child39。 (4) child in family, school and social adaptability。 (3) children with one or both parents, siblings, and other important implications for the best interests of the child39。s family in the provisions of the act to determine parental custody according to whether be helpful for children best interests the United States federal law and state law in the provisions of the best inter