【正文】
References:[1] M. Li and 1. Sakamoto. 2003. A Comparative study on the Urban planning system of large cities in Institute. 38(3):301306[2] K. Ye and T. Kinoshita. 2005. A Comparative Study on the Development System of the National Territory and Related Acts in Japan and Korea. Journal of the JLA. 68(5):8598132[3]中國(guó)城市規(guī)畫(huà)設(shè)計(jì)研究院(2004).城市規(guī)畫(huà)資料集1,[4](20050616 16:39)[5]://. (20050615 16:09)[6]國(guó)土規(guī)劃、區(qū)域規(guī)劃、城市規(guī)劃.12 / 12。如果我們假定東亞空間規(guī)劃為一個(gè)社會(huì),則環(huán)境、生物圈、文化保護(hù)區(qū),經(jīng)濟(jì)和社會(huì)交流,交通路線和戰(zhàn)略等學(xué)科將會(huì)有更廣泛的任務(wù)。 通過(guò)這項(xiàng)研究,我們可以參考,一個(gè)國(guó)家領(lǐng)土之間的大小和規(guī)劃體系的特點(diǎn)有很大關(guān)系。在中國(guó),現(xiàn)在的重點(diǎn)是規(guī)劃與城市經(jīng)濟(jì)高增長(zhǎng)相協(xié)調(diào)??臻g規(guī)劃不包括幾乎非注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師地區(qū),因此從多方向角度的改善全面的環(huán)境或景觀可能是困難的。今后,根據(jù)經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化和自然條件有可能設(shè)置超出單一的行政單元規(guī)劃來(lái)有效地連接近遠(yuǎn)計(jì)劃。 (2)垂直關(guān)系的計(jì)劃:中國(guó)和韓國(guó)之間的計(jì)劃縱向關(guān)系比較明確,因?yàn)樗鼈兌季哂泻軓?qiáng)的性質(zhì),規(guī)劃政策從上倒下貫穿。s prehensive planning in three countries, in other words, to conserve their own nature, culture and landscapes of nonurban area, strengthening local identity and originality. Through this study, we can refer that there is a big relation between the size of national territory and a character of the planning system. Wider national territory has more multistage administrative unit, and the planning phase also tends to bee more plicated. If we assumed the Eastern Asian Spatial Planning as one munity, the subjects would be wider regional tasks like nature/environment/biosphere/cultural area conservation, economical and social interchange, and strategic traffic route,’etc. Considering these themes, it will be needed in the future to collect information about Eastern Asia to study possibility of a wide area zoning across the country borders.4結(jié)論:(1)行為和國(guó)家有關(guān)部委主管領(lǐng)土的計(jì)劃:可以說(shuō),日本和中國(guó)有類(lèi)似的規(guī)劃體系。 4 Conclusions(1)Acts and petent ministries related national territory plan: One may say that Japan and China have similar planning system, as .showing () when there is plural acts that support national territory plan, the relation between plans and a role of each ministry should be made clear.(2)Vertical relation of plans: China and Korea has paratively clear vertical relation between plans because they both have strong nature to transmit planning policy from top to bottom. However, an each plan of China was strictly bound to administrative unit and in Japan the role of semiwide area planning is relatively weak. In the future, setting widearea planning beyond single administrative unit would be possible to connect effectively the higher plans and the lower plans,according to economic, cultural and natural conditions.(3)Spatial area covered by national territory plan: In Japan the area covered by a certain prehensive plan is actually limited to city planning area (CPA). Spatial planning does not cover almost nonCPA area。韓國(guó)作為一個(gè)小國(guó),對(duì)城鎮(zhèn)和農(nóng)村的采用不同的規(guī)劃制度,以帶來(lái)的非城市地區(qū)的環(huán)境或景觀發(fā)展,因此它使得2002年運(yùn)用城市規(guī)劃下建立新的行為非市區(qū)成為可能。COP和其他部委的關(guān)系是明確的。CP(包括市區(qū))和COP(包括非地區(qū)的城市)是長(zhǎng)期提供全面的空間規(guī)劃,兩個(gè)計(jì)劃包括一個(gè)總體規(guī)劃和管理計(jì)劃. CMP 和COMP提供指導(dǎo)和土地利用,開(kāi)發(fā)和保護(hù)以及CMaF和COMAP是他們的目標(biāo)進(jìn)行管理。這兩個(gè)計(jì)劃所提供的行為完全分擔(dān)責(zé)任。 viewpoints.三、韓國(guó)國(guó)土規(guī)劃體系 韓國(guó)系統(tǒng)要比日本和中國(guó)的簡(jiǎn)單些,反映了小國(guó)家的領(lǐng)土。3 National Territory Planning System of Korea The Korean system is simpler than the Japanese and the Chinese one, reflecting small national territory. Major spatial planning related acts are the Framework Act of National Territory(2002) and the Act