【正文】 GRE ANALYTICAL WRITING 夏 鵬 聯(lián)系方式：人人網(wǎng)公共主頁(yè) 夏鵬 [正版 ] 新浪微 博：夏鵬左派的溫柔 關(guān)于新 GRE寫作的幾個(gè)重要概念 核心測(cè)試點(diǎn)：（ OG P11） 批判性思維 分析性寫作技能 清晰表達(dá) 支持復(fù)雜觀點(diǎn) 構(gòu)建能力 評(píng)估論證能力 學(xué)術(shù)性寫作風(fēng)格(Writing Style): 主題集中 有條理 ISSUE題目： 針對(duì)一般性話題提出觀點(diǎn)，包含如何就話題進(jìn)行回應(yīng) 提 出 明確的寫作要求 。 任務(wù)： ? 評(píng)估話題 ? 考慮復(fù)雜性 ? 推理和實(shí)例展開(kāi)論證并支持自己的觀點(diǎn) ARGUMENT題目： 依據(jù)具體題目要求對(duì) 已有的論證 進(jìn)行評(píng)估。 任務(wù)： ? 論證是否符合邏輯 考試模式： 在所有 GRE考試內(nèi)容的第一項(xiàng)出現(xiàn) Issue 30分鐘 Argument 30分鐘 所有 AW的考題均出自于官方題庫(kù) 每項(xiàng)滿分 6分， 2022年開(kāi)始啟動(dòng) erater計(jì)劃 課時(shí)分配 Issue: 6節(jié)課 Language: 2節(jié)課 Argument: 2節(jié)課 幾個(gè)學(xué)生經(jīng)常問(wèn)到的問(wèn)題 GRE寫作需要準(zhǔn)備多長(zhǎng)時(shí)間 ? 托福 90分以上，寫作單項(xiàng)不低于 20分 你的基礎(chǔ) ? 4分以上 你的目標(biāo) 每天 2個(gè)小時(shí)， 3個(gè)月 GRE寫作用模板會(huì)怎樣 會(huì)死 GRE寫作需要背范文么 不 GRE分?jǐn)?shù)和字?jǐn)?shù)有關(guān)系么 沒(méi) GRE借鑒別人的文章會(huì)被判抄襲么 會(huì) 網(wǎng)上有 很多 GRE寫作的高頻，要看么？ 這個(gè)可以有 推薦幾本 GRE寫作復(fù)習(xí)的參考書 OG The Economist TIME 《 民主的細(xì)節(jié) 》 《 重新發(fā)現(xiàn)社會(huì) 》 Elements of Styles A People’s History of The United States 舊 《 GRE官方題庫(kù)范文 》 上課如何聽(tīng)講 內(nèi)容區(qū) 評(píng)論區(qū) 課后反思區(qū) 鼓勵(lì)錄音回家聽(tīng) 課間休息丌答疑，有問(wèn)題寫紙條 如何與老師互動(dòng) 互動(dòng)提問(wèn)的要求 不是你提的問(wèn)題我都會(huì)回答，我回答的都是有意義的問(wèn)題，不回答的問(wèn)題，一般是沒(méi)有什么意義的 如何避免提沒(méi)有意義的問(wèn)題 認(rèn)真聽(tīng)課，你的絕大多數(shù)問(wèn)題，其實(shí)都在課上回答了。不要為了提問(wèn)而提問(wèn) 對(duì)于其他門派的復(fù)習(xí)方法問(wèn)題，不回答 ? 例如：我聽(tīng) XXX老師說(shuō)要這樣 …… 對(duì)于情商不高的問(wèn)題（挑戰(zhàn)我思路的問(wèn)題），基本不回答 ? 例如：夏總，你這個(gè)點(diǎn)講錯(cuò)了。 ? 你這么宣揚(yáng)美國(guó)民主制度，難道美國(guó)的民主制度就沒(méi)有缺陷么？ ? 你為什么這么自大？ 如何避免 GRE備考中出現(xiàn)自虐從而虐他的慘劇 不要鉆牛角尖 ，很多問(wèn)題是無(wú)解的 不要完美主義，你如果不能理解我的思路，索性就不要理解了 針對(duì)不會(huì)寫的題目，請(qǐng)自我安慰：這個(gè)題不會(huì)考的，不會(huì)考的，不會(huì)的，不會(huì)的，夏總會(huì)保佑我的。 GRE考不好，還可以掃大街。 Tomorrow is another day 面對(duì)自己的無(wú)知和無(wú)能的最為重要的社會(huì)底線，就是不要用自己的無(wú)知和無(wú)能去麻煩別人，即便你給了別人錢 GRE寫作有什么捷徑 死磕 那聽(tīng)新東方的課，戒者說(shuō)聽(tīng)你的課，對(duì) GRE提 分幫助大么 不大 那么可以退班么？ 試聽(tīng)期內(nèi) 可以 鼓勵(lì)鼓勵(lì)我，聽(tīng)完你講的，我都絕望了 從絕望中尋希望，人生終將輝煌 那你的課到底能幫助我們什么 為成為一個(gè)合格的知識(shí)分子，打下最為基本的理性思維和人文關(guān)懷 ISSUE的評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn) SCORING 6 In addressing the specific task directions, a 6 response presents a cogent and wellarticulated analysis of the issue and convey the meaning skillfully ? Articulates a clear and insightful position on the issue in accordance with the assigned task ? Develops the position fully with pelling reason and/or persuasive examples ? Sustains a wellfocused, wellanized analysis, connecting ideas logically ? Conveys ideas fluently and precisely, using effective vocabulary and sentence variety ? Demonstrates superior facility with the conventions of standard written English (grammar, usage, and mechanics) but may have minor errors 回憶一下 Style Language position reason examples logic analysis 寫作時(shí)要避免發(fā)生的情況 （ SCORING 3及以下 ） Vague or limited in addressing the specific task directions and/or in presenting or developing a position on the issue Weak in the use of relevant reasons or examples or relies largely on unsupported claims Limited in focus and/or anization Has problems in language and sentence structure that result in a lack of clarity Contains occasional major errors or frequent minor errors in grammar, usage or mechanics that can interfere with meaning 什么樣的文章是 3分以下 毛新宇 范文分析 6分范文 分析 As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position. The statement linking technology negatively [立場(chǎng)明確 ] with free thinking plays on recent human experience over the past century. Surely [邏輯承接 ] there has been no time in history where the lived lives of people have changed [埋下伏筆 ] more dramatically. A quick reflection on a typical day [針對(duì)前文的change給出進(jìn)一步擴(kuò)展 ] reveals how technology has revolutionized [立場(chǎng)詞 ] the world. Most people mute to work in an automobile that runs on an internal bustion engine. During the workday, chances are high that the employee will interact with a puter that processes information on silicon bridges that are .09 microns wide. Upon leaving home, family members will be reached through wireless works that utilize satellites orbiting the earth[對(duì)于上文的 typical day中 technology如何 revolutionized the world給出具體描述 ]. Each of these mon occurrences could have been inconceivable at the turn of the 19th century[再次表明立場(chǎng) ]. 邏輯結(jié)構(gòu) Technology changed human life car puter Mobile phone Technology changed human life statement The statement attempts to bridge these dramatic changes to a reduction in the ability for humans to think for themselves [重述題目 ]. The assumption [挖掘題目成立的邏輯前提 ] is that an increased reliance on technology negates the need for people to think creatively to solve previous quandaries. Looking back at the introduction, one could argue that without a car, puter, or mobile phone[與第一段出現(xiàn)的例子次序完全對(duì)應(yīng) ], the hypothetical worker would need to find alternate methods of transport, information processing and munication[再次對(duì)應(yīng) ]. Technology short circuits this thinking by making the problems obsolete[給出 technology讓人們思考能力下降的原因， subpoint]. Technology changed human life car puter Mobile phone Technology changed human life statement Negative sides of tech transportation information munication Tech short circuits human thinking However[邏輯轉(zhuǎn)折 ], this reliance on technology does not necessarily preclude the creativity that marks the human species [重復(fù)轉(zhuǎn)折法 ]. The prior examples reveal that technology allows for convenience. The car, puter and phone [一致性 ] all release additional time for people to live more efficiently. This efficiency [重復(fù)前詞，頂真結(jié)構(gòu) ] does not preclude the need for humans to think for themselves.[樹(shù)立對(duì)立觀點(diǎn) ] In fact, technology frees humanity to not only tackle new problems, but may itself create new issues that did not exist without technology[subpoint]. For example,