【正文】
tus are interconnected. But marriage could not only depend on the property and the social status. The happy marriage should be based on the mutual respect, mutual admiration. She objects the marriage for money and opposes the thoughtless marriage, but stresses the importance of emotional factors. Conclusion By description and discussion of the four marriages in the novel, we can see that Austen fully expresses her views on love and marriage only by appreciating the marriage founded on the basis of mutual understanding and true love, but also by satirizing the marriage founded on the basis of origin and desire. The marriage based on social position and money can’t bring happy life. Aimless marriage and love are impracticable. Austen’s views on marriage and love are also suitable for our real social. We youth should make right marriage and love views to orient our lives . Acknowledgements Firstly, I must send my most sincere respect and thanks to my supervisor Miss. Cui Just under her supervision, my graduation paper can be successfully pleted. At the same time, I should give my thanks to my neighboring classmates. They provided me much useful material and information. Their help plays another vital role in the process of my graduation paper pleting work. At last, I give the most heartfelt thanks to all my teachers, friends and the municipal departments for their great help. I hope they all get bright future . Bibliography [1], Irony In Pride and prejudice. HuZhou: Journal of HuZhou Teachers Collage. 2021. [2]HeShenYing, A Perfect Marriage Wants True love as well as Money. Yuxi: Journal of YuXi Teacher [3]Rubinstein Ante, 1967 Great Tradition in English Literature from Shakespeare to Austen, Monthly Review Press [4]Thornley G. C. and Roberts Gwyh, An Outline of English Literature, Longman World Publishing Corporation, 1984. [5]Sampson Gee, The Concise Cambridge History of English Literature, Cambridge Universit 1988 [6] 常耀信 . 英國(guó)文學(xué)簡(jiǎn)史 [M]. 南開(kāi)大學(xué)出版社 , 2021. [7] 簡(jiǎn) ?奧斯汀,傲慢與偏見(jiàn) [M],內(nèi)蒙古:內(nèi)蒙古人民出版社, 2021 [8] 李銀河,女性權(quán)力的崛起 [M],北京:中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)出版社, 1997. [9] 曼素思,綴珍錄 ——十八世紀(jì)及其前后的中國(guó)婦女 [M],江蘇:江蘇人民出版社 2021年1月第1版 [10] 王守仁 . 英國(guó)文學(xué)選讀 [M] 北京:高等教育出版社 2021 [11] 王佐良 . 英國(guó)文學(xué)論文集 [M]. 沈陽(yáng):北方文藝出版社, 1984. [12] 徐曉東 . 英文觀止 (上下冊(cè) )[M].北京:世界圖書(shū)出版公司北京公司, 2021. [13] 張中載 . 當(dāng)代英國(guó)文學(xué)論文集 [M]. 遼寧:外語(yǔ)教學(xué)與研究出版社, 1996. [14] 朱 虹(編) . 英國(guó)小說(shuō)的黃金時(shí)代 [M], 北京:中國(guó)社會(huì) 科學(xué)出版社 1997 [15] 朱 虹(編) .奧斯丁研究 [M], 北京:中國(guó)文聯(lián)出版公司 1985 中美文化視野中對(duì)個(gè)人主義的認(rèn)同差異 The Different Recognitions Towards Individualism Between Chinese and American Culture Abstract The paper represents a different recognition between Chinese and American people towards individualism. American people regard individualism as “individuality”, while Chinese people think individualism is equivalent to “selfishness”. Different culture backgrounds between China and America result in the different recognitions toward individualism. As a social product and a phenomenon of the culture, right or wrong should not be branded with individualism and as a Marxist, an objective and dialectical method should be used to judge individualism. Only when Chinese people acknowledge individualism in a right, can they remove their misunderstanding towards individualism and the wrong exercise of it. Then after they realize individualism in a right way, they could take advantage of it in the construction of Chinese society and the development of themselves. Key Words Individualism。 cultural phenomenon。 the positive aspect。 social product 摘 要 論文闡釋了個(gè)人主義在中美兩國(guó)人民的認(rèn)識(shí)中存在的差異,美國(guó)人認(rèn)為個(gè)人主義是一種 “個(gè)性 ”,而中國(guó)人則認(rèn)為它代表的就是 “自私 ”。產(chǎn)生這種差異的根本原因就在于中美兩國(guó)擁有不同的文化背景。作為一個(gè)社會(huì)發(fā)展的產(chǎn)物和一種文化現(xiàn)象,個(gè)人主義不應(yīng)該用對(duì)或是錯(cuò)來(lái)衡量,而作為馬克思主義者,就更加應(yīng)該客 觀、公正的看待從不同文化當(dāng)中衍生出來(lái)的東西。中國(guó)人要正確認(rèn)識(shí)個(gè)人主義必須從美國(guó)文化當(dāng)中理解個(gè)人主義。只有真正認(rèn)識(shí)、理解了個(gè)人主義,才能從根本上消除中國(guó)人對(duì)個(gè)人主義產(chǎn)生的誤讀以及對(duì)個(gè)人主義錯(cuò)誤的運(yùn)用。在此之后,也就可以將個(gè)人主義中積極合理的一面應(yīng)用到中國(guó)社會(huì)的發(fā)展中,并以此來(lái)完善和發(fā)展自己。 關(guān)鍵詞 個(gè)人主義;文化現(xiàn)象;積極因素;社會(huì)產(chǎn)物; Introduction This paper discusses the different recognitions towards individualism between Chinese and American people based on the different cultural background. American people think that individualism stands for personality。 it is also an alternative, which shows a person who has selfreliance and selfstruggle. It emphasizes on the independence, value, status, and personal right. All of them are sacred and inviolable. America is a multiculture country, after Columbus discovered this land, people from different places of the world flowed to the new land. Americans have been called rootless nationality, for most people live in America are from other places. During the reign of James I, the Presbyterian majority unsuccessfully attempted to impose their ideas on the established English church at the Hampton Court Conference. The result was mutual disaffection and a persecution of the Puritans, particularly by Archbishop William Laud, that brought about Puritan migration to Europe and America. They hoped to look for freedom and a new world. So when the Europeans on the May Flower stepped on this land, which had no national sentiment that should formed during a long time, the personal interests have been considered much important than anything else. It is a rule to protect one’s own interests in a strange place. However, in China, which has a long history of more than 5,000 years, the cultural origins could date back to the primitive society, when Shanding cave people lived and worked together the interests of the collective were sure to be much higher than personal interests were. Therefore, under the influence of the collective the personal interests, which could be considered as individualism, are much looked down upon. The vice influence of individualism is certainly exists, but it’s positive and reasonable side make America develop to be a powerful country in only 200 years. Though collectiv