【文章內(nèi)容簡介】 being grateful for my wonderful husband. But I could, suggested Collie Conoley, another positive psychologist, express my gratitude for specific aspects of a certain person each day. He39。s a great cook. He always puts our family first. Life will never be perfect. I still see new stories that annoy me. The traffic in my city is maddening. I wish I could speed up my recovery. But with just one simple exercise, I39。m rediscovering the peace of that old saying: accepting the things I can39。t change, working without plaint to change what I can, and being wise enough to know the difference. And all it took was a little gratitude.（1）What39。s the author39。s attitude toward the student with desserts? A.Cautious.B.Respectful.C.Indifferent.D.Supportive.（2）Why was the author doubtful about the instructions? A.Because she thought it wasn39。t worth the effort.B.Because she didn39。t like expressing thanks often.C.Because she needed to ask her friend to do it first.D.Because she could do five things every day easily.（3）What does Collie Conoley suggest the author should do? A.Be grateful to her wonderful husband.B.Be thankful for things but not people.C.Be a great cook and put her family first.D.Be specific about what she39。s thankful for.（4）What39。s the best title for the text? A.Don39。t Be Bothered by Small ThingsB.We Can Change Everything If We WantC.Practicing Gratitude Changed My LifeD.Being Grateful to One Good Person【答案】 （1）A（2）A（3）D（4）C 【解析】【分析】本文是一篇夾敘夾議文，在一個星期的時間里，作者堅持每天都能發(fā)現(xiàn)五件她特別感激的事情，而且每天都有所不同。生活永遠不會完美。但通過這么一個簡單的練習，作者重新發(fā)現(xiàn)了那句老話的平和：接受我不能改變的事情，毫無怨言地去改變我能改變的，并且足夠明智地知道兩者的區(qū)別。這只需要一點感激之情。 （1）考查推理判斷。根據(jù)第一段中的“If an eager graduate student showed up in my office bearing desserts and asked me to pick one, I39。d cast a careful glance and ask ‘Why?’ before grabbing the apple pie.”如果一個心急的研究生拿著甜點出現(xiàn)在我的辦公室，讓我挑選一種，在抓蘋果派之前，我會仔細地看一眼，然后問“為什么?”可知，作者在抓蘋果派之前，會仔細地看一眼，然后問“為什么?”?？芍?，作者對帶甜點的學生持有謹慎的態(tài)度。故選A。 （2）考查推理判斷。根據(jù)第二段中的“my response was frankly doubtful. I did the math. Five things a day for seven days is a lot of brainpower to expend without so much as the promise of an apple pie.”我的反應坦率地說是懷疑的。我算了算。連續(xù)7天每天做5件事，甚至連吃蘋果派的承諾都沒有，那就太費腦力了?？赏浦?，作者認為對“連續(xù)7天每天做5件事”的要求充滿懷疑，認為太費腦力、不值得去做。故選A。 （3）考查細節(jié)理解。根據(jù)第四段中的“But I could, suggested Collie Conoley, another positive psychologist, express my gratitude for specific aspects of a certain person each day. He39。s a great cook. He always puts our family first.”但是另一位積極心理學家柯利康諾利建議道，我可以每天對一個人的某些方面表達我的感激之情。他是個很棒的廚師。他總是把我們的家庭放在第一位?？芍?，柯利康諾利建議作者每天對一個人的某些方面表達感激之情。由此可知，柯利康諾利建議作者具體說明她感激什么。故選D。 （4）考查推理判斷。根據(jù)最后一段中的“But with just one simple exercise, I39。m rediscovering the peace of that old saying: accepting the things I can39。t change, working without plaint to change what I can, and being wise enough to know the difference.”但通過一個簡單的練習，我重新發(fā)現(xiàn)了那句老話的平和：接受我不能改變的事情，毫無怨言地去改變我能改變的，并且足夠明智地知道兩者的區(qū)別）可知，練習表達感激，改變了作者的觀念和生活。由此可知選C。 【點評】本題考點涉及細節(jié)理解和推理判斷兩個題型的考查，是一篇人生感悟類閱讀，考生需要準確捕捉細節(jié)信息。并根據(jù)上下文進行邏輯推理，從而選出正確答案。5．閱讀理解 I39。m a single person and live with my dog. Jed isn39。t just my dog. He is my family. He goes everywhere with me. So I was overjoyed last year to hear that Bunnings was allowing dogs on a leash(皮帶) into their stores. But no sooner had the rule e in than it was quickly repealed(撤銷). A little girl in Victoria had walked up to a Jack Russell in a store and been bitten(咬傷). That was it. No more dogs. I don39。t know the whole story. But here39。s what I have to say: dogs bite sometimes and kids are sometimes difficult to control. There is nothing I love more than a kid who wants to touch Jed. But what39。s even better is when they ask permission first. I was at my local dog park last week. It39。s huge, with an offleash dog area to one side and a fencedoff kids39。 playground a good distance away. There was a family there that morning —parents and two young girls playing near the dog area. The elder girl started crying at the sight of Jed— puppy! There a puppy! Jed went right up and started licking(舔)her, which only made her cry louder. My dog was frightened and tried to get away. The little girl ran after him, shouting loudly. The parents did nothing。 they just let their kid frighten my dog and then said I should have stopped him from licking her. While they had a choice to play elsewhere, I did not. So I had to walk Jed away. I just don39。t want to have to meet a dog when I go shopping, said one caller on a radio show yesterday. Look, I get that. But the thing is, I don39。t always want to have your kid kick the back of my seat for two hours on a plane. When I lived in the UK and the US, I couldn39。t walk through the stores without stopping to pat dogs. Why can39。t we follow their practice?（1）What do we know about Jed? A.He is a troublemaker.B.He means a lot to the author.C.He is the author39。s only friend.D.He often goes shopping with: the author.（2）Why did Bunnings stop following the rule? A.A girl lost her dog there.B.Dogs were badlybehaved.C.Most people were against it.D.It wanted to keep its customers safe.（3）What happened at the dog park? A.The little girl was hurt.1