日本、中國(guó)與韓國(guó)的國(guó)土空間規(guī)劃體系-展示頁(yè)
2025-08-13 01:33本頁(yè)面
【正文】 he purpose of this study is to arrange major spatial plans of three countries according to classification of urban and nonurban area, and to clarifying role of each spatial plan.。文摘:本研究是在進(jìn)行中國(guó)、日本、韓國(guó)的國(guó)土規(guī)劃體系前提下,探討整個(gè)亞洲東部的綜合空間規(guī)劃的可能性。As a result, Korea, the smallest country among three countries, has one system on land use, development and conservation, considering whole national territory to be one city planning area, and a role and relation of each spatial plan is paratively clear. On the other hand, China, the largest country among three countries, although a role and relation of each spatial plan are clear in urban area, a general recognition for necessity of nonurban area planning is weak. In case of Japan, the characteristics that the spatial planning system is consisted on the division into urban area and nonurban area, is very similar to China, and there is hardly relation between these two kinds of spatial planning.最終,作為最小國(guó)家的韓國(guó),已擁有一個(gè)針對(duì)土地使用、發(fā)展與保護(hù)的體系,它把整個(gè)國(guó)家領(lǐng)土是一個(gè)城市規(guī)劃區(qū)考慮，每個(gè)空間的規(guī)劃的角色和關(guān)系較為清楚。在日本，空間規(guī)劃系統(tǒng)對(duì)城市區(qū)域和非城市地區(qū)的劃分原則跟中國(guó)是非常相似的 ,這兩種類型的空間規(guī)劃幾乎沒有必然的關(guān)系。 Japan。 Korea。 Eastern Asia Community.關(guān)鍵詞:國(guó)土規(guī)劃。Recently it is frequently discussed on the Eastern Asia Community. This is still mainly focused on the economy, but in environmental aspect we also have some mon serious problems , development, biodiversity, outstanding landscape/nature conservation, balanced development of town and country, cultural assets conservation/utilization and several environmental problems. In order to settle these subjects, it is important not only to challenge by each country but also to prepare a mon framework for prehensive spatial planning covering whole eastern Asia..最近東亞共同體經(jīng)常被討論，主要關(guān)注仍然是經(jīng)濟(jì)問(wèn)題,但在環(huán)保方面我們也有一些常見的嚴(yán)重問(wèn)題需要解決,如可持續(xù)發(fā)展、生物多樣性、優(yōu)秀景觀、自然保護(hù)、城鄉(xiāng)協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展、文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)、環(huán)境問(wèn)題等。This study was done to clarify the similarities and differences of national territory planning system of Japan, China and Korea as a first step to discuss on the subjects and possibilities of prehensive Eastern Asian spatial planning. Until now the national territory planning system of Japan and Korea have already been studied , but the parative study between three countries including China from the viewpoint of spatial planning has never seen before. We used mainly related literatures on planning system and government39。s major spatial plans into four categories,national, regional, urban area and non urban area, and discussed on the vertical and horizontal relation between them.本研究之目的：第一步是明確日本、中國(guó)和韓國(guó)的國(guó)土規(guī)劃體系的異同,討論綜合東亞空間規(guī)劃的課題和可能性。我們主要在每一個(gè)國(guó)家的規(guī)劃系統(tǒng)的相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)、政府的官方網(wǎng)站上闡明了本篇研究的目的。1 National Territory Planning System of Japan The Comprehensive National Development Act(1950), Land Use Planning Act(1974) and City Planning Act (1968) support Japanese major spatial planning (Table 1). These are all under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Land, infrastructure and Transport. The CNDP provides tongrange visions on nationwide land use, development and conservation, social overhead capital, and a traffic policy. According this plan, the CPDP and MLP are to be prepared. The Plans provided by Land Use Planning Act includes NLP and PLP on the perspective of effective national land use
環(huán)評(píng)公示相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1