胎兒權(quán)利的法律保護外文翻譯-文庫吧
2025-04-16 18:47 本頁面
【正文】 ：對界定不是對另一個 人的照管義務(wù)，也不是一個人的配偶，父母或后代，而是另一個在有限的時間內(nèi)與自己共存的人。 接受懷孕作出道義上的差異并不是在于 本身， 我們州的限制可能會因此發(fā)生被期待母親的行為。一個期待女人的懷孕（情愿或不情愿地），假設(shè)新的道義上的義務(wù)與未來的父親一樣，但是政府不一定擁有相應的權(quán)力，以確保這種道德履行職責。這個問題仍然存在，社會能恰當?shù)匾笠幻袐D有什么樣的犧牲，在多大程度上可以合法地限制她的行為。 4 外文文獻翻譯原文 The fetus and the law SHELLEY BURTT Department of Political Science， Yale University， New Haven， CT 065208301， USA The fetus and the law： Maternalist vs． natalist perspectives Delimiting the nature and scope of state authority over pregnant women I snot an exclusively American problem． Through its laws and judicial decisions， every nation takes a position (not always logical or coherent or just) on this question． In the United States， however， a number of recent developments have bined to focus attention on the possibly unique political status of the expectant mother in a particularly striking way． Most familiar perhaps is the debate over how to control the growing problem of substance abuse during pregnancy． The National Center for Health Statistics documented a 50 percent increase in infants born with indications of maternal drug use between 1986 and 1988 (Kennedy， 1991： p． 558)． One Senate document places the number of drugexposed newborns at 11 per cent of all births (Johnsen， 1989： p． 212)． Discussion of the nature and scope of state authority over pregnant women has also been fueled by several spectacular cases of court ordered medical interventions on pregnant women， rapid advances in medical technology that allow increasingly early detection and treatment of fetal irregularities ， new understanding and attention to those health hazards in workplace and environment that promise fetal development and， inevitably， continued conflict over the number of abortions performed in the United States each year． 5 Each of these areas of controversy raises questions： about the extent of parental and munity
畢業(yè)設(shè)計相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1