動(dòng)物實(shí)驗(yàn)利與弊-資料下載頁
2025-05-12 00:06本頁面
【正文】 market are safe for humans to use. I feel that animal testing is necessary for the continuation of biological and safety research. Even with animal amp。 people testing, dangerous products still get on the market, imagine how many more will be on the market if we ban animal testing. 論點(diǎn)2：物競天擇Animal rights protesters are just a bunch of city dwellers who don39。t really understand how life works. Nature is predatory, the strongest survive, and by testing drugs and medical research on animals which creates cures for human diseases, then those animals died to help us survive. A simple extrapolation of the law of nature . 論點(diǎn)3：采取相應(yīng)的彌補(bǔ)措施：While we should never hurt animals in the interest of paltry（無價(jià)值的） cosmetics, research for lifesaving drugs and techniques requires limited use of real animals. I agree that animal testing should be continued, but agree with animal rights advocates that we should not be allowed to turn a blind eye to any suffering.總結(jié)：Even the most militant animal rights activist would have to admit one thing: if godforbid one of them had a child who became very ill, he would accept the absolute extinction of an entire animal species if it would save the life of that child.（反方應(yīng)對(duì)措施）I think animal testing labs should be open for random inspection. The results, including photographic evidence should be made public. Animal experimentation is a critical ponent in testing pharmeceuticals. Our knowledge in the supporting fields of biology, chemistry, and genetics is increasing geometrically. This is one field of human endeavor where the rewards are high, indeed critical to millions who suffer from currently untreatable disease. All in all , we should nor denied that animal tests are ’s out opinion, thank you.
教學(xué)教案相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1