【正文】 ding only a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication.把審稿人想到的問題提前給一個(gè)交代，同時(shí)表明你已經(jīng)在思考這些問題，但是由于文章長(zhǎng)度，試驗(yàn)進(jìn)度或者試驗(yàn)手段的制約，暫時(shí)不能回答這些問題。事實(shí)上給出文章的不足恰恰是保護(hù)自己文章的重要手段。如果文章用了很多的Abbreviation, 兩種方法加以解決1) 在文章最好加上個(gè)Appendix，把所有Abreviation列表2) 在不同的頁面上，不時(shí)地給出Abbreciation的含義，用來提醒讀者。文章除了本專業(yè)的專業(yè)人士讀懂以外，一定要想辦法能讓更多的外專業(yè)人讀懂。補(bǔ)充說明的部份可以放在最后一個(gè)片段。首先第一段要明確告訴讀者你要討論幾個(gè)部份 ...Therefore, there are three aspects of this problen have tobe addressed.The first questuon involves...The second problem relates toThe thrid aspect deals with...上面的例子可以清晰地把觀點(diǎn)逐層敘述。解決的方法有：1)句子上下要有連貫，不能讓句子之間獨(dú)立常見的連接詞語有, However, also, in addition, consequently, afterwards, moreover, Furthermore,further, although, unlike, in contrast, Similarly,Unfortunately, alternatively, parallel results,In order to, despite, For example, Compared withother results, thus, therefore...用好這些連接詞，能夠使觀點(diǎn)表達(dá)得有層次，更加明確。怎樣提出觀點(diǎn) 在提出自己的觀點(diǎn)時(shí)，采取什么樣的策略很重要。We preliminarily focus on the older (younger)...或者有兩種時(shí)間尺度的問題 (longterm and short term)，你可以說兩者都重要，但是本文只涉及其中一種2) 研究區(qū)域的問題和時(shí)間問題一樣，明確提出你只關(guān)心這一地區(qū)d) 最后的原場(chǎng)在前言的最后，還可以總結(jié)性地提出，這一研究對(duì)其它研究的幫助。3)研究區(qū)域問題首先總結(jié)相鄰區(qū)域或者其它區(qū)域的研究，然后強(qiáng)調(diào)這一區(qū)域研究不足4)不確定性雖然前人對(duì)這一問題研究很多，但是目前有兩種或者更多種的觀點(diǎn)，這種uncertanties, ambiguities，值得進(jìn)一步澄清5)提出自己的假設(shè)來驗(yàn)證如果自己的研究完全是新的，沒有前人的工作進(jìn)行對(duì)比，在這種情況下，你可以自信地說，根據(jù)提出的過程，存在這種可能的結(jié)果，本文就是要證實(shí)這種結(jié)果。希望不要出現(xiàn)。 11. Accepted如果不要再審，只是小修改，編輯看后會(huì)馬上顯示這個(gè)狀態(tài)，但如果要再審也會(huì)有上面的部分狀態(tài)。 8. Decision in Process到了這一步就快要有結(jié)果了，編輯開始考慮是給修改還是直接拒， 當(dāng)然也有可能直接接受的，但可能性很小，呵呵。 5. Reviewer(s) invited 如果審稿人接受那就會(huì)是以下狀態(tài)： 6. Under review 這應(yīng)該是一個(gè)漫長(zhǎng)的等待。所以，能自如地駕馭好網(wǎng)上投稿這個(gè)新的投稿手段，對(duì)學(xué)者們而言無疑是件好事。但每份修改過的文件在網(wǎng)上都有記錄，而且每份審稿人的意見也都記錄在案。如果主編同意作者的意見，文章可以重新進(jìn)入新的一輪審稿程序。文件名稱明明顯示是修改稿，可審稿人打開文件后才發(fā)現(xiàn)是初稿又原封不動(dòng)地回來了，讓人有點(diǎn)哭笑不得。這份單獨(dú)的問答要整理成一份單獨(dú)的文件，在網(wǎng)上再次發(fā)稿時(shí)使用。經(jīng)過作者修改過的稿件又需要在網(wǎng)上重新發(fā)回編輯部。作者只需上網(wǎng)從自己的文件夾中調(diào)出文件修改即可。有些刊物的編輯部就設(shè)在出版社內(nèi)，這類期刊的檢查會(huì)更全面，包括文件形式、內(nèi)容、作者聯(lián)系方式、文章是否屬于重復(fù)性投稿等等。此外值得一提的是，部分著名出版社的網(wǎng)頁上除附有投稿需知外，還專門設(shè)計(jì)了針對(duì)網(wǎng)上投稿的指導(dǎo)示范文件。其實(shí)不然，只需耐心等待罷了。三是輸入文件完畢后，也就是所有的部分成功地輸入后，不要忘了點(diǎn)擊投稿發(fā)送鍵。二是確認(rèn)每個(gè)部分輸入的完整性。在輸入每個(gè)部分的時(shí)候，一是要通讀該部分的有關(guān)要求，再次確認(rèn)自已輸入的文件是否符合要求。 在網(wǎng)上投稿，頭一步是在網(wǎng)頁上注冊(cè)，也叫作者登記。如果找不到合適的老師，作者自己要耐心地自學(xué)。此外，不但原稿的內(nèi)容和格式要符合刊物的要術(shù)，而且在字?jǐn)?shù)、頁數(shù)、格式、文件儲(chǔ)存形式等方面，均要與投稿刊物的要求一致。有的文章還帶有附錄(APPENDIX)，如全部的實(shí)驗(yàn)原始數(shù)據(jù)、計(jì)算機(jī)軟件程序等。一般科技論文分為回顧性文章(REVIEW ARTICLE)，普通論文(REGULAR/RESEARCH ARTICLE)，快訊(SHORT COMMUNICATIONS)等。這種方式速度快，而且稿件不會(huì)丟失。這種形式曾經(jīng)是投稿的近乎唯一的方式，持續(xù)了漫長(zhǎng)的歲月，可現(xiàn)在采用這種方式接受來稿的刊物越來越少了。the overall quality of the English language is rather poor。 ments are appended below.  Reviewer 1: This work proposes an extensive review on micromulsionbased methods for the synthesis of Ag nanoparticles. As such, the matter is of interest, however the paper suffers for two serious limits:Reviewers have now mented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. McCabe amp。(3) 需要采用表格和圖件形式展示(數(shù)據(jù))材料。(5) 該模式也不是作者所說的那樣成功……(審稿人結(jié)合論文中的數(shù)據(jù)具體分析)審稿意見—2(1) 缺少直接相關(guān)的文獻(xiàn)引用(如…)。附1：中譯審稿意見審稿意見—1(1) 英文表達(dá)太差，盡管意思大致能表達(dá)清楚，但文法錯(cuò)誤太多。t seem to grasp the material meaning of those words. The author39。the journal39。 the author should concentrated on the new algorithm with your idea and explained its advantages clearly with a most simple words. only then can a proper review be performed. Most sentences contain grammatical and/or spelling mistakes or are not plete sentences.◆ As presented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal. There are problems with sentence structure, verb tense, and clause construction. ◆ The English of your manuscript must be improved before resubmission. We strongly suggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague who is wellversed in English or whose native language is English.◆ Please have someone petent in the English language and the subject matter of your paper go over the paper and correct it. ?◆ the quality of English needs improving. 來自編輯的鼓勵(lì)：Encouragement from reviewers:◆ I would be very glad to rereview the paper in greater depth once it has been edited because the subject is interesting. ◆ There is continued interest in your manuscript titled …… which you submitted to the Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: Part B Applied Biomaterials.◆ The Submission has been greatly improved and is worthy of publication... .. .. ..目標(biāo)和結(jié)果不清晰。對(duì)某個(gè)概念或工具使用的rationale/定義概念： What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume ratio?對(duì)研究問題的定義： Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear, write one section to define the problem如何凸現(xiàn)原創(chuàng)性以及如何充分地寫literature review: The topic is novel but the application proposed is not so novel.對(duì)claim,如A＞B的證明，verification: There is no experimental parison of the algorithm with previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an improvement on previous work.嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)度問題： MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove that. 1格式（重視程度）：◆ In addition, the list of references is not in our style. It is close but not pletely correct. I have attached a pdf file with Instructions for Authors which shows examples. ◆ Before submitting a revision be sure that your material is properly prepared and formatted. If you are unsure, please consult the formatting nstructions to authors that are given under the Instructions and Forms button in he upper righthand corner of the screen.1語言問題（出現(xiàn)最多的問題）：有關(guān)語言的審稿人意見：◆ It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader. ◆ The authors must have their work reviewed by a proper translation/reviewing service before submission。 The experiment is the major problem in the paper. Not only the dataset is not published, but also the description is very rough. It is impossible to r