【正文】 rthing visit is unlikely to be successful. However，I will go anywav to lend them a chance to vent their anger or plaints. As I just mentioned now,I do not think my visit will lead me into a minefield ,only that l will encounter a negative atmosphere in the United States. By going to the United States l will trv to clarify the truth and also to resume the momentum of developing a constructive strategic partnership between China and the United States. Just now you asked me to clarify the truth about the allegation of China stealing US militarv secrets. Now I’d like to answer the question. To me some people in the United States have made two mistakes． One is that the they have underestimated the ability of the United States to guard their secrets To my knowledge，the Los Alamos laboratory has very tight security measures. As each of those working there knows about only a part of a project，it is impossible for them to leak any secrets．Therefore，even now，they have not found any solid evidence to prosecute Dr Wen Ho Lee. They can only fire him. We shall never forget history. Historically，both China and the United States have experienced such periods when hysteria bees the norm. A typical example in China is the“cultural revolution.” Another of fheir rmistakes is that they have underestimated China military research development capabiiities， The Chinese are intelligent and diligent，as evidenced by many Chinese Americans． Also a case in point is that China independently developed its atomic and hydrogen bombs and man made satellites. China is fully capable of developing any military technology. It is only a matter of time. But please keep in mind that China is the first countrv to declare that not be the first to use nuclear weapons．Already we have imposed an moratorium on nuclear testing. We’ve agreed wlth the United States on the mudnon，targeting of missiles ffainst each should Chjna take the political and moraI risk of stealing others’ military technology or secrets？ The alleged Chinese theft of US military technology is only a fictioh. 臺(tái)灣人權(quán)新聞通訊社記者：1993年下半年開(kāi)始實(shí)施的宏觀調(diào)控有成效。 對(duì)付亞洲金融危機(jī)有一個(gè)很大的截阻作用； 在中國(guó)內(nèi)部使金融市場(chǎng)穩(wěn)定，物價(jià)穩(wěn)定，社會(huì)穩(wěn)定。請(qǐng)問(wèn)宏觀調(diào)控今后怎樣繼續(xù)做到內(nèi)外兼顧？另外，您這次到美國(guó)去將面臨人權(quán)問(wèn)題，這個(gè)問(wèn)題也可能是一個(gè)焦點(diǎn)。請(qǐng)就人權(quán)問(wèn)題提出您的看法。Since the introduction of the policy of macro regulation and control in the second half of 1993，such policy has produced four major results. The first result is that it helped China to cope with the Asian financial crisis．Secondly, it also has exerted three major functions in China，that is stability of the currency，the second is the stability of prices，and the third is social my question is jn the course of macro regulation and control by what measures would you take into consideration all these four functions and also in your fiscal and economic policies. You are going to visit the United States soon, so l expect the human rights question will bee a very important topic during your trip. Would you please give us some of your views on this issue？ 答：1993年下半年開(kāi)始采取加強(qiáng)宏觀調(diào)控的措施，當(dāng)時(shí)正是中國(guó)加大改革開(kāi)放力度，取得巨大成就的時(shí)候。與此同時(shí)也出現(xiàn)了某種程度的過(guò)熱，就是在房地產(chǎn)、開(kāi)發(fā)區(qū)、股票市場(chǎng)方面出現(xiàn)了過(guò)熱現(xiàn)象。這種過(guò)熱導(dǎo)致1994年通貨膨脹達(dá)到21．7％。當(dāng)時(shí)鄧小平同志還在世，在他的支持下，以江澤民同志為核心的黨中央決定加強(qiáng)宏觀調(diào)控，采取了16條措施，其中13條是經(jīng)濟(jì)措施，有11條是關(guān)于金融方面的。由于加強(qiáng)了宏觀調(diào)控，使中國(guó)在兩年多一點(diǎn)的時(shí)間解決了經(jīng)濟(jì)過(guò)熱問(wèn)題，改革開(kāi)放和社會(huì)主義建設(shè)取得了很大成績(jī)。去年中國(guó)之所以能夠抵御亞洲金融危機(jī)的沖擊，就是因?yàn)槲覀冊(cè)?993年已經(jīng)發(fā)生了這種金融問(wèn)題，幸好我們?cè)谒€未擴(kuò)大的時(shí)候就把它制止住了。我們有了宏觀調(diào)控的經(jīng)驗(yàn)，才使我們?cè)谌ツ甑膩喼藿鹑谖C(jī)中站得筆直。我在這里想介紹2月16日《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》發(fā)表的一篇文章，這篇文章意思是說(shuō)美國(guó)在亞洲大力推行資本的過(guò)分流動(dòng)，促成了危機(jī)的發(fā)生，危機(jī)發(fā)生后又通過(guò)國(guó)際金融組織貸款，要一些國(guó)家實(shí)行緊縮財(cái)政、提高利率等并不適合這些國(guó)家的政策，結(jié)果使金融危機(jī)加深。 關(guān)于這個(gè)問(wèn)題、這些觀點(diǎn)，我早在去年就已經(jīng)講過(guò)，所有到中國(guó)來(lái)訪問(wèn)的貴賓，我都給他們講過(guò)，包括你們《時(shí)代》雜志2月15日一期封面上的3個(gè)人：格林斯潘、魯賓、薩默斯，你們稱之為阻止了世界金融崩潰的3個(gè)人。這3個(gè)人我去年都跟他們談過(guò)，我想他們也同意我的觀點(diǎn)。 我說(shuō)這些話，并不是想跟《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》那兩位作者分稿費(fèi)，因?yàn)槲业倪@個(gè)觀點(diǎn)也沒(méi)有申請(qǐng)專利。我只是說(shuō)，經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展、金融的開(kāi)放必須有宏觀調(diào)控，要根據(jù)每個(gè)國(guó)家的具體情況實(shí)行不同的宏觀調(diào)控政策。過(guò)快地要求一個(gè)國(guó)家開(kāi)放資本市場(chǎng)，過(guò)分地?cái)U(kuò)大資本的流動(dòng)性，往往欲速不達(dá)，很可能破壞這個(gè)國(guó)家的經(jīng)濟(jì)。剛才還提出了一個(gè)人權(quán)問(wèn)題。我想這也是在座很多記者想向我提出的一個(gè)問(wèn)題。所有跟我們中國(guó)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人會(huì)見(jiàn)的外賓，很少有不談人權(quán)問(wèn)題的，好像不談中國(guó)的人權(quán)問(wèn)題回去就不好交待。因此，這個(gè)問(wèn)題在我向他們重復(fù)了這么多遍以后，今天實(shí)在不想再講了。就是美國(guó)國(guó)務(wù)卿奧爾布賴特最近訪問(wèn)中國(guó)時(shí)，我告訴她一句話。我說(shuō)：“我參加爭(zhēng)取和保障人權(quán)運(yùn)動(dòng)的歷史比你早得多。”她說(shuō)：“是嗎？”表示她不同意我的意見(jiàn)。我就說(shuō)：“不是嗎？”我說(shuō)：“我比你大10歲，當(dāng)我冒著生命危險(xiǎn)同國(guó)民黨政權(quán)作斗爭(zhēng)，參加爭(zhēng)取中國(guó)的民主、自由、人權(quán)運(yùn)動(dòng)的時(shí)候，你還在上中學(xué)呢?！?It was in l993 that China set up its policy of macro regulation and control． That was a time when China had achieved great results after the widening of opening up to the outside world and deepening reform. Meanwhlle，there was also some overheating in the economic sector ,mainly in the real estate sector and the stock economic overheating resulted in a very high inflation rate of 21．7 per cent in l994. At that time Deng Xiaoping still alive. With his support，and also under the leadership of the CPC CentraI Committee with rade Jiang Zemin at the core，the decision was made to strengthen macro regulation and control．Sixteen measures were adopted，of which l3 were economic measures. And out of the 13 economic measures,11 were related to the banking and financial sector .Thanks to these 16 measures adopted aimed at strengthening macro regulation and control，within a period of a little more than two years，China successfully resolved the problem of economic overheating and resumed the momentum of economic growth，and also scored great achievements in socialist development. The reason why China had managed to avoid the impact of the Asian financial crisis last year was that it already experienced such a kind of financial crisis in l993． And, fortunately,we managed to check such financial crisis before it spread. And it was precisely because of the accumulated experiece of macro regulation and control that we were able to stand rock solid last year amid the Asian financial crisis I’d like to remend to you a February 16 article in The New York Times titled Would Aid Asia to Let Cash Flow in According to this article，the United States has played a part in promoting the oyerflow of capital in Asia.,that result in the eruption of the crisis in Asia. After the eruption of the crisis, international financial institutions came out to extend loans to these countries while acpanied by some policies which were not approprlate to their national conditions，such as proposals for fiscal austerity and raising interest rates，that