【文章內(nèi)容簡介】
ave pointed out “that the life insurance doesn’t applies to the principle of pensation” in the case of life insurance agreement Fengyuejin VS Yongdaguangming pany. In the year of 2005, the notice about hearing the case of the life insurance agreement, issued by the Guizhou higher people’s court, ruled that the life insurance is the indemnify when the insured need cure because of illnesses or unintentional injury, pensate hospitalization costs of the insured has paid, and reduce, even avoid the lose of the material benefit, and the character of the life insurance is pensatory insurance, and the insured can’t earn profit because of illnesses or unintentional injury. Because there are provisions in the law, the discretionary power of the judges is larger, and the results that different courts hear are amendment of Insurance Law of the People’s Republic of China in the year has taken effect, provides a clear legal basis for resolving new issues in t