香港特別行政區(qū)6514672415-文庫吧資料
2025-07-01 02:58本頁面
【正文】 articularly when the facts cry out for an explanation.』」 根據(jù)上訴人的會面記錄，她清楚表示事發(fā)時有關(guān)菜館有營業(yè)，亦知道舖前的公共行人道上正在經(jīng)營食物業(yè)一事，並承認當時在舖外的枱櫈是由她經(jīng)營店鋪生意的一部份，又知道現(xiàn)場當時有一?名中國藉女子余?玉?芳正在經(jīng)營食物業(yè)，而余?玉?芳則是擬議承讓人的合伙人。(An accused person should not be surprised if an inference which can legitimately be drawn is more readily drawn when the accused elects not to give evidence.)在R. v. Chong Kin Cheong, CACC196/1995一案中裁定了：『A judge or jury faced with evidence from the prosecution which is unanswered by testimony from the accused is not required to imagine possible defences of which there is no evidence, but, rather, is required to act upon the evidence available.』在R. v. Tan Siew Gim [1995]JA指出：『Where an inference of guilt may properly be drawn from a set of facts, a jury or a judge sitting without a jury, is entitled in the absence of a cr
法律信息相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1