國際私法法律規(guī)避問題研究稿-wenkub
2023-04-09 12:35:45 本頁面
【正文】 nt of personnel, technology, goods, capital and information, crossborder marriage, overseas workers, the more foreign buyers, foreign tourism, international civil activitiesmore into the daily life of Chinese people. All of these activities require a favorable legal environment to ensure its orderly conduct of view from the international civil and mercial exchanges, international investment, pensation trade, international leasing, marital behavior, inheritance of property relations, the law to circumvent the phenomenon more widespread evasion of law occupies an important position in international private law, the law to circumvent the problem of this topic is very urgent and very important study of private international law.Evasion of law is an important issue in international private law, now, more and more countries and regions for the human pursuit of legal justice, the value and dignified defenders of national legislation, through legislation or judicial practice of the law to circumvent be prohibited or restrictions. But whether fo legal circumvention is “all” invalid or “some” invalid, the country’s attitude is different. From the perspective of private international law, legal circumvention behavior, without a scienttific approach to, regardless of circumvention of the within the law of the land or foreign law, will distort the normal of the international civil and mercial exchanges between the relationship of the development, the law to circumvent the causes, current situation, the characteristics of and future development trends, a detailed study. The correct understanding of the law to circumvent the problem of the nature and effectiveness of the system are the main issues discussed in this topics, on the theory and practice of the law on the proper handing of private international law to circumvent the problem has important practical significance.Keywvord：Private International Law；Evasion of Law；Effect；Axiology一、法律規(guī)避概述法律規(guī)避制度是傳統(tǒng)國際私法的重要組成部分之一。自從1878年法國最高法院對鮑富萊蒙王妃離婚案(Bauffremont’s DivorceCase)作出判決后，法律規(guī)避問題便引起了國際私法學(xué)界的廣泛注意和較為深入的研究。四，既遂性，即當(dāng)事人客觀上達(dá)到了目的，未遂行為不構(gòu)成法律規(guī)避。法律規(guī)避是通過故意制造一個連結(jié)點的手段來實現(xiàn)的。第三， 認(rèn)為法律規(guī)避有四個構(gòu)成要件:從主觀上講,當(dāng)事人規(guī)避某種法律必須是出于故意,也就是說,當(dāng)事人有逃避適用某種法律的意圖。第四， 認(rèn)為構(gòu)成法律規(guī)避必須具備六項要件:法律規(guī)避必須有當(dāng)事人逃避某種法律的行為。法律規(guī)避必須是既遂的。換言之,由于法律規(guī)避都是通過改變連結(jié)點來實現(xiàn)的,但在現(xiàn)實生活中,連結(jié)點的改變有時是正常的,只有當(dāng)事人具有規(guī)避法律的意圖時方有構(gòu)成法律規(guī)避的可能。在這種情況下,該當(dāng)事人改變其國籍不能視為法律規(guī)避。這也就是說,不存在未遂的法律規(guī)避。以梅爾希奧(Melchior)、巴丹、馬卡洛夫(Makarov)、貝特拉姆(Bertran)為代表的部分學(xué)者認(rèn)為法律規(guī)避是公共秩序保留制度的一部分。我認(rèn)為法律規(guī)避是一個獨立的問題,并不附屬于公共秩序問題,因為: (1)法律規(guī)避和公共秩序產(chǎn)生的原因不同,前者是
教學(xué)課件相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1