【正文】 ..........................................21..................................................22（二）對(duì)盜竊罪預(yù)備與未遂的分析 .................................24“著手”的觀點(diǎn)....................................24................................................25六、盜竊罪與相關(guān)財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪的界定 ....................................26(一)盜竊罪與詐騙罪的區(qū)別 .......................................26..................................27 .....................27（二）盜竊罪與毀壞公私財(cái)物罪 ...................................28................................................28............................................29（三）盜竊罪與侵占罪 ...........................................29結(jié)束語(yǔ)參考文獻(xiàn) .......................................................31一、著作類： ...................................................31二、論文類： ...................................................312論盜竊罪的認(rèn)定前言盜竊作為人類最古老的罪名之一。 objective。關(guān)鍵詞：盜竊罪犯罪客觀方面犯罪故意犯罪著手3AbstractIn the democratic rule of law society, private lawful property rights, which shallnot be infringed has bee universally accepted fact. As the occupation of stealingthe property crime type, burglary has always been taken seriously by all ages andnations. With the pace of the social development, both foreign and Chinese criminallaw experts are studying and arguing the specific shape changes and verification aboutburglary. There are two reasons for the concerning of Stealing: the first is that itseriously infringe the protection of criminal Legal Interest. The second reason forconcerning is its plexity of in the judicial practice and the difficulty of judicialoperation. Combining with the plicated situation which often appears in judicialpractice, author will discuss the main problems of stealing, about 25000 words in all.In addition to the introduction and conclusion, full text can be divided into sixparts:the first part ,recogniziation of the object. As the feature, The academic circlehave some different ideas: some people think that it should be tangible, other peoplethink it should have management possibility and value .The author thinks that theobject of stealing should have four characteristics, namely: the ascedance, theeconomic value, the legal exclusion, especially the movable property.At the sametime, whether some special items (such as contraband, etc) can bee the object oftheft, the author think we should analyze detailed feather because of legal nature ofcontraband itself.The second part ，the cognizance of the objective behaviors. Secret filch is a mainpatterns of behavior which have been used to distinguish theft and other propertycrime.This part discuss the theft behavior , and still insist on this feature. Theauthor also puts forward to have a good understanding of the connotation and featuresof secret filch, such as subjectivity, time limiting , relativity. The second part, theauthor, based on the spirit of the amendment of criminal law (8) ,discuss a few kindsof special theft behavior: burglary, carrying weapon theft and pickpocketing. In itsconnotation and determination ,the author make a deep understanding and analysis ,1such as the understanding of burglary and the definition of the weapon , etc.The third part,the subjectivity. The subjective intent on stealing, I think, should bedirectly intentionally. Because the most important difference between the directintentional and indirect intentional is different volition. That who see what will stealwhat state of mind, can not evaluate for indirect intentional. About the directintentional, the author thinks that we should analysis the cognitive and motive factorswhich lie in volition , no matter what the theory will develop or the society will need .Such as cognitive factors which include understanding of criminal behavior and objectof crime. Grasping the two factors, it will be helpful for the judicial worker to identifythe stealing.The fourth part, the conviction of plot. The conviction of stealing plot directlyaffect the theft, sin and the sin of the determination. This part, we discuss the questionmainly from times and amounts .The author thinks that we should be sure tounderstand the times. At the same time, as in a large amount, we also should graspthe connotation of the amount and make accurate grasp of the large amount.The fifth part, the crime state of stop. On the standards of acplishent,academic circles forms different views. By addressing several thoughts, the authorthinks the best suitable standards is control。在司法實(shí)踐中，對(duì)盜竊罪與其他財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪的區(qū)分和辨別是很重要的，本部分主要通過選取一些財(cái)產(chǎn)型犯罪與盜竊罪進(jìn)行比較，如詐騙罪、侵占罪、毀壞公私財(cái)物罪等。學(xué)界在關(guān)于盜竊既遂的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)方面存在分歧，筆者在對(duì)幾種觀點(diǎn)加以評(píng)說的基礎(chǔ)上，認(rèn)為“控制說”比較符合盜竊罪既遂的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)；后半部分，筆者從盜竊罪未遂與盜竊預(yù)備相區(qū)分的的關(guān)鍵盜竊著手出發(fā)，重點(diǎn)論述了：什么是盜竊罪的著手，應(yīng)該如何認(rèn)定著手等問題，并結(jié)合普通盜竊和特殊的盜竊，如入戶盜竊等進(jìn)行論述。此部分，主要從多次盜竊與盜竊數(shù)額這兩個(gè)重要的定罪情節(jié)展開論述，筆者認(rèn)為，在認(rèn)定多次盜竊時(shí)，一定要準(zhǔn)確的理解“次”以及“多次”的問題，同時(shí)在認(rèn)定數(shù)額較大時(shí)，也要對(duì)數(shù)額的內(nèi)涵以及作為定罪的最低標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的“數(shù)2額較大”做出準(zhǔn)確的把握。第四部分，盜竊罪的定罪情節(jié)。問繞著直接故意，筆者認(rèn)為，不管是從理論的發(fā)展還是從實(shí)踐的需要來講 ，都應(yīng)對(duì)故意的構(gòu)成要素:認(rèn)識(shí)因素和意志因素進(jìn)行了一定的分析，如認(rèn)識(shí)因素包括對(duì)犯罪行為的認(rèn)識(shí)，對(duì)犯罪對(duì)象的認(rèn)識(shí)等。關(guān)于盜竊罪的主觀故意問題，筆者認(rèn)為，應(yīng)為直接故意。在后半部分，筆者根據(jù)《刑法修正案（八）》的精神，對(duì)幾種特殊的盜竊行為：入戶盜竊、攜帶兇器盜竊、扒竊在其內(nèi)涵和認(rèn)定方面作了盡可能深入的理解和分析，如對(duì)“入戶”的理解，對(duì)“兇器”的界定等。秘密竊取是盜竊罪與其他財(cái)產(chǎn)侵占型犯罪相區(qū)別的一個(gè)主要的行為方式，本部分在論述盜竊罪的行為方式時(shí)，仍然堅(jiān)持秘密竊取這一特點(diǎn)。 同時(shí)，筆者在論述幾種特殊物品（如違禁品等）能否成為盜竊罪的對(duì)象問題時(shí)，認(rèn)為，因?yàn)橐恍┻`禁品本身的法律性質(zhì)不同，所以對(duì)一些特殊物品要采用具體問題具體分析的方法去看待。學(xué)界對(duì)盜竊罪的對(duì)象所應(yīng)具有的的特征，說法不一，有的認(rèn)為，它應(yīng)具有“有體性”，有的認(rèn)為，它應(yīng)具有“管理可能性”、“價(jià)值性”等。本文結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐中經(jīng)常出現(xiàn)的復(fù)雜情況，對(duì)盜竊罪認(rèn)定的主要問題進(jìn)行了探討，全文約為 25000 字。作為侵占型財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪之一的盜竊罪歷來都受到各個(gè)時(shí)代、各個(gè)國(guó)家的重視，中外的刑法學(xué)家們也在積極的跟隨社會(huì)發(fā)展的步伐，圍繞著盜竊案件具體形態(tài)的變化進(jìn)行研究和論證。同意學(xué)校向國(guó)家有關(guān)部門或機(jī)構(gòu)送交論文的復(fù)印件和電子文檔。學(xué)位論文作者簽名：簽字